I've stolen books. Both E- and paper. I have no regrets. Just puttin' that out there.
I've stolen books. Both E- and paper. I have no regrets. Just puttin' that out there.
I've always appreciated your honesty about things. Say what they may, you're a class act.I've stolen books. Both E- and paper. I have no regrets. Just puttin' that out there.
that image is
No see, i was also including this:Yeah, you'll notice I refused to purchase the new copies because of the copious amounts of changes. Therefore it's not the original work, therefore not a valid counter-argument. Thanks for trying though.
Well if there's nothing new and no quality increase then what is the point of buying it again?I wasn't making a comparison to quality, I was making a comparison to repurchasing something you already own in a different medium.
steal the e-book-print-instant paperback- profit!that image is
And it was really hard to internet pirate that paperback, but through strength and determination...
That's what I just said. There is no point and I actively find ways of getting the digital version of books I already own on paper.Well if there's nothing new and no quality increase then what is the point of buying it again?
Sorry, it really didn't sound like it:That's what I just said. There is no point and I actively find ways of getting the digital version of books I already own on paper.
Honest mistake.So you'd keep VHS tapes over DVD/BluRay copies?
As opposed to the people posting books that had DRM?!It kind of sucks that someone is taking advantage of Smashwords to pirate books--the book is a Smashwords edition, and Smashwords books come with no copy protection.
More like as opposed to people who cracked DRM, or sourced the material from DRM-protected files. To be sourced from a company that makes part of its image to be "trusting" the users and going DRM-free is a kick in the teeth, and a detriment to the natural progress of media because it reinforces Big Media's assertion that DRM is necessary. It's like that torrent that has gog.com's entire inventory, custom gog.com installers and all. Really, man? 5 bucks is too much for an old game you already know you love, so you gotta pirate EVERY game from this DRM-free site? Way to prove Sony/et al right.As opposed to the people posting books that had DRM?!
I mentioned in a rant thread that someone's pirating mine--which DOES have DRM protection. Bleh. It seems not to matter; people just want stuff.Necro time!
It's interesting to come back and revisit this topic, 5 months later.
My step-father called me up the other day and said "You must have 'made it'...they're pirating your book on the newsgroups." I cracked a smile and instantly thought of this old thread. For you youngsters to the Internet, newsgroups are an old message-board like system that have fallen out of mainstream use--but they still exist, and people evidently still use them to pirate stuff. I'd forgotten all about them until my step-dad mentioned them.
It kind of sucks that someone is taking advantage of Smashwords to pirate books--the book is a Smashwords edition, and Smashwords books come with no copy protection. But I don't really mind my book being out there. The kind of folks that trawl the binaries newsgroups looking for 'warez' (as pirated stuff was known back in the day) aren't the kind of folks I could expect to buy my book anyway. But hopefully, some of them will like it and tell their friends about it.
I'm guessing most didn't see; I was just mentioning so I didn't sound like a broken record.I don't read the rants thread that much these days. I don't think there's any getting away from getting pirated.
That's the reality of the situation - nontangible goods (IE, media that can be digitized) are impossible to really own and sell in the same manner as tangible goods - like, say, sporting equipment or automobiles. The times, they change... and business has to change with it.The sad thing is, if the pirates want it, they'll figure a way to get it.
So Sony is right in using DRM that doesn't actually work because people pirate everything?More like as opposed to people who cracked DRM, or sourced the material from DRM-protected files. To be sourced from a company that makes part of its image to be "trusting" the users and going DRM-free is a kick in the teeth, and a detriment to the natural progress of media because it reinforces Big Media's assertion that DRM is necessary. It's like that torrent that has gog.com's entire inventory, custom gog.com installers and all. Really, man? 5 bucks is too much for an old game you already know you love, so you gotta pirate EVERY game from this DRM-free site? Way to prove Sony/et al right.
By moral high ground you mean something like "sticking it to the man" i take it...Yeah, doing that kind of thing pretty much destroys any claims to the moral high ground that pirates have, and just makes it a basic case of "I don't want to pay you for your stuff."
The funny thing is, Sony doesn't actually have to be right. They just have to be able to seem right in the average person's eyes -- and a company that big can afford a lot of PR representatives who will latch onto things like the rampant piracy of DRM-free stuff to justify the inclusion of DRM in their games, even if it doesn't actually stop anything.So Sony is right in using DRM that doesn't actually work because people pirate everything?
Well, that's the justification I see all the time, at least.By moral high ground you mean something like "sticking it to the man" i take it...
No, but the piracy of DRM-free material seems at first glance to support such an assertion, which is dangerous because someone like, say, a FEDERAL JUDGE, might not go deeper than first glance.So Sony is right in using DRM that doesn't actually work because people pirate everything?
But going by that the use of DRM or not wouldn't really matter, as The Man would be bad anyway for the reasons that make it The Man...Well, that's the justification I see all the time, at least.
I for one would expect a Judge to be able to tell that whether or not a work had DRM in no way influences the infringement of copyright... if he/she can't then, well, the broken justice system is more of a concern imo.No, but the piracy of DRM-free material seems at first glance to support such an assertion, which is dangerous because someone like, say, a FEDERAL JUDGE, might not go deeper than first glance.