I liked that because I love the smell of books not because I hate clutter. I love clutter.I'm torn, because the efficient me wants to convert entirely. I hate clutter, I try not to own much 'stuff' (though I still have too much 'stuff'), and I suppose it would save me some money (maybe even a lot of money). But the sentimental me just loves holding a book. There's something about the texture, even the 'smell' of a book that can't be replaced.
I didn't think about this. Closing a book is like an achievement, there's this lovely that release that comes with finishing it. Plus you can bear witness to your triumph: look at those hundreds, thousands! of pages you've conquered.As weird as this sounds, I always feel more fulfilled after reading from an actual book than off a nook.
To be honest, there is only one thing that bothers me about going all digital: What will we leave behind for people to discover if everything is digital?
I like digital for scientific articles. They were a pain to store and index before pdfs became so commonplace. But I prefer my books as books. Books in my office tend to serve as references, and I can access them more easily in paper form.I want to make my classroom paperless and my bookshelf paperless. It won't be overnight but it is my long term hope. I seem to move every few years and am expecting to move again in 2 or 3 years. Books are damn heavy, they can take up a lot of space, and after I have read them once, they are basically decoration (99.99% of them, anyway). To me, books are information, and that can be stored digitally. I just checked out from my library my first digital book. Next I will be trying an audio book. The selection for digital checkouts is not fantastic and it rather difficult to just browse like I can with physical books, but I can definitely see the potential. To be honest, there is only one thing that bothers me about going all digital: What will we leave behind for people to discover if everything is digital?
It'll get here, probably in about 10 years. The faded color ones are just a start. More important than the color is the speed. The refresh rate on e-ink is awful. They are working on that too, though.eBooks? Call me back when electronic paper has a color version that looks as good as as a modern comic book, and costs as much as B&W readers do now.
Yeah, reading comics on a tablet just causes my eyes to hurt. And you can't beat that new comic smell.Oh no doubt that I still prefer graphic novels on paper, but straight black and white print? I'd take digital on a big tablet any day.
Actually, we did this with our recent move. With Netflix and Hulu (among other things) we find there are lots of new things to watch. It is more directed, I'll give you that. We do browse, though, and try out new things. But we tend to latch on to a new TV show and watch it obsessively rather than tune in every week. The current obsession: Mad Men.I like digital for scientific articles. They were a pain to store and index before pdfs became so commonplace. But I prefer my books as books. Books in my office tend to serve as references, and I can access them more easily in paper form.
As far as discovery goes, I ask this question every time someone tells me they've dropped cable. The primary thing keeping me from dropping cable and going full broadband is the randomness and potential for discovery in traditional programming. Deciding on shows and then directly accessing them feels isolated or closed to me. I agree with you. I would feel the same for books.
having cut cable years ago I just discovered breaking bad on Netflix. oh my gods yes.Actually, we did this with our recent move. With Netflix and Hulu (among other things) we find there are lots of new things to watch. It is more directed, I'll give you that. We do browse, though, and try out new things. But we tend to latch on to a new TV show and watch it obsessively rather than tune in every week. The current obsession: Mad Men.
This. This right fucking here.I've found that bottom-line, a book's importance to me is what's written within it. I find that I'm less concerned with how that information makes its way into my brain.
I have a production element here at work titled "non-stop toddler." Listening to it is the cutest, most effective form of birth control I can think of."No! Don't eat Mommy's Kobo!" Is a pretty common phrase in my house. Eibooks don't stand up well to toddlers. My little girl barfed all over my hardcover book and it cleaned right up, Gramma's Kindle didn't fare as well.
The kindle can do sharing to another persons kindle accountAnother thing. Sharing. I love sharing books with people and talking about them later. I can't share an ereader (because there goes everything I'm currently reading, too), but I can totally give you my copy of The Man Who Was Thursday while I keep reading my things. With an ereader I have to encourage you to buy the book on your own, which you may not be able/willing to do. I think people are much more likely to read something someone physically hands them, partly just because it is there, and partly because the physical object represents something your friend wants to share with you and carries some emotional weight.
Unless you're a heartless monster.
Some laws need to be broken, and that's one of them. (another is 55 mph highway speed limits)well just remember that even if you bought it in one form that does not cover all other forms. It is still a violation of copyright.
Well, a 20 dollar book is a lot more replaceable then a 600 dollar iPad or 200 dollar Kindle. Just saying.I like the feel of a real book, but e-readers are much nicer. The argument for the tub is moot. If you drop a book into the tub, it gets ruined just as well.
I hate how if you get one Ereader, you're kind of stuck with it, or else have to buy them all again on the new one.I really just don't want to make a huge investment on a Kindle or anything right now. I prefer hardbacks, but the price point is basically all that's keeping me from getting one.
Like the millions of people they were going to crack down on for mp3/movie pirating right?Because if they actually do decide to enforce it the "but lots of people do it, uh i didnt know it was illegal uh it isn't a big deal" defense isn't going to help you.
Now I was going to say something but I'm not because I don't feel like being a bitch..... right now.Damn it I forgot that on this forum we only talk about serious issues and things of dire importance.
My bad.
That's not strictly true. There is a gray area where you are allowed to transform the work into a format you can consume. For instance, the blind use machines that turn books into spoken audio, and even if the audio book exists, they are still allowed to do this transformation. Because of this, there is a gray area where you might be allowed to purchase a work, then obtain, through a third party, a pre-transformed version of the same work, especially in cases where you cannot transform it yourself without great expense, or cases where you cannot consume the original form.no matter how many times you have paid for it and in what forms, you are still not entitled to it in other forms
An argument for the ages, to be sure.but is having a machine read a book really another form of the book or just another way of accessing the original book?
Yeah well when you've had an investigation of enforcement agencies tap you, you tend to be a bit more careful with your words.I dislike it when people say "acquire" when the fact is unless it was given as a gift by the creator, it was stolen. I don't particularly care if people do it, I just wish they wouldn't be dishonest about it. It's the same sort of white-wash speech politicians used to candy up a shitty policy that screws others over.
I'm kind of surprised by that. My technical books are still the only things I have to have in paper. I've just found it easier to search through an actual book rather than deal with PDFs and the like.An argument for the ages, to be sure.
In many cases, one is allowed to make and keep "backup" copies of copyrighted materials. People don't think about it for books, because they aren't easy to copy, but legally one could put each page of their book on a copy machine and store the result (or original) in a secure location while using the original (or copy) for the intended use.
The arguments, however, usually revolve around distribution. It's not making a personal copy that is the problem - it's giving that copy away.
In other words, if I buy a book, then obtain a digital copy from another source, I haven't done anything illegal. The source I got the digital copy from, however, may have violated copyright.
...but I'm getting off track here.
I've recently rid myself of a few shelf fulls of books - mostly technical - and pay a monthly fee to safari books online for unlimited access to their digital copies of their technical books. I still print a few things out, but between a multi-monitor setup, and the iPad, I am coming towards going completely digital.
Even with three 24" monitors and two 17" monitors and the iPad at my workstation, though, I still don't have enough space to work as fast as I prefer, so I still print some things out - usually only a dozen or so pages at a time though. I prefer that to having the whole 400 page book or manual in front of me though - too much desk space, not easy to move around, and can't look at 5 different sections of the book at once. Gimme a pdf and I can see as much or as little of it as I want at any given time.
I've recently read a few books on the iPad (Old Man's War pdf is free online, and it's a good scifi book) and I really enjoy it. The iPad is heavier than a cheap paperback, but that's the only downside. The upsides are being able to use the iPad for a variety of things when I'm not reading and not having to lug the book around with me (which means I can read it in small bites anywhere, such as the line in the grocery store). I always have the iPad with me.
So while I really enjoy the feel of a paper book in hand, I think I'd rather have it all digitally now.
Addendum: you don't play nintendo games?So you'd keep VHS tapes over DVD/BluRay copies?
Macs have been able to do since like 1989.One thing I love about my Kindle that I forgot to mention. The built in dictionary. Being able to look up a word without even having to leave the page is just awesome.
I don't play them on a NES, that's for sure.Addendum: you don't play nintendo games?
*goes back to playing starfox 64 3D
I wasn't making a comparison to quality, I was making a comparison to repurchasing something you already own in a different medium.That doesn't seem like an accurate comparison. VHS to dvd is often a big boost in sound and audio quality. A physical book is on par with the electronic to most people. Not to me though Kindle is nowhere near as nice as a physical book as far as page quality goes and pdfs are punishment from the gods.
This is a very fun CYOA series, available free and very fun. I recommend it: Project Aon - Lone WolfThat's pretty interesting actually. Imagine a Choose Your Own Adventure book, with clickable links at the bottom of every page, so that it took you directly to the page you chose? That'd be fantastic.
Doesn't really matter, as according to most copyright you're not buying the physical writing inside the book, but the right to read the work...but is having a machine read a book really another form of the book or just another way of accessing the original book?
Ahem: https://www.halforums.com/threads/noooooooo-george-lucas-is-at-it-again.26159/page-4So you'd keep VHS tapes over DVD/BluRay copies?
Suddenly you're making moral justifications for your behavior now? And, totally in the tinfoil hat section I'm guessing that if your ass is tapped by los federales on the net they probably have a good idea of what's on your HD.Yeah well when you've had an investigation of enforcement agencies tap you, you tend to be a bit more careful with your words.
I've always appreciated your honesty about things. Say what they may, you're a class act.I've stolen books. Both E- and paper. I have no regrets. Just puttin' that out there.
that image is
No see, i was also including this:Yeah, you'll notice I refused to purchase the new copies because of the copious amounts of changes. Therefore it's not the original work, therefore not a valid counter-argument. Thanks for trying though.
Well if there's nothing new and no quality increase then what is the point of buying it again?I wasn't making a comparison to quality, I was making a comparison to repurchasing something you already own in a different medium.
steal the e-book-print-instant paperback- profit!that image is
And it was really hard to internet pirate that paperback, but through strength and determination...
That's what I just said. There is no point and I actively find ways of getting the digital version of books I already own on paper.Well if there's nothing new and no quality increase then what is the point of buying it again?
Sorry, it really didn't sound like it:That's what I just said. There is no point and I actively find ways of getting the digital version of books I already own on paper.
Honest mistake.So you'd keep VHS tapes over DVD/BluRay copies?
As opposed to the people posting books that had DRM?!It kind of sucks that someone is taking advantage of Smashwords to pirate books--the book is a Smashwords edition, and Smashwords books come with no copy protection.
More like as opposed to people who cracked DRM, or sourced the material from DRM-protected files. To be sourced from a company that makes part of its image to be "trusting" the users and going DRM-free is a kick in the teeth, and a detriment to the natural progress of media because it reinforces Big Media's assertion that DRM is necessary. It's like that torrent that has gog.com's entire inventory, custom gog.com installers and all. Really, man? 5 bucks is too much for an old game you already know you love, so you gotta pirate EVERY game from this DRM-free site? Way to prove Sony/et al right.As opposed to the people posting books that had DRM?!
I mentioned in a rant thread that someone's pirating mine--which DOES have DRM protection. Bleh. It seems not to matter; people just want stuff.Necro time!
It's interesting to come back and revisit this topic, 5 months later.
My step-father called me up the other day and said "You must have 'made it'...they're pirating your book on the newsgroups." I cracked a smile and instantly thought of this old thread. For you youngsters to the Internet, newsgroups are an old message-board like system that have fallen out of mainstream use--but they still exist, and people evidently still use them to pirate stuff. I'd forgotten all about them until my step-dad mentioned them.
It kind of sucks that someone is taking advantage of Smashwords to pirate books--the book is a Smashwords edition, and Smashwords books come with no copy protection. But I don't really mind my book being out there. The kind of folks that trawl the binaries newsgroups looking for 'warez' (as pirated stuff was known back in the day) aren't the kind of folks I could expect to buy my book anyway. But hopefully, some of them will like it and tell their friends about it.
I'm guessing most didn't see; I was just mentioning so I didn't sound like a broken record.I don't read the rants thread that much these days. I don't think there's any getting away from getting pirated.
That's the reality of the situation - nontangible goods (IE, media that can be digitized) are impossible to really own and sell in the same manner as tangible goods - like, say, sporting equipment or automobiles. The times, they change... and business has to change with it.The sad thing is, if the pirates want it, they'll figure a way to get it.
So Sony is right in using DRM that doesn't actually work because people pirate everything?More like as opposed to people who cracked DRM, or sourced the material from DRM-protected files. To be sourced from a company that makes part of its image to be "trusting" the users and going DRM-free is a kick in the teeth, and a detriment to the natural progress of media because it reinforces Big Media's assertion that DRM is necessary. It's like that torrent that has gog.com's entire inventory, custom gog.com installers and all. Really, man? 5 bucks is too much for an old game you already know you love, so you gotta pirate EVERY game from this DRM-free site? Way to prove Sony/et al right.
By moral high ground you mean something like "sticking it to the man" i take it...Yeah, doing that kind of thing pretty much destroys any claims to the moral high ground that pirates have, and just makes it a basic case of "I don't want to pay you for your stuff."
The funny thing is, Sony doesn't actually have to be right. They just have to be able to seem right in the average person's eyes -- and a company that big can afford a lot of PR representatives who will latch onto things like the rampant piracy of DRM-free stuff to justify the inclusion of DRM in their games, even if it doesn't actually stop anything.So Sony is right in using DRM that doesn't actually work because people pirate everything?
Well, that's the justification I see all the time, at least.By moral high ground you mean something like "sticking it to the man" i take it...
No, but the piracy of DRM-free material seems at first glance to support such an assertion, which is dangerous because someone like, say, a FEDERAL JUDGE, might not go deeper than first glance.So Sony is right in using DRM that doesn't actually work because people pirate everything?
But going by that the use of DRM or not wouldn't really matter, as The Man would be bad anyway for the reasons that make it The Man...Well, that's the justification I see all the time, at least.
I for one would expect a Judge to be able to tell that whether or not a work had DRM in no way influences the infringement of copyright... if he/she can't then, well, the broken justice system is more of a concern imo.No, but the piracy of DRM-free material seems at first glance to support such an assertion, which is dangerous because someone like, say, a FEDERAL JUDGE, might not go deeper than first glance.