Was there an angry, middle-aged man yelling at that chair?
I think you just described the archetypal Columbia professor.Was there an angry, middle-aged man yelling at that chair?
...is 82 middle aged now? Because living to 160 would be awesome.Was there an angry, middle-aged man yelling at that chair?
No but 50-60 would be middle aged... like 20-30 years ago....is 82 middle aged now? Because living to 160 would be awesome.
When the Party leaders and stars in the Republican party vowed and planned to do everything they could to make sure Obama was a one term president from the moment he won the presidency, what do you expect him to do??4 Years, Gilgamesh. He couldn't turn around in 4 years what it took 8 to create.
Inherited inschmerited. Democrats took just as active, if not more active, a role in creating the crash of 08. On multiple separate occasions GWB himself gave warning that Fannie and Freddie needed to be overhauled and re-examined, and each time democrats like Chris Dodd and especially Barney Frank shouted down any call for reform by saying that anyone who even thought about such things clearly just wanted minorities to freeze to death homeless in the cold. And then the answer (which, yes, republicans signed on with as well, the morons) was a Keynesian boondoggle that poured close to a trillion dollars down the rabbit hole of fictional congressional districts, fake or untenable alternative energy scams, and even political advertising on MSNBC while talking about mythical shovel-ready jobs. Furthermore, the democrats have not passed a budget, not even a budget! in the last 3 years. And let's not forget, that he "fixed" our medical insurance problems by making it illegal to be uninsured.None of that compares to the choice of the other side and most of it is due to the previous 8yrs. So yeah, that's just Republican rhetoric and ignoring of the facts that it was the result of what he inherited and there was no way to turn around that much damage in 8yrs.
What an easy animal you are to herd.No I was talking about the 8yrs prior to Obama.
Oh and I can say for one of the very few times in my life, I was cheering, clapping and yelling at my TV screen tonight during Clinton's speech. Not because I think he's the greatest political speaker of my time, but because of how he completely destroyed every attack the Republicans have lobbed at Obama and his record.
My adrenaline is pumpin.
Last count I heard, it was more like 13 weeks because Ted Kennedy was ill or something. Or that's the current spin at least.And 2 years of a filibuster-proof senate is more than the republicans ever had.
I just hope the hollow ring of those words comfort you as the middle class evaporates and your family struggles to make ends meet when the bill comes due for the nation and no amount of rock star charm will stave off the inevitable collapse that will make 2008 look like a pothole. But hey, as long as you've got your bread and circuses to keep you happy, to hell with the future, right? Fiscal responsibility's for squares.Yeah, you continue on that mind set, I'll continue voting for the guy who helps my family, my friends and the people who need it. It might not be any different to you, it's been different for me and continues to be.
Per GasbanditLast count I heard, it was more like 13 weeks because Ted Kennedy was ill or something. Or that's the current spin at least.[
You make it really hard to tell whether you're pulling some Poe's Law level stuff but, it's not spin
It takes 60 votes to overcome a filibuster in the US Senate, which is now the default to get pretty much anything done. As Scarborough well knows, the Democrats didn’t reach that 60-seat threshold in the Senate until Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) was sworn in on July 7, 2009. They lost that majority upon the swearing-in of Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) on Feb. 4, 2010, just under seven months later. While state politician Christie can possibly be forgiven such an error, someone with Joe Scarborough’s reach and influence ought to have better than a 71% margin of error.
As Mother Jones‘ Kevin Drum points out, though, the actual amount of time the Democrats held a filibuster-proof majority, when you factor in the late Sen. Ted Kennedy‘s illness and the winter recess, amounts to 14 weeks.
and before Gas puts in Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, I counter with Lieberman and a bunch of blue dog democrats.
I just hope the hollow ring of those words comfort you as the middle class evaporates and your family struggles to make ends meet when the bill comes due for the nation and no amount of rock star charm will stave off the inevitable collapse that will make 2008 look like a pothole. But hey, as long as you've got your bread and circuses to keep you happy, to hell with the future, right? Fiscal responsibility's for squares.
Of course that will work, how else do you think... oh, oh wait. You thought he meant the NATIONAL debt? Oh, no, that's fucked.Silent Bob said:Did you know that Romney's plan to solve the debt crisis is to cut 5 trillion in taxes? How exactly does that math work?
Not to be rude but there is absolutely no way you can know this... at all. I mean, I admire your positive thinking but really things could be rosy, things could stay the same or things could degrade horribly.and the 4yrs that will come will only be positive under his administration.
I thought "screw you I got mine" was supposed to be a republican slogan?My family's finances are in a better place since he took office so you can spout rhetoric all you want, my life is actually affected by the last 4yrs in a positive way and the 4yrs that will come will only be positive under his administration.
I forget not everybody here knows my 10+ year track record in these threads. You're not the first to call me chicken little, and you won't be the last. Now, I come down hard a lot on the democrats because there's not a lot of conservatism going on around here and I feel I have to personally make up the balance for about 5 people. But rest assured that while I do not think 4 more years of Barack Obama will be good for the country, I do not exactly salivate over the thought of a Romney administration either. The guy is a windsock. Ted Kennedy was right about one thing, when he was debating Romney over abortion, Kennedy said "I'm pro choice, he's multiple choice." Frankly I had hoped we'd seen the last of him after he lost in 2008, but the only worthwhile person in the R primary this time around (Cain) was clubbed to character-death by an overzealous media. Me? I'm a card carrying registered Libertarian. I'll be voting for Gary Johnson. Cutting taxes is nice and all, but the real issue here is how we need to cut spending and shrink government. Drastically. Democrats want to be in your wallet, Republicans want to be in your bedroom, I want government in neither.(chicken little img)
You talk about fiscal responsibility as if it's the Democratic party that's guilty of promoting massive unwarranted tax cuts. Are you forgetting that Bill Clinton essentially had the debt issue resolved until W took office? Did you know that Romney's plan to solve the debt crisis is to cut 5 trillion in taxes? How exactly does that math work?
And you forget my previous response. But it's not like it matters - the real reason for the paralysis during that term - as also previously explained - was democrats going off the reservation to try to save their own seats in the midterms. The republicans didn't even have to try to filibuster because the democrats deadlocked themselves.Per Gasbandit
And 2 years of a filibuster-proof senate is more than the republicans ever had.
You brought this bullcrap out again?
You're purposely not trying to -get it- so I'll let you just keep going.I thought "screw you I got mine" was supposed to be a republican slogan?
So you've been saying the sky's falling for 10yrs and it's still there and you don't see a problem?GasBandit said:I forget not everybody here knows my 10+ year track record in these threads. You're not the first to call me chicken little, and you won't be the last.
That was 9.5 trillion dollars in national debt ago, and at the time I thought a 6 trillion debt was bad. But hey, I'm sure the ever accelerating deficits will just be disregarded for the rest of our lives at least, right?You're purposely not trying to -get it- so I'll let you just keep going.
So you've been saying the sky's falling for 10yrs and it's still there and you don't see a problem?
Yep. (I can be dismissive too)That was 9.5 trillion dollars in national debt ago, and at the time I thought a 6 trillion debt was bad. But hey, I'm sure the ever accelerating deficits will just be disregarded for the rest of our lives at least, right?
Yep.Yep. (I can be dismissive too)
IIRC, wasn't that the argument against Bush, in the first 7.5 years of prosperity, that it was all leftover from the "good" Clinton did? It's kind of the same argument both ways, no matter who's "in" at the time, as long as it flips back and forth. Hell, I've seen this argument in Canada for and against both Chretien and Harper at the least. It's a really old tactic that means jack IMO.None of that compares to the choice of the other side and most of it is due to the previous 8yrs. So yeah, that's just Republican rhetoric and ignoring of the facts that it was the result of what he inherited and there was no way to turn around that much damage in 8yrs.