I actually started laughing out loud while I was scrolling down.
She's done a liiiiiittle bit more than "poor email server management." It's clear that author has an axe to grind and isn't afraid to use his station as senior editor of a national publication to further it.
It's no worse than what government officials have been doing for years. I'm not saying one is better than the other, I'm saying I just don't care. Honestly, I find the whole thing silly.She's done a liiiiiittle bit more than "poor email server management." It's clear that author has an axe to grind and isn't afraid to use his station as senior editor of a national publication to further it.
Watergate was a dumb botched breakin, and the coverup ended a presidency that carried 49 states. It is so laughably tiny in comparison, and a sad commentary on how little integrity the presidency is expected to have these days.It's no worse than what government officials have been doing for years. I'm not saying one is better than the other, I'm saying I just don't care. Honestly, I find the whole thing silly.
No, I mean I find it silly that there are even requirements that deal with emails. I just don't care. But yeah, compare it to breaking into a hotel and stealing information. Lets not be silly, ok?Watergate was a dumb botched breakin, and the coverup ended a presidency that carried 49 states. It is so laughably tiny in comparison, and a sad commentary on how little integrity the presidency is expected to have these days.
There are requirements that deal with all kinds of classified and secret information, no matter what the medium of transference. But to me, the e-mail thing is different because it wasn't malicious, it was just incompetent. Normally Hillary is the other way around - malicious but competent.No, I mean I find it silly that there are even requirements that deal with emails. I just don't care. But yeah, compare it to breaking into a hotel and stealing information. Lets not be silly, ok?
I just posted this.So apparently there may be some really messed up stuff in the works involving Trump and Russia. I haven't wrapped my head around it yet but apparently there was Trump server communicating with a Russian bank server. The Russian bank has some weird ties to Paul Manafort.
The article and some analysis can be found here
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5af8ku/was_a_trump_server_communicating_with_russia/
I would love to hear the Republican response to this.
Crooked "experts" rigging the election, part of the conspiracy to keep Trump down, all lies, lies, lies. Don't you just feel these people are trying to influence you? Don't listen to these "experts", you know how you feel and what's good.the idea of him, or more likely one of his handlers, having a deep connection to Russia is legitimately frightening. I would love to hear the Republican response to this.
But with the amount of support he actually pulled in, it's just depressing.I'm still not entirely convinced that Trump wasn't a long-con false flag to deliver Hillary the election this time. I mean, he was a full fledged democrat supporter until Obama aced out Hillary in 08, then suddenly he became a birther and next thing you know, here we are.
Honestly, if it came out that Trump is sleeping with Ivanka, I would be depressed but not surprised. :/Trump is so consistently guilty of literally every single line item that he accuses the Clintons of doing that I'm starting to worry that Melania is a serial sexual predator.
Sleeping? Nah. Grabbing by the pussy? Of course, that's normal.Honestly, if it came out that Trump is sleeping with Ivanka, I would be depressed but not surprised. :/
I would be jealous.Honestly, if it came out that Trump is sleeping with Ivanka, I would be depressed but not surprised. :/
I'll believe it the second he accuses Bill of molesting Chelsea.Honestly, if it came out that Trump is sleeping with Ivanka, I would be depressed but not surprised. :/
I suppose the kind of man who 1) treats all women that way, 2) treats their adult children as independent adults, and 3) doesn't have such a strong a taboo against incest that they won't even voice opinions about their relative's sexual attractiveness.What sort of a man calls his own daughter a "piece of ass?"
Not having anything valuable to add hasn't stopped like 95% of the posts in this thread so let's not let that get in our way now.
He didn't say valuable, he said interesting. I almost took feigned offence - would've posted "*sniff* I resemble that remark " but then I actually read his post.Not having anything valuable to add hasn't stopped like 95% of the posts in this thread so let's not let that get in our way now.
Well I thought I neatly dissected the disgust. The only thing I hadn't mentioned, mostly because it seems too obvious to mention, is the biological basis for cultural taboos against incest.proceed, steinman
I realize, of course, that you're looking at this and probably thinking I'm a terrible person to even ponder the disgust behind the statement....is there something more deeply wrong with it that I'm missing?
You sure that wasn't a rhetorical question? I mean, it was at the start of a paragraph. And yadda yadda yadda I just need to add some words in here to pad out this paragraph so that it's large enough to look like a paragraph. But I'm getting lazy, so I'm going to resort to plagiarizing. A moose once bit my sister. No really! She was carving her initials on the moose with the sharpened end of an interspace toothbrush given her by Svenge - her brother-in-law - an Oslo dentist and star "The Høt Hands of an Oslo Dentist' and 'Fillings of Passion.'I laid it out to spur discussion, and asked a specific question, which, as of yet, remains unanswered: