You know, they want his "real" one, if you know what I mean (I don't).I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
It is not. The bill does not target an individual.I'm pretty sure this is illegal.
Frankly I'm rather shocked that this is not already in place in all 50 states. You would think MAKING SURE YOU'RE ELIGIBLE would be required before putting ones name on the ballot.It would require U.S. presidential candidates who want to appear on the ballot in Arizona to submit documents proving they meet the constitutional requirements to be president.
Sorry Baer. You'll just have to mention it to the authorities when they stop you and ask for your citizenship papers.Sometimes my state really sucks. It seems like lately its been sucking extra hard.
http://images.google.com/images?um=...the+fucking+birth+certificate&spell=1&start=0I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
Sorry Baer. You'll just have to mention it to the authorities when they stop you and ask for your citizenship papers.[/QUOTE]Sometimes my state really sucks. It seems like lately its been sucking extra hard.
http://images.google.com/images?um=...the+fucking+birth+certificate&spell=1&start=0[/QUOTE]I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
http://images.google.com/images?um=...the+fucking+birth+certificate&spell=1&start=0[/QUOTE]I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
http://images.google.com/images?um=...the+fucking+birth+certificate&spell=1&start=0[/QUOTE]I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
http://images.google.com/images?um=...the+fucking+birth+certificate&spell=1&start=0[/QUOTE]I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
http://images.google.com/images?um=...the+fucking+birth+certificate&spell=1&start=0[/QUOTE]I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
http://images.google.com/images?um=...the+fucking+birth+certificate&spell=1&start=0[/QUOTE]I don't understand, I thought he had made his BC available? Is it not available to the public or press?
See, now that's a little better.
NEVAR HE'S A SPACE ALIEN ELONGATED MIDGET MARTIAN VENUSIAN FROM JUPITER AND YUO CANT DISPROVE ITNow stop being a birther, you friggin' birther.
*I* don't need anything. I don't think he wasn't born in Hawaii. I think the "birther" movement is a dead end. I was just pointing out that the forcefully conclusive link... wasn't so much.The fuck you looking for? A mailed copy to your home?
I photoshopped my own driver's license when I was 19 to buy booze. It never failed me, be it pub, liquor store, or strip joint. This was before they started swiping the magnetic strip to check though. Might have been more convincing because this was also back when color laser printers (which we had one where I worked) cost upwards of $10k or more.So what you are saying is because anything can be doctored pictures can't be trusted?
Also helps you live in Texas. Though I don't get your point? are you saying that because you faked it nothing can be real?I photoshopped my own driver's license when I was 19 to buy booze. It never failed me, be it pub, liquor store, or strip joint. This was before they started swiping the magnetic strip to check though. Might have been more convincing because this was also back when color laser printers (which we had one where I worked) cost upwards of $10k or more.So what you are saying is because anything can be doctored pictures can't be trusted?
Also helps you live in Texas. Though I don't get your point? are you saying that because you faked it nothing can be real?[/QUOTE]I photoshopped my own driver's license when I was 19 to buy booze. It never failed me, be it pub, liquor store, or strip joint. This was before they started swiping the magnetic strip to check though. Might have been more convincing because this was also back when color laser printers (which we had one where I worked) cost upwards of $10k or more.So what you are saying is because anything can be doctored pictures can't be trusted?
No, my point is that a digital image on the internet, provided without reference or corroborating testimonial, is unacceptable as proof in an argument. I don't know why everybody thinks I'm this blind, frothing birther when I've said three times I'm not. I think you guys are trying harder for an argument than I ever do.I think what he's saying is that there's the potential justification to consider anything fake, which is what conspiracy theorists always pounce on, no matter how much information there is to the contrary.
But it IS evidence, just insufficient on its own. You can't discount it entirely simply because it is incomplete evidence.No, my point is that a digital image on the internet, provided without reference or corroborating testimonial, is unacceptable as proof in an argument.
But it IS evidence, just insufficient on its own. You can't discount it entirely simply because it is incomplete evidence.[/QUOTE]No, my point is that a digital image on the internet, provided without reference or corroborating testimonial, is unacceptable as proof in an argument.
But it IS evidence, just insufficient on its own. You can't discount it entirely simply because it is incomplete evidence.[/QUOTE]No, my point is that a digital image on the internet, provided without reference or corroborating testimonial, is unacceptable as proof in an argument.
I'm not accusing you of being a birther. You are being intentionally obtuse. You can assert, beyond a reasonable doubt, that his birth certificate has been supplied and it is indeed the one posted describing Obama as being born in Hawaii. [/quote] I can assert that, but NOT BASED ON THIS POST. Based on a lot of other things.Somebody with no grasp of what's going on accusing me of asserting Obama was born in Kenya in 5.. 4... 3...
Actually, I link opinion pieces (in other threads) and claim them to be argument. Which has nothing to do with this thread, fallaciously enough. Every link I have provided in this thread was explicitly linked to an example of bad internet "evidence." But when you start making arguments that "your position in this thread is wrong because I disagree with you and/or your methods in another thread," you've already lost.However, because you want to make waves and play devils advocate in the interest of getting people riled up, you continue making up your own definitions for words and treat everything that doesn't support the narrative you wish to put out there as inconclusive and doubtful. At the same time you'll like to opinion pieces and claim them to be fact, even when they don't have sources or links to where they received their information.
Then you must be the MSNBC. Sorry about that, man. I know it's rough to suck so bad.So no, you aren't a birther. You're the Fox News of the forum.
I'm not accusing you of being a birther. You are being intentionally obtuse. You can assert, beyond a reasonable doubt, that his birth certificate has been supplied and it is indeed the one posted describing Obama as being born in Hawaii. [/QUOTE] I can assert that, but NOT BASED ON THIS POST. Based on a lot of other things.Somebody with no grasp of what's going on accusing me of asserting Obama was born in Kenya in 5.. 4... 3...
Actually, I link opinion pieces (in other threads) and claim them to be argument. Which has nothing to do with this thread, fallaciously enough. Every link I have provided in this thread was explicitly linked to an example of bad internet "evidence." But when you start making arguments that "your position in this thread is wrong because I disagree with you and/or your methods in another thread," you've already lost.However, because you want to make waves and play devils advocate in the interest of getting people riled up, you continue making up your own definitions for words and treat everything that doesn't support the narrative you wish to put out there as inconclusive and doubtful. At the same time you'll like to opinion pieces and claim them to be fact, even when they don't have sources or links to where they received their information.
Then you must be the MSNBC. Sorry about that, man. I know it's rough to suck so bad. [/QUOTE]So no, you aren't a birther. You're the Fox News of the forum.
COOPER: You -- you also said to our producer that the president identified himself as a foreigner on his college application.
ASH: Yes.
COOPER: You know that's not true, right?
ASH: I didn't know that that was not true.
COOPER: That's a story that was put out on April Fool's Day. It's a fake AP news story.
COOPER: So, where was George Bush born?
ASH: I have no idea where George Bush was born.
COOPER: But you -- that wasn't a concern for you when he was in office?
ASH: The issue never came up.
COOPER: What about Bill Clinton? Where was he born?
ASH: I have no idea.
COOPER: So, all of a sudden, you're concerned about where the president of the United States is born, based on calls you're getting from constituents who are misinformed?
ASH: Actually, I did not get any calls from constituents until after this bill was passed.
If you're more like a late night host, I'm more like a chinese jet pilot.Besides, I'm more a late night talk show host. I find one of your ridiculous stories and then make fun of it. I hardly take a slew of news items , throw them into a forum, and see which ones cause the most damage. That's your job.
If you're more like a late night host, I'm more like a chinese jet pilot.[/QUOTE]Besides, I'm more a late night talk show host. I find one of your ridiculous stories and then make fun of it. I hardly take a slew of news items , throw them into a forum, and see which ones cause the most damage. That's your job.
But it IS evidence, just insufficient on its own. You can't discount it entirely simply because it is incomplete evidence.[/QUOTE]No, my point is that a digital image on the internet, provided without reference or corroborating testimonial, is unacceptable as proof in an argument.
The classics never go out of style, wisenheimer.See? You're borrowing from 1992!
I tell ya what. I'll just stop responding to you for, oh, a month. That will give you some time to get back in this decade with your come-backs.
This I find hilarious, I only make that statement cause I know how much you care about the crappy state of Texas. But the fact you point out some random incident of a over zealous police officer =/= the whole state being super tough on alcohol. Course that goes well in a thread where you are complaining about the use of evidence in proving something.1) You know very little about Texas. As I often say, there's no bureaucrat like a Texas bureaucrat. You're implying Texas is lax with who they sell liquor to. You're wrong. Heck, a couple years ago, there was a bit of fuss because state troopers went into a hotel bar and started arresting people IN the bar because they MIGHT drive home afterwards... even the ones who had reserved rooms at the hotel.
This I find hilarious, I only make that statement cause I know how much you care about the crappy state of Texas. But the fact you point out some random incident of a over zealous police officer =/= the whole state being super tough on alcohol. Course that goes well in a thread where you are complaining about the use of evidence in proving something.[/QUOTE] You're right, it was anecdotal evidence, but it wasn't a single "zealous police officer," it was a large number of them working together. Texas DPS and TABC have a history bordering on notorious for this sort of thing. You want evidence?1) You know very little about Texas. As I often say, there's no bureaucrat like a Texas bureaucrat. You're implying Texas is lax with who they sell liquor to. You're wrong. Heck, a couple years ago, there was a bit of fuss because state troopers went into a hotel bar and started arresting people IN the bar because they MIGHT drive home afterwards... even the ones who had reserved rooms at the hotel.
This I find hilarious, I only make that statement cause I know how much you care about the crappy state of Texas. But the fact you point out some random incident of a over zealous police officer =/= the whole state being super tough on alcohol. Course that goes well in a thread where you are complaining about the use of evidence in proving something.[/QUOTE] You're right, it was anecdotal evidence, but it wasn't a single "zealous police officer," it was a large number of them working together. Texas DPS and TABC have a history bordering on notorious for this sort of thing. You want evidence?1) You know very little about Texas. As I often say, there's no bureaucrat like a Texas bureaucrat. You're implying Texas is lax with who they sell liquor to. You're wrong. Heck, a couple years ago, there was a bit of fuss because state troopers went into a hotel bar and started arresting people IN the bar because they MIGHT drive home afterwards... even the ones who had reserved rooms at the hotel.
God Bless America[/QUOTE]There's no bureaucrat like a Texas bureaucrat.
This'll be an interesting constitutional crisis.And that crazy bill has been signed into law
So, if you look somewhat foreign, or not Caucasian or African descent, don't forget your papers, or you may be locked up.
This'll be an interesting constitutional crisis.[/QUOTE]And that crazy bill has been signed into law
So, if you look somewhat foreign, or not Caucasian or African descent, don't forget your papers, or you may be locked up.
Yeah, trying to tell any Native American where he can and cannot go is a sure cause for insurgency.Grats Arizona... you've displaced Texas as "The State that Most Scares Foreigners." :lol:
State sanctioned racism is the best racism.An AZ Congressman has called for a boycott of his own state over this new law.
The law gives the officer \"discretion\" over who they can request documentation from. That means whenever he damn well feels like it. So really anyone's fair game.
Wait, you still want to visit America?When I visit America, I'll be sure that Arizona is a state I stay far away from.
Vermont is gorgeous in Autumn. (But get out before winter)Wait, you still want to visit America?
Vermont is gorgeous in Autumn. (But get out before winter)[/QUOTE]Wait, you still want to visit America?
That's a pretty stupid reason not to go to Arizona. It's not like you won't have your passport with you anyway...When I visit America, I'll be sure that Arizona is a state I stay far away from.
I want to visit Texas, just for the food. Nothing about the cowboy culture interests me, except steak and chili.Grats Arizona... you've displaced Texas as "The State that Most Scares Foreigners." :lol:
Steak and chili are definitely good reasons to go to Texas, if you're in the neighborhood.I want to visit Texas, just for the food. Nothing about the cowboy culture interests me, except steak and chili.
You're thinking of Maine, Gas. Maine gets all the zombies (and demonic dogs, and alien invasions, and homicidal clown creatures)
Vermont just gets cold.
Those states up there are itty bitty teeny weenie. New Hampshire is the only thing betwixt the two, and zombies don't respect borders. What New Englanders would call a drive across 3 states we Texans call "the morning commute."You're thinking of Maine, Gas. Maine gets all the zombies (and demonic dogs, and alien invasions, and homicidal clown creatures)
Vermont just gets cold.
That's a pretty stupid reason not to go to Arizona. It's not like you won't have your passport with you anyway...When I visit America, I'll be sure that Arizona is a state I stay far away from.
Those states up there are itty bitty teeny weenie. New Hampshire is the only thing betwixt the two, and zombies don't respect borders. What New Englanders would call a drive across 3 states we Texans call "the morning commute."[/QUOTE]You're thinking of Maine, Gas. Maine gets all the zombies (and demonic dogs, and alien invasions, and homicidal clown creatures)
Vermont just gets cold.
That only serves to strengthen my point - which was not that Texas is big, but that New England states are small.yeah whatever. Texas is tiny in comparison to my province.
That's a pretty stupid reason not to go to Arizona. It's not like you won't have your passport with you anyway...When I visit America, I'll be sure that Arizona is a state I stay far away from.
I want to visit Texas, just for the food. Nothing about the cowboy culture interests me, except steak and chili.[/QUOTE]Grats Arizona... you've displaced Texas as "The State that Most Scares Foreigners." :lol:
wait are you saying that when I'm driving down the road and get stopped by the police I'll have to present them with some form of identification? That's just crazy.Sweet! We get to re-live all those scenes from World War 2 movies!
Arizona police are going to have to work on their German accents, though.
"Papers, Please."
wait are you saying that when I'm driving down the road and get stopped by the police I'll have to present them with some form of identification? That's just crazy.[/QUOTE]Sweet! We get to re-live all those scenes from World War 2 movies!
Arizona police are going to have to work on their German accents, though.
"Papers, Please."
wait are you saying that when I'm driving down the road and get stopped by the police I'll have to present them with some form of identification? That's just crazy.[/QUOTE]Sweet! We get to re-live all those scenes from World War 2 movies!
Arizona police are going to have to work on their German accents, though.
"Papers, Please."
wait are you saying that when I'm driving down the road and get stopped by the police I'll have to present them with some form of identification? That's just crazy.[/QUOTE]Sweet! We get to re-live all those scenes from World War 2 movies!
Arizona police are going to have to work on their German accents, though.
"Papers, Please."
wait are you saying that when I'm driving down the road and get stopped by the police I'll have to present them with some form of identification? That's just crazy.[/QUOTE]Sweet! We get to re-live all those scenes from World War 2 movies!
Arizona police are going to have to work on their German accents, though.
"Papers, Please."
I remember a time in Chicago where my father (Thai/Indian) looks Hispanic with a beard. A cop stop him and ask for Greencard (back in 80s) and he left his wallet at home since he was just out for a stroll. He had to return to his apartment and get it while the cop follow him all the way home.There's prison time in the law even if you're legal but can't provide proof when it's demanded.
Is it actually jail time, or are you just detained until you can provide ID?There's prison time in the law even if you're legal but can't provide proof when it's demanded.
Is it actually jail time, or are you just detained until you can provide ID?[/QUOTE]There's prison time in the law even if you're legal but can't provide proof when it's demanded.
Is it actually jail time, or are you just detained until you can provide ID?[/QUOTE]There's prison time in the law even if you're legal but can't provide proof when it's demanded.
Is it actually jail time, or are you just detained until you can provide ID?[/QUOTE]But...if you are detained...and your ID is at home...and you don't live at the jail...I don't get how that would work.There's prison time in the law even if you're legal but can't provide proof when it's demanded.
Yes, but in Arizona "Driving While Mexican" is now a perfectly legal and valid reason to stop someone. At least make people WORK at hiding blatant profiling.Oh please, the police can stop anyone at anytime in any state and make up any kind of bullshit as to why they did it.
hehe.. fix it for yaYes, but in Arizona "Driving While Non-White" is now a perfectly legal and valid reason to stop someone. At least make people WORK at hiding blatant profiling.
shouldn't be too hard. All they have to do is a cop asking and jailing a legal citizen cause he/she left his/her wallet at home with no ID.Was listening to the radio this morning... the first wave of lawsuits are already starting over this...
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdfWhat I'm reading in this thread is contradicting what I'm hearing from other sources (though I've been so busy the last few days I haven't had time to look into it for myself). I'm hearing from other quarters that the cops won't just be able to pull someone over for being brown... it's that if they come across something tangible (presumably other than skin color) during the process of executing other investigations (IE, during a traffic stop) that leads them to suspect illegal status, they are to follow up now. Kinda like how the cops used to not be allowed to pull you OVER for not wearing your seat belt, but could nail you for it if they pulled you over for speeding or running a light. Of course, that didn't last, now they CAN pull you over for seat belt violations, as I found in 2004 to my chagrin.
Anybody got the pieces that say one way or the other?
actually... you CAN be stop for being brown since the "This section" including profiling and what is consider illegal conduct.So, in other words, it does seem to be that you have to be stopped/investigated for some other purpose, that you can't just be pulled over for being brown.
In related news, the Arizona \"birther\" law is tabled for now.
actually... you CAN be stop for being brown since the "This section" including profiling and what is consider illegal conduct.[/QUOTE]So, in other words, it does seem to be that you have to be stopped/investigated for some other purpose, that you can't just be pulled over for being brown.
In related news, the Arizona \\"birther\\" law is tabled for now.
actually... you CAN be stop for being brown since the "This section" including profiling and what is consider illegal conduct.[/QUOTE]So, in other words, it does seem to be that you have to be stopped/investigated for some other purpose, that you can't just be pulled over for being brown.
In related news, the Arizona \\\"birther\\\" law is tabled for now.
ENGLISH teachers unable to speak english correctly/understandably.Apparently, teachers in Arizona with accents considered too heavy get transferred.
I find that silly. I have met people who English is their 2nd language spoke BETTER than people with English as first (mainly I am guessing that they learn the correct way of speaking)Apparently, teachers in Arizona with accents considered too heavy get transferred.
ENGLISH teachers unable to speak english correctly/understandably.[/QUOTE]Apparently, teachers in Arizona with accents considered too heavy get transferred.
are you saying that an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT is not allowed in the state of Arizona? O_Ojust being IN the state and illegal immigrant is breaking the local law
Heh... I got that sarcasm. What I was trying to response to Gas is that some believe you have to violate traffic code before a cop can pull you over, but with this law, you look like illegal immigrant is good enough to pull you over.are you saying that an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT is not allowed in the state of Arizona? O_Ojust being IN the state and illegal immigrant is breaking the local law
My God the horrors.
Heh... I got that sarcasm. What I was trying to response to Gas is that some believe you have to violate traffic code before a cop can pull you over, but with this law, you look like illegal immigrant is good enough to pull you over.[/QUOTE]are you saying that an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT is not allowed in the state of Arizona? O_Ojust being IN the state and illegal immigrant is breaking the local law
My God the horrors.
Heh... I got that sarcasm. What I was trying to response to Gas is that some believe you have to violate traffic code before a cop can pull you over, but with this law, you look like illegal immigrant is good enough to pull you over.[/QUOTE]are you saying that an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT is not allowed in the state of Arizona? O_Ojust being IN the state and illegal immigrant is breaking the local law
My God the horrors.
I always wonder that if illegal immigrant was such a "bad" problem, the U.S. would have nip this in the bud long ago. With the article you gave, that is like government getting "extra money" that they don't have to pay back even if they do get a refund.Did you know a surprising amount of illegals pay income taxes? Even though they know they won't receive social security benefits, unemployment, and other benefits of paying income taxes. I know it isn't all of them, but it's a little surprising at how many do, even though they have no hope of a refund.
Interesting article. I wonder how would you "suspect" a person who is undocumented illegal if not by race or color?So.... what do they consider? What is the criteria for stopping someone who \"looks like they might be illegal\"?
I hope you don't mind, but I'm going with Politifacts checking of the Arizona bill rather than the author. I seem to remember another legal adviser who said waterboarding isn't torture.
Interesting article. I wonder how would you "suspect" a person who is undocumented illegal if not by race or color?[/QUOTE]So.... what do they consider? What is the criteria for stopping someone who \\\"looks like they might be illegal\\\"?
I hope you don't mind, but I'm going with Politifacts checking of the Arizona bill rather than the author. I seem to remember another legal adviser who said waterboarding isn't torture.
Interesting article. I wonder how would you "suspect" a person who is undocumented illegal if not by race or color?[/QUOTE]So.... what do they consider? What is the criteria for stopping someone who \\\\"looks like they might be illegal\\\\"?
I hope you don't mind, but I'm going with Politifacts checking of the Arizona bill rather than the author. I seem to remember another legal adviser who said waterboarding isn't torture.