Why waste time with that when there are more efficient ways to use that upper body strength:Oh my goooooooojd
Why waste time with that when there are more efficient ways to use that upper body strength:Oh my goooooooojd
I don’t think it’s that complex. Trump wants to get re-elected and he thinks this is the way to do it. This matters to his base, A LOT, and I believe he thinks that pleasing his base is the only thing that matters in November of 2020.You know, when I researched how to write mysteries, my favorite advice was asking yourself the question, "Who benefits?"
Most of Trump's actions are pretty clear: they benefit himself and all his billionaire buddies.
But I can't for the life of me figure out who benefits in a government shutdown.
Though someone else theorized he shut it down to stop the Democrats from accomplishing anything now that they have the House. Including pushing or supporting Mueller's investigation. Which wouldn't surprise me in the least.
It is expected that the Mueller report will be submitted in February. This about him getting the Senate in line to avoid impeachment. Remember the cheeto narrative is now, when we lied to the FBI about collusion it was an accident.I don’t think it’s that complex. Trump wants to get re-elected and he thinks this is the way to do it. This matters to his base, A LOT, and I believe he thinks that pleasing his base is the only thing that matters in November of 2020.
I feel like antagonizing the senate is a bad choice though. They all don't want this shutdown. They passed a bill unanimously back in December to avoid this.This about him getting the Senate in line to avoid impeachment.
https://t.co/Xnq3NAYoi6It is expected that the Mueller report will be submitted in February. This about him getting the Senate in line to avoid impeachment. Remember the cheeto narrative is now, when we lied to the FBI about collusion it was an accident.
Also Guilliani just said the White House gets to review and edit the report before Congress can see it.
The article that brought this to my attention then goes on to say: "This is 'a solution.' Is that your FINAL solution, Mr. Dobbs?"...In all seriousness here, you said that you would prefer -- you implied, at least, you would prefer he not declare a national emergency. I think it's the only way forward here. He is -- otherwise, there's not going to be a solution. There's no sense protracting this any longer than necessary [...] I really believe that the way forward here is for him to declare a national emergency, and simply sweep aside the recalcitrant left in this country. They have -- They have obstructed, resisted and subverted for far too long. The American people don't need to put up with this and the President needs to find a way forward here where he can deliver on his promise in advance of the 2020 Presidential election, because that means he will have fulfilled all of his major promises to the American people from the 2016 election.
Yeah. Four years ago, it was the right that was the obstructionists, and the Democrat president that was perpetrating unprecedented executive overreach. That pendulum just keeps swinging, and nobody ever thinks their own shit stinks. "It's not X when WE do it!"I always love how they call the left obstructionists. Really? REALLY?!?
But it works oh so well.In both situations it wasn't the democrats opposing a clean funding bill so "both sidesing" it is pretty stupid.
"It's not Unconstitutional when we do it." - BlotsfanIn both situations it wasn't the democrats opposing a clean funding bill so "both sidesing" it is pretty stupid.
How about accept the contitutional limitations of your office, and petition the American people that if they want progress made, they're going to need to vote in midterms too, and pay attention to more than just the first election on ballots?So serious question. When a congress publicly says that they would never under any circumstances work with a sitting president so that he could not get anything done, what is that president supposed to do to move the country forward? I understand that this paved the way for Trump, but laying the blame at the feet of Obama ignores the culpability of the republicans and does exactly what they wanted people to do - blame others for their obstructionism.
If you abandon contitutional democracy because the electorate is stupid, you never were in favor of democracy to begin with.I agree with that. But you are certainly assuming a lot about the intelligence and attention span of the populace. The right does what it does because stupid people who vote on emotions vote for them.
-heh- Yeah, you kinda got me on that one.If you abandon contitutional democracy because the electorate is stupid, you never were in favor of democracy to begin with.
PS: I finally tracked down where we had this EXACT CONVERSATION before, back when "President Trump" was still a hilarious hypothetical.
I didn't say "a" democracy. You're right, we don't have "a" democracy, we have a representative republic, the representatives of which are elected through a process also known as "democracy."Lol, we don’t have a democracy.
Those days were GLORIOUS.back when "President Trump" was still a hilarious hypothetical.
If we have an armed uprising that isn't squelched immediately, it will be because the military also turns against the government, so IDK about that. And saying we have representatives is fine, except most of the populace just votes for a letter on a page regardless of if the person they are voting for gives 2 shits about them, and then the person they vote for votes in favor of whichever business gives them the most money. So if by representative democracy, you mean Representative Kleptocracy, then sure.I didn't say "a" democracy. You're right, we don't have "a" democracy, we have a representative republic, the representatives of which are elected through a process also known as "democracy."
Unless you were asserting we don't have that, either, anymore.
In which case my reply is, "then it's a good thing we have private gun ownership."