Fuck you.
Fuckyoufuckyoufuckyou
FUCK. YOU.
I never react like that. I'm owed an outburst.Don't hold back, Hailey. Tell us how you really feel.
Too much flab, not enough muscle. Sumo is harder than it looks.
When I first saw this, I thought Trump won the Sumo contest.
The SEC is gonna absolutely destroy him and his lickspittles when he's finally out of office.His tariff tweet wiped $25,000,000,000.00 from the books of the auto industry in a single day.
Not to mention additional losses for produce, electronics, and don’t forget those Jarritos and Mexican pop.His tariff tweet wiped $25,000,000,000.00 from the books of the auto industry in a single day.
Lol no they won't.The SEC is gonna absolutely destroy him and his lickspittles when he's finally out of office.
Not that SEC.Lol no they won't.
I just went to go make this, but it seems someone else we know already had the same idea a year ago:Hmmm, economists have labeled the Mexico tariff as the single largest tax increase in history.
I suppose, just a round about unperceived tax on all goods purchased by civilians. Is that a value added tax?
I just want to reiterate, just in case anyone has forgotten, that there's credible allegations that DT raped a 13 year old.
Someone should tell that to this guy, who wants us to go back to the moon:
Which is a gross misrepresentation of what anyone at NASA would say. This is a pathetic attempt at a strawman.Okay, I actually do see what he was trying to say. Does not stop the fact he still can barely handle the english language, but basically he was saying the goal should be to reach Mars, with habitation of the Moon being a stepping stone to that goal, rather then the goal itself.
Okay, I just thought I would point it out. I don't agree with him.Which is a gross misrepresentation of what anyone at NASA would say. This is a pathetic attempt at a strawman.
Why would you give him your help? Why would you point out the "logic" in a statement that is inherently a logical fallacy?Okay, I just thought I would point it out. I don't agree with him.
I just wanted to add context. It's easy to point out he barely knows how to talk, we don't need to also willfully misunderstand just because we don't like him.Why would you give him your help? Why would you point out the "logic" in a statement that is inherently a logical fallacy?