Brits are the worst kind of tourists. At the hotel where I used to work at, we knew, as soon as more then 2 Brits would book a room/rooms we would be in for a treat. Wasted at checkin and almost always dead drunk at checkout. Housekeeping was always pissed after cleaning the rooms.
Funny Pictures Thread. It begins again
- Thread starter CrimsonSoul
- Start date
Me too. They all look so tasty. *purrrr*
I mean, it doesn't matter to me, but you should probably explicitly say nsfw.How much snow you guys get?
GasBandit
Staff member
Preferable to a trademark lawsuit.
It’s a half measure, though. They should have either spelled the whole name or else said “crisped rice and marshmallow treat.”
...and yes, I know fake science fair projects are a thing.
—Patrick
Go to the comments to see the entire story arc where shit gets cray.
What comments?
figmentPez
Staff member
Hunger makes things taste better.It's stupid but I chuckled.
Nostalgia makes things funnier.
*Klinger.
Jeez, get it right. "Clinger" would be a whole different person.
--Patrick
Oh, I thought that was the same Imgur post I saw earlier. Here's a direct link to the gallery I was talking about.
Even for a Prince in pre-revolutionary France, his toilet would have basically been a very nice privy, meaning it would have been a wooden seat over a hole leading either to a sewer or a midden heap. No thankfully no transmogrified plumbing.The horrifying truth none of us realized..
or a guy carrying a bucket
GasBandit
Staff member
But his other brothers can't deny.
Let's see...
1. No, but I'd say a part of the slogan's missing
2. No.
3. No.
4. Ehhh...Not by Google - the algorythm shows what it's given. It speaks volumes to the amount of profiling and stuff still embedded in the system.
5. Took me a moment, since I first read it as him being the author. Supposing she wrote it, it could definitely be racist, though I'd say it depends on if he's offended. It can certainly work as ajoke among friends, or it can be horrible.
6. No, just bad testing.
7. NNNNnnnn..Hmmm....No?
8. Yes. Though probably something something "other times", but still using that as a tool to teach the letters in this era would be pretty wrong.
9. I dunno, does he have a dog named Snickers? If so, unfortunate - or deliberate - choice of name, of course, but not inherently racist.
10. I'm going to have to guess the algorythm gone and fucked up again. Racism is deliberate, so, no. Something for Google techs to check out, though.
11. A bit of an edge case - similar to the H&M sweater a while ago. The black face was probably included for diversity purposes, but what face goes with which onesie is still important. It could be deliberate and racist, but I'm more inclined to consider it a faux pas.
12. No, just a horrible editor and/or cover designer.
13. No, this pretty much falls into "Engrish" type of bad decision making.
14. No, a bad designer, possibly.
1. No, but I'd say a part of the slogan's missing
2. No.
3. No.
4. Ehhh...Not by Google - the algorythm shows what it's given. It speaks volumes to the amount of profiling and stuff still embedded in the system.
5. Took me a moment, since I first read it as him being the author. Supposing she wrote it, it could definitely be racist, though I'd say it depends on if he's offended. It can certainly work as ajoke among friends, or it can be horrible.
6. No, just bad testing.
7. NNNNnnnn..Hmmm....No?
8. Yes. Though probably something something "other times", but still using that as a tool to teach the letters in this era would be pretty wrong.
9. I dunno, does he have a dog named Snickers? If so, unfortunate - or deliberate - choice of name, of course, but not inherently racist.
10. I'm going to have to guess the algorythm gone and fucked up again. Racism is deliberate, so, no. Something for Google techs to check out, though.
11. A bit of an edge case - similar to the H&M sweater a while ago. The black face was probably included for diversity purposes, but what face goes with which onesie is still important. It could be deliberate and racist, but I'm more inclined to consider it a faux pas.
12. No, just a horrible editor and/or cover designer.
13. No, this pretty much falls into "Engrish" type of bad decision making.
14. No, a bad designer, possibly.