You might just be getting your wish, you angry, angry little man.There's your official tyranny, gun nuts!
Don't tread on me? The people of Ferguson are being trod upon, and HARD.
Go get 'em! Stop talking and get to shooting.
Or is that rhetoric all just a big bag of bullshit?
FTFY. Historically, anyway.It's not tyranny until it happens by rich white folks, eh?
Which isn't what he was trying to say.FTFY. Historically, anyway.
--Patrick
Unfortunately, the only thing being reported is the looters, but what people are uploading, tweeting, that other social media stuff, shows sniper rifles aimed at people gathering on campuses and churches holding signs and police shooting rubber bullets and gas door-to-door. So while there are definitely civilians causing problems, there are also police causing problems, and they seem to want to take it out on the peaceful protestors and journalists. Seriously, why arrest the journalists if the police are doing nothing wrong? They know what they're doing, and videos have caught them saying "stop videotaping us" and the like.You might just be getting your wish, you angry, angry little man.
Gun sales spike in Missouri
http://rt.com/usa/180084-gun-sales-ferguson-protests/
However, it seems the demonstraters of Ferguson would rather help themselves to free rims and electronics, steal ATMs, loot convenience stores, and burn local businesses to the ground.
The moral high ground is getting bulldozed fast.
Your argument got kinda destroyed already. A direct rebuttal to that article: http://www.mediaite.com/online/libertarians-have-not-been-silent-about-ferguson/Good article here asking a pretty obvious question that I for one had missed:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...hy-arent-libertarians-talking-about-ferguson/
Seriously. Libertarians, or Ancaps or sovereign citizens, love to get tumescent about overreach of police. So right now, where are they? It's almost as if their libertarian views only apply to whites.
This is why common law is such a terrible idea.
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/ne...ence_escapes_jail_for_18th_assault/?ref=var_0
The UK will send you to jail for mean tweets but won't imprison a woman for her 18th assault conviction.
Florida prison guards lock 50 year old mentally ill inmate in the shower with the hot water on full blast till he dies, because he crapped in his cell.
It it's just Exxon and BP, they'll hire Xi and just start gunning down people who get too close. The Iraqi's won't go against them in real force because THAT would bring us in.Dear god no. Do not go back . It took EVERYTHING just to get out of there after all the money, record oil company profits and dead military members, we can't afford to get stuck there again.
Although in the end if they are threatening the oils fields at all I'm sure the heads of Exxon and BP will be sending our troops in STAT so fuck everyone else.
Sounds like a good argument for staying forever! Yay! Let's never leave because we will, NEVER leave if we keep up this line of thinking. At some point we have to say, we've made a huge mistake and we obviously can't stay here without basically colonizing this place. Because thats the alternative. Stay there forever and run the place (colonize) or leave. There's not really a terrible lot of middle ground.At least this time we'd be in the right. Actually, this is exactly the kind of thing that the UN should be stepping up for. It has nothing to do with oil. As we all know, the gulf wars did NOT procure any oil for the US, but our reasons for going in in the past were murky at best and illegal at worst (and most likely). This time there would be a clear moral and ethical aim, with a clear and defined enemy that is not wanted in the country.
I know we just got out of there, but it's our fault that ISIS is in power. We have a responsibility to shoulder here whether we like it or not.
Oh, I agree there's a huge problem, and even that we in part created it but all I'm saying is we will always have a "reason" to stay there forever. Always. At some point we have to own our mistake and move on. Or stay forever. I don't really see any possible middle ground.When does doing nothing become tacit approval? I realize this is selective, considering Syria, the Congo, Rwanda, etc. The difference, though, is that in this case we went into a country, deposed the ruler, and then left with a power vacuum that is being filled by a group of individuals who have been deemed too radical by fucking Al Qaeda! That's like a group being called too intolerant by the Westboro Baptist Church.
ISIS is not a group that threatens a single area, but instead the entire region in the middle east.