When I was 19, working in IT, I knew a guy who got busted and had to do community service at the DMV. I got him to steal a bunch of blank laminates (the driver's license laminates at the time had the magnetic strip backing built in, so they'd print out the front of your license and stick it in and laminate it, and then program the back). Using the BRAND NEW STATE OF THE ART technological innovations of "photoshop" and "color laser printers" (our color laser at work was the size of a car), I was able to alter our "real" driver's licenses to add 2 years to our ages (changing 1979 to 1977 on our DOBs) for him, me, and 10 or so of our closest friends.I got booze sometimes but it was a lot harder before I had a close friend turn 21.
That's because the government regulates the distribution and sale of alcohol (a legal drug) but does NOT regulate the distribution and sale of illegal drugs, and therefore has no official records of where they come from nor where they go, QED.Are you actually telling me that the government can't stop illegal drugs from getting to people, but it can stop teenagers from getting their hands on alcohol?
Actually, i'm pretty sure it's more about the amount of profits that can be made with the illegal ones, vs the ones you can just buy legally...That's because the government regulates the distribution and sale of alcohol (a legal drug) but does NOT regulate the distribution and sale of illegal drugs, and therefore has no official records of where they come from nor where they go, QED.
--Patrick
Well, there was this one time...If alcohol had the same profits you'd see it sold illegally too
Yeah, I see the signs for test strips all over.Black markets for stuff that's sold legally do exist.
You mean like how a Fox Business Analyst said torture worked on McCain, or how a White House aid mocked him by saying he was dying anyways? That is some messed up shit.It feels like they're tripling and quadrupling down on the evil, corrupt, and inhuman this week.
Fuck it. I'll push the button myself and we're all burn together when we burn.
Obviously you have more drunk driver accidents by the young then 'MURICA then...I live in a place where the legal drinking age is the same for all those other legal things like smoking or dying for your country. Legal drinking age being 21 has always baffled me.
But god help you if you say anything about Huckabee's eye shadow. Fuck them.You mean like how a Fox Business Analyst said torture worked on McCain, or how a White House aid mocked him by saying he was dying anyways? That is some messed up shit.
Slightly higher percentage than the US, but I believe that has as much to do with Canada being a spread out mess of a country with pure garbage public transportation. Access to quality public transportation seems to really carve a large percent off of incidents. Many European nations for example that have a higher amount of binge drinking per capita, yet lower drunk driving issues.Obviously you have more drunk driver accidents by the young then 'MURICA then...
...where they come from nor where they go...
Actually there is a lot of illegal alcohol being sold, even in 'wet' areas. Mostly Moonshine is made now to avoid the crazy high taxes (sin tax) on liquor. Also another reason for Moonshine is that it is available when you are ready to buy. I get a little upset at the Blue Laws here when I finish a bottle of Bourbon on a Saturday evening and have to wait two more days to purchase more.Actually, i'm pretty sure it's more about the amount of profits that can be made with the illegal ones, vs the ones you can just buy legally...
If alcohol had the same profits you'd see it sold illegally too, even if it still was legally available.
Black markets for stuff that's sold legally do exist.
While it's an interesting anecdote, and I agree literally with the first part, I'd suggest that it wasn't meant to stop alcohol trade, but to reduce it. It would be interesting to look at other key indicators, such as alcoholism, drunk driving, and assault compared to nearby counties.So being a dry county didn't stop the sale or consumption of alcohol, but it DID create a situation where a dude was willing to shoot two young guys he knew fairly well because they didn't call before dropping by.
Yeah, i mean, remember the good times back when everyone just blamed individuals for stuff, and the crime rate was like way down... oh, wait!But that does seem to be a continuing shift in society, moving responsibility from the individual to society, government, institutions, etc.
Hey look! @Li3n picked the PEAK OF THE GRAPH to start from!!Yeah, i mean, remember the good times back when everyone just blamed individuals for stuff, and the crime rate was like way down... oh, wait!
While it's an interesting anecdote, and I agree literally with the first part, I'd suggest that it wasn't meant to stop alcohol trade, but to reduce it. It would be interesting to look at other key indicators, such as alcoholism, drunk driving, and assault compared to nearby counties.
The second part is an interesting implication, that the law is responsible for the dangerous situation, shifting responsibility from the individuals to the state. While side effects are common, and must be balanced against the other intended effects of legislation, the responsibility lies with the individual(s) taking action.
But that does seem to be a continuing shift in society, moving responsibility from the individual to society, government, institutions, etc.
Depends on demand and that person’s definition of “acceptable risk.”It's also an interesting assumption that he wouldn't be involved in illegal business if the county wasn't dry. If it wasn't, there would be no market for boot legging, so would he not be involved in illegal but lucrative business or would he be selling some other contraband?
The first American online betting site. Other countries are already a few years ahead.Supreme Court overturns federal ban on sports betting.
I expect the first legal online betting site to be up in about 30 minutes.
Hey, don’t spoil the ending! I haven’t seen this one yet!Hmm...will there soon be a corresponding increase on taxation of gambling winnings?
Hmmmm...
—Patrick