Another Simpsons reality.Imagine arguing FOR asbestos. SMH.
Steinman/Strawman has been back a few times for single posts, but nothing political/religious. Trying to defend Trump with a strict religious background is just a losing proposition.Has it been 6 years since we saw Steinman? Feels like it was just yesterday he was arguing some stupid rightwing nonsense.
My step dad used to work for a chemical plant. There's lots of toxic stuff in plants and factories that get used as catalysts, intermediary ingredients, etc. No getting around that. But consumer goods, obviously, shouldn't be toxic. Things like lead paint in walls or lead in gasoline, asbestos insulation, etc. And toxic stuff used in manufacture should have strict safety measures for worker and environmental safety.Steinman/Strawman has been back a few times for single posts, but nothing political/religious. Trying to defend Trump with a strict religious background is just a losing proposition.
Also, without playing devil's advocate - asbestos' unique properties do mean it can still have its uses. Obviously not in any residential/school/etc environment, to be very clear.
I've rewatched the collapse about a dozen times, specifically to see if there were any cars crossing at the time. And it doesn't look like a single vehicle was crossing. Which is a miracle.Footage of the collision
By oust, they won't use her on air. She'll just be paid her 300,000.00 a year salary for sitting at home and doing shitty talking head paid work elsewhere.
She might have a non-compete. If that is so, then it's 300k a year to sit home and do nothing, which is still better than having her do this somewhere else.By oust, they won't use her on air. She'll just be paid her 300,000.00 a year salary for sitting at home and doing shitty talking head paid work elsewhere.