It's corporate oligarchs. The 700 billionaires or so in the USA and really it would just take peter thiel, Elon musk, the Koch brothers, Jeff bozos, and the Waltons to really decide they wanted everything.
It's corporate oligarchs. The 700 billionaires or so in the USA and really it would just take peter thiel, Elon musk, the Koch brothers, Jeff bozos, and the Waltons to really decide they wanted everything.
Moving this here since I don't think it's welcome in the other thread.With the facts laid out I think that he definitely gets to say
Yeah because blaming the running back is idiotic. The idea that the left is responsible for Harris losing is a fucking stupid opinion. The left was saying that the Harris campaign strategy was a bad idea.
This is something I've been musing over. I don't think the results of this last election are going to move the Democrats to the left. The amount of minorities who decided economic matters supersede social matters is somewhat surprising, and I think Democrats are more likely to work to get them back than they are to getting closer to progressives.Disagree on pointing fingers being pointless. After a defeat this fucking catastrophic is when you need to get rid of things holding the party back. To just come together and say “we’ll get em next time champ” is what happened in 2016 and set up the current catastrophe. No now’s the perfect time for recriminations and deciding on who needs to get the fuck out of the drivers seat cause they’re driving off the cliff and their idiocy has been fully exposed.
Except it’s entirely pointless to blame the running back and you look like a fool doing it. Either they are important enough to be part of the strategy or you don’t get to blame them for the loss.Moving this here since I don't think it's welcome in the other thread.
I think we may have been talking past each other, to a point. When I say blame the running back, I don't mean pin the majority of blame on the running back. I mean, blame them for being irresponsible with their vote.
Saw it, responded meanly and then deleted my mean response. Didn’t really see anything to discuss in it.I don't know if you saw my edit, but I listed what I think are the main factors to Harris losing. I do maintain that if you don't vote, you don't get to point fingers.
Oh I’m under no delusions that the democrats will move to the left. They didn’t after they lost to Bush and Trump. Fuck they didn’t even move left when Obama ran a lefty campaign and won huge.This is something I've been musing over. I don't think the results of this last election are going to move the Democrats to the left. The amount of minorities who decided economic matters supersede social matters is somewhat surprising, and I think Democrats are more likely to work to get them back than they are to getting closer to progressives.
I could be wrong, but I don't think anything "moves" (individual) Democrats to the right/left, it's more about the quantity of people who identify as right-/left-leaning that decide to register as Democrats/leave the Democratic Party....democrats will move to the left...
...pulling the democrats rightward...
You are wrong. You can look at Harris herself to see how she in particular ran in the primary vrs how she ran in the general. Which couldn’t possibly have been based on any kind of indepth analysis of the number of people who joined the Democratic Party vrs. How many people left the Democratic Party. It was a strategy that was chosen based off where the country is at. And it was a strategy that has show itself as unfounded in reality.I could be wrong, but I don't think anything "moves" (individual) Democrats to the right/left, it's more about the quantity of people who identify as right-/left-leaning that decide to register as Democrats/leave the Democratic Party.
--Patrick