Export thread

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-ring-there-is-no-god-but-allah/

WE GOT HIM FINALLY YES

I wear a cross my mom gave me, I'm also not a Catholic.

Frank said:

I wear a cross my mom gave me, I'm also not a Catholic.

Click to expand...

I have a pentagram on my shirt but I'm not satan.

At least, you can't prove I am.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-ring-there-is-no-god-but-allah/

WE GOT HIM FINALLY YES

Click to expand...

GasBandit said:

I have a pentagram on my shirt but I'm not satan.

At least, you can't prove I am.

Click to expand...

I have a swastica tattoed on my forehead, but I'm not Hitler.

GasBandit said:

I have a pentagram on my shirt but I'm not satan.

At least, you can't prove I am.

Click to expand...

Well, I remember hearing that the Devil often wears a pleasant face. So you should be safe

wow, what a reach. Hopefully they can get a picture of a ring with Arabic Script on it next time.

Honestly I hope that if he wins the election he just says "yep, I've been Muslim this whole time. What're you gonna do about it?"

I am still shocked that people still think God and Allah are two different things...

sixpackshaker said:

I am still shocked that people still think God and Allah are two different things...

Click to expand...

Thanks a lot. Now there's going to be riots and murders and it's all going to be the fault of Michelangelo, and his picture of Allah.

blotsfan said:

Honestly I hope that if he wins the election he just says "yep, I've been Muslim this whole time. What're you gonna do about it?"

Click to expand...

The moment he wins the second term, the entire GoP is going to move to scramble to spend the next 4yrs on Impeachment plans.

I have a stain on my t-shirt in which you can pencil in an upside down cross... guess i must be the Pope. Man, that explains this weird hat i'm wearing.

@Li3n said:

I have a stain on my t-shirt in which you can pencil in an upside down cross... guess i must be the Pope.

Click to expand...

Or a confused satanist who doesn't understand christian symbology.

I wear a top with a semen stain on it. I guess that means I'm Monica Lewinsky?

I wear t-shirts from an elementary school, doesn't mean I still go there. Seriously, I still have a shirt that fits me from Elementary school field day. The shirts they give out at those things are HUGE!

I put something that someone wears as jewelry constantly for decades above the focus I put on which shirts I wear.

That being said, this sounds like the whole "the Coca-cola logo is anti-islam" thing that happened a decade ago. I actually found an old article on it: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Muslims-see-red-over-Coke-logo/articleshow/26950804.cms

In other words, a load of horseshit, but amusing to see.

I'm still waiting for the Satanic president. Well...openly satanic president.

I think Mr. Black has a few interesting ideas about who should be our next president.

Yoshimickster said:

I'm still waiting for the Satanic president. Well...openly satanic president.

Click to expand...

Sorry, Cheney only made VP.

Ravenpoe said:

Sorry, Cheney only made VP.

Click to expand...

He said Satanic, not Satan himself.

I freaking love Lewis Black. Tells it like it is.

Edit: What the hell is with Cheney's scowl? How could anyone see him as not evil after seeing that death glare?

I love the poll at the bottom of that page. Results are about what you'd expect.

I die a little bit inside every time I hear about stuff like this.

What I find interesting is the same people who are screaming that Obama is not a Christian (which he is) are the same ones voting Romney, who is a Mormon.

Dave said:

What I find interesting is the same people who are screaming that Obama is not a Christian (which he is) are the same ones voting Romney, who is a Mormon.

Click to expand...

Oh man, watching these people contort themselves into knots to explain why they are voting for a Mormon (in case you don't know, evangelical Christianity tends to consider the LDS church to be a cult and is usually VERY vocal about it) is amusing. Usually it is something like, "Well, I'd rather vote for a Mormon than a secret Muslim!"

Oh, hello racism.

How've you been?

Bowielee said:

Oh, hello racism.

How've you been?

Click to expand...

just making the Supreme Court strike down Affirmative Action, no big whoop

You know what would be a neutral presidency? A Bhudist president. Nothing good will happen, nothing bad will happen, I'd take nothing happening over another Bush style presidency.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

just making the Supreme Court strike down Affirmative Action, no big whoop

Click to expand...

And assuming that minorities can't make it in the big bad world because they're minorities, and therefore need special consideration, isn't racist (correction: bigoted)?

Dave said:

I love the poll at the bottom of that page. Results are about what you'd expect.

Click to expand...

Totalling 106% at the moment. Lovely rounding errors, mate!

GasBandit said:

Or a confused satanist who doesn't understand christian symbology.

Click to expand...

C'mon dude, i think we argued enough for you to know that cracked is where i know about the pope/inverted cross thing. Although weirdly i did know about St. Peter cross being upside down (and St Andrew's being an X), i just never connected it in my head with satanists...

Eriol said:

I put something that someone wears as jewelry constantly for decades above the focus I put on which shirts I wear.

Click to expand...

I think you misunderstood my criticism... the important part was " you can pencil in"...

And the lines they drew don't even look like the text they put next to it... Poe's Law in effect man.

papachronos said:

And assuming that minorities can't make it in the big bad world because they're minorities, and therefore need special consideration, isn't racist (correction: bigoted)?

Click to expand...

nah, affirmative action isn't racist

Looks like it's time for another episode of the "Only white people can be racist" thread! /laughtrack

Charlie Don't Surf said:

nah, affirmative action isn't racist

Click to expand...

So favoring one person over another purely due to the color of their skin isn't racist? Good to know.

Covar said:

So favoring one person over another purely due to the color of their skin isn't racist? Good to know.

Click to expand...

Yeah, it's not like there's any historical reason why some minorities might need to be afforded more protection under the law against discrimination then the majority.

I mean if there are two people just as qualified for a position and i always choose the white one that's not indicative of any bias on my part at all.


Yeah, just because affirmative action isn't perfect doesn't mean you can get rid of it without replacing with something else to offset the discrimination.

I get so tired of the "gotcha" of affirmative action being itself racist.

Affirmative action doesn't promote people because of the color of their skin(racist), it affords them opportunities that would otherwise be denied them because of the color of their skin(equal opportunity). There's a world of difference between the two.

Bowielee said:

I get so tired of the "gotcha" of affirmative action being itself racist.

Affirmative action doesn't promote people because of the color of their skin(racist), it affords them opportunities that would otherwise be denied them because of the color of their skin(equal opportunity). There's a world of difference between the two.

Click to expand...

It may not be racist, per se, but it is prejudiced. It pre-judges people based upon their role as a member of a group, rather than their strengths and weaknesses as an individual. Affirmative action seeks to solve a problem (I won't hire you because you're this race/sex/ethnicity/sexual orientation) by applying the same problem in reverse (I have to hire a certain number of this race/sex/ethnicity/orientation). This does not result in more equality - at best, it's a break even, and at worst, it could result in the hiring of people unqualified to hold a position, just to meet a quota.

Affirmative action is a band-aid on top of a festering infection - it doesn't solve the problem, it just hides it for a while. Discrimination will always be present, and forcing those who would not hire (or promote, or admit, etc) a black man (for instance) to do so won't change that fact. In fact, it makes it worse - that person then carries with them the stigma of being hired/promoted/admitted within a system that uses affirmative action, and everyone, including himself, will wonder if he actually earned it or if he was just one of a number.

papachronos said:

It may not be racist, per se, but it is prejudiced. It pre-judges people based upon their role as a member of a group, rather than their strengths and weaknesses as an individual. Affirmative action seeks to solve a problem (I won't hire you because you're this race/sex/ethnicity/sexual orientation) by applying the same problem in reverse (I have to hire a certain number of this race/sex/ethnicity/orientation). This does not result in more equality - at best, it's a break even, and at worst, it could result in the hiring of people unqualified to hold a position, just to meet a quota.

Affirmative action is a band-aid on top of a festering infection - it doesn't solve the problem, it just hides it for a while. Discrimination will always be present, and forcing those who would not hire (or promote, or admit, etc) a black man (for instance) to do so won't change that fact. In fact, it makes it worse - that person then carries with them the stigma of being hired/promoted/admitted within a system that uses affirmative action, and everyone, including himself, will wonder if he actually earned it or if he was just one of a number.

Click to expand...

Which is totally why doing nothing is so much better...

If anything just by forcing people to interact with a minority it has a positive impact (there's a reason why segregated schools existed, much easier to dismiss someone you don't interact with).

Also, actual quotas are illegal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action#Quotas

Covar said:

So favoring one person over another purely due to the color of their skin isn't racist? Good to know.

Click to expand...

Affirmative action specifically only requires that workplaces and colleges don't discriminate against race. There's nothing about quotas etc... That's all red-tap crap universities make up internally so they can say they follow Affirmative action guidelines.

But I thought racial discrimination was already prohibited by the civil rights act? Why pass multiple laws that prohibit the same thing? Or is "affirmative action" the name for policies implemented to comply with the CRA?

"Affirmative action" sounds to me like it was so named because the intent is to take action to affirm those who are members of a demographic that has historically been downtrodden. Either that, or to point out that this implementation is active (requiring a specific behavior) rather than passive (prohibiting a specific behavior). I honestly don't know. Regardless, I think it's treating a symptom rather than the disease.

If what Silent Bob says is true, then I should clarify my statement so that it applies to the implementation of it.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

civil rights just allowed an end to segregation. It didn't force companies to actually hire black people.

I'm okay with affirmative action, but I don't like it when under achievers get it. I knew a guy who had an Affirmative action scholarship for Drexel, wasted it all on drugs & cheap alcohol.

everyone stop the presses, whew, thank god papachronos is here to let us know that racism is over

unfurls banner "RACISM IS OVER", confetti goes off everywhere that hispanic people clean up later

Yoshimickster said:

I'm okay with affirmative action, but I don't like it when under achievers get it. I knew a guy who had an Affirmative action scholarship for Drexel, wasted it all on drugs & cheap alcohol.

Click to expand...

spoiler: everyone wastes scholarships, not just minorities. I'm a white dude with privilege bingo and I got a full ride and almost kicked out after 2 semesters.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

everyone stop the presses, whew, thank god papachronos is here to let us know that racism is over

unfurls banner "RACISM IS OVER", confetti goes off everywhere that hispanic people clean up later

Click to expand...

Now, Charlie, you seem like a decent guy, and I think that your concern is probably honest. But I don't know why you seem to enjoy creating discord around here. You know very well that I never said racism is over, but you put those words in my mouth anyway. So I go back to that old chestnut:

STFU Charlie.

As an aside, anyone else find that the word "racism" is starting to reach the point of verbal satiation? Repeated so often that it's ceased to have any meaning? There's plenty of bigotry still around, and prejudice along cultural lines, and those problems need to be addressed. But seriously, stop crying RACISM over every perceived injustice. It's getting old.

papachronos said:

Now, Charlie, you seem like a decent guy, and I think that your concern is probably honest. But I don't know why you seem to enjoy creating discord around here. You know very well that I never said racism is over, but you put those words in my mouth anyway. So I go back to that old chestnut:

STFU Charlie.

As an aside, anyone else find that the word "racism" is starting to reach the point of verbal satiation? Repeated so often that it's ceased to have any meaning? There's plenty of bigotry still around, and prejudice along cultural lines, and those problems need to be addressed. But seriously, stop crying RACISM over every perceived injustice. It's getting old.

Click to expand...

I agree. Often times you see the "race card" played when a swindler's bluff is called. For example: I've worked the returns counter at Wal-Mart as a kid; a black lady attempting to return obviously worn and used items for store credit and being refused will instantly devolve into an argument of discrimination and require management to get involved. It's almost like clockwork, if you call-out a con artist or a thief, they get embarrassed and try to slough off that shame onto you (or they kick and scream until they get their way).

No ma'am, I'm hardly a racist, but you are a thief and a liar.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

spoiler: everyone wastes scholarships, not just minorities. I'm a white dude with privilege bingo and I got a full ride and almost kicked out after 2 semesters.

Click to expand...

Not everyone wastes scholarships....right? Come on, someone help my all-ready fading trust in the educational system! And by "fading" I mean knocked down at least 300 pegs.

So check out what the Florida board of education is doing. Racism isn't over, it's just been undercut by the left's "soft" racism of lowered expectations.

GasBandit said:

So check out what the Florida board of education is doing. Racism isn't over, it's just been undercut by the left's "soft" racism of lowered expectations.

Click to expand...

As someone who lives in a country with almost no black people i can tell you that education getting worse is just a global thing...

To anyone who opposes affirmative action on its face (not how it gets implemented,d not specific policies, but the very concept) I ask one simple question: Do you really believe that that 350-ish years worth of legal oppression, discrimination, and abuses (250 years of Slavery, 100 of general inequality and denial of Civil Rights) has been undone in the last fifty-ish years? That the inequalities built into the system and the cultural biases that accumulated have been satisfactorily eliminated? If you answer yes, then you're heart's in the right place but I question your understanding of the issues at play. If your answer is no, I have to wonder what you'd replace it with to correct for those issues.

Norris said:

Do you really believe that that 350-ish years worth of legal oppression, discrimination, and abuses has been undone in the last fifty-ish years? ... If your answer is no, I have to wonder what you'd replace it with to correct for those issues.

Click to expand...

No, but two wrongs does not make a right. Just because somebody did not start on equal footing with me does not mean that it's right to give the other an advantage to make up for the built-in disadvantage they started with. Yes it sucks, but taking from me for no reason but my race is wrong, even if I started out with an advantage due to "cultural biases" or anything else. I didn't do anything, and I'm playing by the rules, thus it's not just to treat me differently, good or bad. You don't get to "correct for those issues" after-the-fact by doing wrong things more, just to somebody else, usually who had nothing to do with the original acts.

Eriol said:

No, but two wrongs does not make a right. Just because somebody did not start on equal footing with me does not mean that it's right to give the other an advantage to make up for the built-in disadvantage they started with. Yes it sucks, but taking from me for no reason but my race is wrong, even if I started out with an advantage due to "cultural biases" or anything else. I didn't do anything, and I'm playing by the rules, thus it's not just to treat me differently, good or bad. You don't get to "correct for those issues" after-the-fact by doing wrong things more, just to somebody else, usually who had nothing to do with the original acts.

Click to expand...

Then the issues will never be corrected. Or at least not for many generations.

Additionally, in terms of higher education, the Supreme Court has laid down rules regarding the use of Affirmative Action in the selection of students. Giving someone points just for their race is unconstitutional, considering race as a factor is not. The idea being that, when things are roughly equal, they can go with the black kid. I don't find that to be particularly unfair to white applicants.

Norris said:

The idea being that, when things are roughly equal, they can go with the black kid. I don't find that to be particularly unfair to white applicants.

Click to expand...

My question, then, is what is a fair proportion of white vs. minority, assuming things are "roughly equal"? Do they go with the black kid 60% of the time? 80%? What percentage equals out the disadvantages faced by everyone in the minority demographic? How is this percentage determined? Because if it's just enacted on a basis of "until it looks/feels right" then whatever "feels right" will differ depending on the preferences and prejudices of the people on the admissions board - which leaves it open to abuse on one side or the other, and kind of defeats the purpose.

A little more research showed that the State of Michigan outlawed affirmative action in 2006 subsequent to the 2003 Supreme Court rulings, based on the University of Michigan's policies, that defined the use of affirmative action in university admissions. The very next year, minority admissions to U of M dropped by 25%. But hey, things were a little more fair to white people, so justice was done.

Norris said:

A little more research showed that the State of Michigan outlawed affirmative action in 2006 subsequent to the 2003 Supreme Court rulings, based on the University of Michigan's policies, that defined the use of affirmative action in university admissions. The very next year, minority admissions to U of M dropped by 25%. But hey, things were a little more fair to white people, so justice was done.

Click to expand...

So you mean when a policy that expressly benefited the admission of one group and artificially raised it regardless of merit was removed, that one group's admission went down? Shocking.

I love that we as a culture ask people to pull themselves up by their boot straps, when they have no shoes, and we as a culture are standing on their necks.

Norris said:

A little more research showed that the State of Michigan outlawed affirmative action in 2006 subsequent to the 2003 Supreme Court rulings, based on the University of Michigan's policies, that defined the use of affirmative action in university admissions. The very next year, minority admissions to U of M dropped by 25%. But hey, things were a little more fair to white people, so justice was done.

Click to expand...

I know snark is the common language of Halforums, but I actually have hope that some understanding can be gained here - I'm simply asking what percentage of time taking the black kid over the white kid is "fair."

Regarding the study you cited - did the State of Michigan outlaw affirmative action for the UM-Ann Arbor alone, or the entire UM system statewide, or all state-funded universities? What was the effect of the legislation on overall minority admissions to all state universities in Michigan? You can't cherry pick the stats for UM-Ann Arbor if the legislation affected all state-funded universities in Michigan.

BTW, I'm asking these questions honestly - unlike a lot of folks who seem to beat their heads together about political things, I'm willing to change my opinion if I can be convinced. I'm arguing from what seems logical to me right now, not because of any "right vs left" thing.

Also, I've been hanging around for a long time, but you're all just icons to me - are there any minorities on the board who have an opinion and are willing to share it? Right now it seems like a lot of folks who aren't terribly affected one way or the other arguing over this - but what more should I expect in a political subforum?

sixpackshaker said:

I love that we as a culture ask people to pull themselves up by their boot straps, when they have no shoes, and we as a culture are standing on their necks.

Click to expand...

The white guilt! It burns! It burns!

Let me riposte in kind then - I love how the narrative is that it is impossible for anyone who isn't white to achieve anything on their own, so they need their (largely white) government benefactors to manage their lives, provide their choices, opportunities and achievements for them, because they can't be expected to function as adult human beings.

Or you know, counteract the bullshit that we do.

sixpackshaker said:

Or you know, counteract the bullshit that we do.

Click to expand...

Speak for yourself, bud.

sixpackshaker said:

Or you know, counteract the bullshit that we do.

Click to expand...

You should just stop being a racist then. This way we wouldn't need to counteract your bullshit!

Is it fair that because of race quotas, Asian students have to score significantly higher on the SAT to have a hope of admission?

No because they're not white!

I just imagine the whole Affirmative Action thing to be about the standard D&D races and it suddenly seems much funnier and less depressing.

I had to start limiting the number of elves in my parties, because they are too bloody boring. Not to mention the players that run them tend to be rules rapists.

Eriol said:

No, but two wrongs does not make a right. Just because somebody did not start on equal footing with me does not mean that it's right to give the other an advantage to make up for the built-in disadvantage they started with. Yes it sucks, but taking from me for no reason but my race is wrong, even if I started out with an advantage due to "cultural biases" or anything else. I didn't do anything, and I'm playing by the rules, thus it's not just to treat me differently, good or bad. You don't get to "correct for those issues" after-the-fact by doing wrong things more, just to somebody else, usually who had nothing to do with the original acts.

Click to expand...

So if you start with an advantage you should keep it as long as you weren't directly responsible for that advantage?

See, the thing is that affirmative action is supposed to simply level the playing field... the fact that in real life it doesn't always do that, because there's no such thing as a perfect solution irl, isn't an argument against it's existence any more then the fact that some people are allergic to antibiotics is a reason not to use antibiotics.Identifying the people that are allergic and giving them an alternative treatment is the better solution imo.

I actually instituted an "at least one human" quota for my Pathfinder group because the gamers - friends of mine and tabletop RPG newbies - just went crazy with new races.

The current team composition: a gay half-elf rogue, a half-elf druid whose player decided his character's gender and name five minutes before the game, a tiefling sorceress and a human priestess of the sun goddess.

North_Ranger said:

I actually instituted an "at least one human" quota for my Pathfinder group because the gamers - friends of mine and tabletop RPG newbies - just went crazy with new races.

The current team composition: a gay half-elf rogue, a half-elf druid whose player decided his character's gender and name five minutes before the game, a tiefling sorceress and a human priestess of the sun goddess.

Click to expand...

Halforums: A forum where a topic about Obama's religion can lead to discussions about table top role-playing games. So pretty much the best forum in the world.

North_Ranger said:

I actually instituted an "at least one human" quota for my Pathfinder group because the gamers - friends of mine and tabletop RPG newbies - just went crazy with new races.

Click to expand...

I bet that human spent all his loot on mead and wenches instead of bettering himself.

@Li3n said:

I bet that human spent all his loot on mead and wenches instead of bettering himself.

Click to expand...

Nope. Heavy armor, shield and a +1 scimitar. It was the tiefling's player who wanted to buy a flute that summons rat swarms, even though I specifically told him we'd be pretty much stuck in the wilderness for a while. In the end he settled for a hat that makes the sorceress look like a regular person.

North_Ranger said:

Nope. Heavy armor, shield and a +1 scimitar. It was the tiefling's player who wanted to buy a flute that summons rat swarms, even though I specifically told him we'd be pretty much stuck in the wilderness for a while. In the end he settled for a hat that makes the sorceress look like a regular person.

Click to expand...

Answering the question kinda ruins the joke, you know.


But i have to ask, why are there no rats in the wilderness?

@Li3n said:

But i have to ask, why are there no rats in the wilderness?

Click to expand...

IRL, or in a game?

IRL I'd guess that rodent populations don't reach the insane levels that they can in Human cities because of their natural predators in the wild, which are bigger and potentially dangerous to humans, which are therefore kept down by people in cities, letting the rats go unchecked. But that's a guess, not authoritative in any way.

I meant in his game... we had enough rats up in the mountains to drown one each morning with no apparent effect on their population, and we where the only constant human food source for at least 2 miles, unless they can eat dried grass, like horses.

In cities they just have a more concentrated food source they swarm around, so they just seem more (unless you dont have homeless cats i guess, we have plenty).

Well, there was the fact that the magic item was called Pipes of the Sewers...

So no Sword of Frost outside the Arctic circle?

(did it's description say it required sewers or something?)

I believe the text said that it could summon rat swarms in their usual habitat - which I interpreted as being mostly in areas where rats are plentiful, such as major cities.

I believe my problem with that was that cities are hardly the only habitat they do well in... rodents where pretty well of before we invented cities you know.

Not in that world; far too many more dangerous foes than stray cats out there. Or, otherwise said, DM ruled it so

That aside, a one-human-minimum would apperciatively improve republican party meetings. I mean, don't they ever get bored of playing all those half-fiends, thieflings and half-orcs?

Well, if we're going to start equating fantasy races with RL politicians... let's see now...

Dennis Kucinich: gnome
Obama: high-CHA human
Romney: dwarf
Joe Biden: lich
Dick Cheney: pit fiend
Bill Clinton: halfling bard

I tend to say half-elf for Obama (high-CHA but wimpy ) and Chaos Dwarf or something for Romney...No way is he Lawful Good or Neutral

in other crackpot idiot news-

Donald Trump is supposed to be announcing his "October Surprise" today

Shush you, this is the DND nitpicking thread.

I don't want to create a new thread for Donald Trump

Charlie Don't Surf said:

I don't want to create a new thread for Donald Trump

Click to expand...

Well, all I've got to say is that surprise better be either that 1) Obama really really really is a muslim, or 2) Obama plays D&D.

GasBandit said:

Well, all I've got to say is that surprise better be either that 1) Obama really really really is a muslim, or 2) Obama plays D&D.

Click to expand...

The D&D part would likely make him unelectable.

GasBandit said:

2) Obama plays D&D.

Click to expand...

Honestly, that would not surprise me one bit.

The surprise was that Trump will pay $5m for Obama's passport and college transcripts/applications. So, nothing.

So... it's not so much as he has something as he has money he'll pay for something.

yeah. it's nothing.

Welp, time to send the Don a nice card.

Why can't he spend his money on something useful? Like, creating a waiting staff of solid gold robots or something?

@Li3n said:

I believe my problem with that was that cities are hardly the only habitat they do well in... rodents where pretty well of before we invented cities you know.

Click to expand...

Yeah, but wouldn't the high low lvl adventurer ratio also mean that sewer rats would be the most hunted animal in the world also?

Bubble181 said:

I tend to say half-elf for Obama (high-CHA but wimpy ) and Chaos Dwarf or something for Romney...No way is he Lawful Good or Neutral

Click to expand...

He's True Neutral... he takes all stances at once and none at all...

*sigh*

Goddammit, I was trying to avoid the hassle that comes with summoned monsters, particularly since this was a lvl 1 group. I checked just now, yes, rat swarms can be found in any environment, but I'm trying to give my players something more interesting to fight and encounter. And to avoid them trying to loot the corpses of goddamn rats!

Seriously, I had them roll Fortitude to see if they get filth fever from trying to find gold coins inside the diseased dire rats they just killed...

Hey, he got what he wanted. More cameras pointed at his face.

Espy said:

Hey, he got what he wanted. More cameras pointed at his face.

Click to expand...

No, one of them actually did catch filth fever.