Export thread

Despite last year's Supreme Court ruling that vehicle tracking constitutes a search, and thus requires a warrant, the Obama administration instructs agencies to continue to attach GPS tracking devices to the vehicles of US Citizens illegally.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/gps-warrant-requirement/

Details on last years ruling that forces such tracking to be considered search and seizure:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/scotus-gps-ruling/

They should just be lucky they're not getting blown up by drones.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

They should just be lucky they're not getting blown up by drones.

Click to expand...

Just think of the accuracy of a drone firing on a car with a GPS tracker Charlie.

Azurephoenix said:

Just think of the accuracy of a drone firing on a car with a GPS tracker Charlie.

Click to expand...

Military ones go down to sub-meter resolution, so I have little doubt law enforcement can get that accurate as well. So accurate enough.

I am for domestic drones as long as they are targeting road hogs driving under the speed limit in the fast lane...

I still can't believe the laissez faire attitude people have towards unwarranted search and seizure.

Bowielee said:

I still can't believe the laissez faire attitude people have towards unwarranted search and seizure.

Click to expand...

To some degree it's a "it doesn't affect me personally" problem.

They came for the terrorists, but I wasn't a terrorist. They came for the criminals but I wasn't a criminal. They came for the abusers and violent but I wasn't violent and didn't abuse. Then they came for the speeders.

%#^&

Bowielee said:

I still can't believe the laissez faire attitude people have towards unwarranted search and seizure.

Click to expand...

It's a pretty lethal combo of "fuck you, got mine" and white privilege at its best (worst).

Charlie Don't Surf said:

It's a pretty lethal combo of "fuck you, got mine" and white privilege at its best (worst).

Click to expand...

Are you feeling okay? You stretched so hard to blame white people on that one that you may have pulled a muscle.

Tress said:

Are you feeling okay? You stretched so hard to blame white people on that one that you may have pulled a muscle.

Click to expand...

Hey now, I godwin'd the thread a whole post before Charlie pulled in white privilege.

Are you treating me special because I'm white, or because I'm middle class and keeping the poor down?

You're being treated special because you have personally bred your very own small army, and we are afraid.

Tress said:

Are you feeling okay? You stretched so hard to blame white people on that one that you may have pulled a muscle.

Click to expand...

White people aren't harassed by the cops to the same degree colored people are. I didn't think this was news/a shocking revelation???

Just shut the fuck up. You're embarrassing yourself now, twit.

Tress said:

Just shut the fuck up. You're embarrassing yourself now, twit.

Click to expand...

Hold on a second, he does make a valid point there, in his dumbass charlie sort of way. Racial profiling is still a HUGE issue in this. I can bet you dollars to doughnuts that people who look middle eastern or have middle eastern names will still be the first to fall under these sorts of illegal searches and seizures. One of my college professors is from Iran and he's lived here for 30 years and he still gets profiled all over the place.

Okay, but here's why I'm annoyed. You commented on how amazed you are that more people don't care about this sort of thing. His response? "Yeah, it's people being selfish, and privileged white people."

So people of color are up in arms over this, are they? Huge outcry in Black, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, and Asian communities? Must be white people keeping it all quiet.

I don't doubt for a moment that non-white people get profiled much more. But he decided to mention that in response to a completely different point. Why, it's almost as if he was just sitting here, waiting in anticipation to blame white people for this! Of course Charlie, ever the rational and logical person, would never do that!

Bowielee said:

I still can't believe the laissez faire attitude people have towards unwarranted search and seizure.

Click to expand...

Uh... that's not what laissez faire means.

A laissez faire attitude would be as outraged as you are, as basically laissez faire can be summed up by the phrase "It's none of government's business to be involved."

GasBandit said:

Uh... that's not what laissez faire means.

A laissez faire attitude would be as outraged as you are, as basically laissez faire can be summed up by the phrase "It's none of government's business to be involved."

Click to expand...

You're right, I used it incorrectly.[DOUBLEPOST=1363818610][/DOUBLEPOST]

Tress said:

Okay, but here's why I'm annoyed. You commented on how amazed you are that more people don't care about this sort of thing. His response? "Yeah, it's people being selfish, and privileged white people."

So people of color are up in arms over this, are they? Huge outcry in Black, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, and Asian communities? Must be white people keeping it all quiet.

I don't doubt for a moment that non-white people get profiled much more. But he decided to mention that in response to a completely different point. Why, it's almost as if he was just sitting here, waiting in anticipation to blame white people for this! Of course Charlie, ever the rational and logical person, would never do that!

Click to expand...

Your response kind of makes it sound like you're dismissing the point. Yes, Charlie is a dumbass, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Bowielee said:

Yes, Charlie is a dumbass, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Click to expand...

Not if it's a digital clock.

Sparhawk said:

Not if it's a digital clock.

Click to expand...

And that's why I prefer the more folksy "even a blind pig finds a kernel of corn once in a while."

Sparhawk said:

Not if it's a digital clock.

Click to expand...

He's obviously analogue because he gets people so wound up... ZING!

Granted, my response was just a joke response, but seriously now... We're living among more and more people that don't really know how to tell time from an analogue clock. It's really rather disheartening.

Yeah, I'd wager most teenagers right now wouldn't actually know how to read an analogue clock.

analog clocks are stupid as fuck and why does it matter if anyone on earth knows how they work? I don't know how to use all kinds of ancient technology

Kids are still taught how to read an analog clock face.

stienman said:

Kids are still taught how to read an analog clock face.

Click to expand...

Much like diagramming sentences, they forget it almost instantly since they don't use it regularly. They learn to look at the phone to see the time now.

also mildly getting back on topic despite not wanting to bother anymore

Tress said:

Okay, but here's why I'm annoyed. You commented on how amazed you are that more people don't care about this sort of thing. His response? "Yeah, it's people being selfish, and privileged white people."

So people of color are up in arms over this, are they? Huge outcry in Black, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, and Asian communities? Must be white people keeping it all quiet.

I don't doubt for a moment that non-white people get profiled much more. But he decided to mention that in response to a completely different point. Why, it's almost as if he was just sitting here, waiting in anticipation to blame white people for this! Of course Charlie, ever the rational and logical person, would never do that!

Click to expand...

People only care about shit happening when it happens to them or someone they know. old white dudes have all the power and them and their friends have probably never been pulled over for driving while black or had their shit searched or had a gun pointed at them.

It's like that shithead senator who now gives a huge big fuck about gay rights since his son came out of the closet (see also: Cheney, Dick)

Charlie Don't Surf said:

analog clocks are stupid as fuck and why does it matter if anyone on earth knows how they work? I don't know how to use all kinds of ancient technology

Click to expand...

Insane Clown Posse said:

Fucking magnets, how do they work?

Click to expand...

Scientists be lyin and gettin charlie pissed.

Remember how people were up in arms when Bush was around and the Patriot Act was first implemented? Why isn't that happening now?

stienman said:

Kids are still taught how to read an analog clock face.

Click to expand...

It's a good way to reinforce counting by 5's. It also demonstrates what a quarter of an hour is and gives you a better idea of "where" you are in an hour.

/elementary school teacher

bhamv3 said:

Remember how people were up in arms when Bush was around and the Patriot Act was first implemented? Why isn't that happening now?

Click to expand...

I think people are worn down and tired. We still hate it, we've just exhausted ourselves protesting.

Also, white people.

bhamv3 said:

Remember how people were up in arms when Bush was around and the Patriot Act was first implemented? Why isn't that happening now?

Click to expand...

That's not how I remember it. I recall people just rolling over the second anyone mentioned the "war on terror".

And anyone who dissented was labelled unamerican

^Thats what I remember too. People hadn't yet gotten over the flag-waving phase. Some people I knew didn't like it, but not many spoke up.

I was literally afraid to talk about politics back then for fear of actual physical retaliation.

Bowielee said:

That's not how I remember it. I recall people just rolling over the second anyone mentioned the "war on terror".

And anyone who dissented was labelled unamerican

Click to expand...

Oh, huh, maybe not when it was first implemented then. There was definitely opposition afterwards though, maybe around the time approaching the election. Just found it odd how America seems to be ok with giving Obama a lot more leeway for very similar actions. Or am I mistaken?

Charlie Don't Surf said:

also mildly getting back on topic despite not wanting to bother anymore

People only care about shit happening when it happens to them or someone they know. old white dudes have all the power and them and their friends have probably never been pulled over for driving while black or had their shit searched or had a gun pointed at them.

It's like that shithead senator who now gives a huge big fuck about gay rights since his son came out of the closet (see also: Cheney, Dick)

Click to expand...

I don't understand this dismissive attitude. I'm really glad that Sen Portman now backs gay rights. Shouldn't this kind of change of heart be something we rejoice over? Yes, he 'only' cares because it happened to someone he knows, but that's still a positive change. He didn't dismiss his son, or criticise him. He not only welcomed his son's sexual orientation, he embraced the whole gay community by announcing he supported them.

I'd love everyone to put themselves in the shoes of others without having to literally know someone or personally suffer the indignities that others have gone through. That'd be awesome, it would make the world a better place. But I am still happy when other reasons for a positive change come about and give us hope.

I guess I am just confused. You want people to stop being patriarchal and an old boys club, but when one of them has a change of heart, you call him a shithead. What can he do to redeem himself? Go back in time and change his original stance on gay rights? Sadly not an option. But he can work now and in the future to make things better, so let's welcome that change.

I'm happy for his vote, sure, but the logic is still spurious at best

I'd feel the same way if someone became a hawk after their son died in a terrorist attack (see: everyone voting for the Patriot Act in 2001)

I can sympathize with people who start to understand the importance of an issue after giving it a "face." I've been there. It's not ideal, but it's one way to arrive at a good decision. This is purely anecdotal, but I feel that I became more open to considering different points of view after realizing that an issue I'd ignored affected someone I loved. Hopefully it can be that way for others too.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

I'm happy for his vote, sure, but the logic is still spurious at best

I'd feel the same way if someone became a hawk after their son died in a terrorist attack (see: everyone voting for the Patriot Act in 2001)

Click to expand...

While I agree the logic is spurious, I suppose I am more hopeful it will result in future deeper considerations by Portman on other issues as well as gay rights. Maybe he'll ask himself, "But if it were me, or my family...". Which, itself, isn't always the right question but might lead to better ones. Maybe I am too optimistic.

I feel like calling him a shithead does no one favours though. I feel like you're ever willing to point all that's wrong -and believe me, there's a lot wrong and people need to point it out- but you rarely acknowledge or celebrate the right things, the just things, the happy good things. Obviously I only see you through the filter of Halforums and maybe you're a lot less cynical one-on-one, but, I mean, celebrate this shithead's change of heart! Even if just in a small way it shows people can change The dreams of a better future are well and alive as long as we know people can come to new conclusions.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

I'm happy for his vote, sure, but the logic is still spurious at best

I'd feel the same way if someone became a hawk after their son died in a terrorist attack (see: everyone voting for the Patriot Act in 2001)

Click to expand...

It's times like this that I realize exactly how armchair your views on everything are. The absolute BEST way to help people understand that those of different classes/races/sexualities, etc... is to get to know one. It humanizes them, which goes a loooooong way to changing their point of view and starting to view these people as part of the same in group.

And that's not just me saying that, it's decades of social psychology research and experimentation.

I agree that it's effective. I just have a hard time standing and applauding someone for realizing that homosexuals are human beings

Charlie Don't Surf said:

I agree that it's effective. I just have a hard time standing and applauding someone for realizing that homosexuals are human beings

Click to expand...

I'm not even rising to your bait anymore. You truly are the thickest person if you're not trolling. You also are talking completely out of your ass.

http://www.amazon.com/Social-Psychology-Plus-MyPsychLab-eText/dp/020591201X

do yourself a favor.

Bowielee said:

...magnets, how do they work?

Click to expand...

I WILL NEVER REVEAL THE SECRET OF MAGNETISM.

Bowielee said:

I'm not even rising to your bait anymore. You truly are the thickest person if you're not trolling. You also are talking completely out of your ass.

http://www.amazon.com/Social-Psychology-Plus-MyPsychLab-eText/dp/020591201X

do yourself a favor.

Click to expand...

Keep in mind that Charlie has said that he doesn't believe people can change except, perhaps, on the surface. I recall a very long and frustrating argument with him on it, and as far as I can tell he believes that any deep change someone experiences is actually their own subconscious belief coming to the surface. Similarly, if someone has believed one thing stoutly for a very long time, it's much more likely that they are only paying lip service to a change of heart rather than actually having had a real change of heart.

I suspect it's also the reason he keeps going on and on about the ills of our society, culture, and educational system. If one believes that people can't really change past childhood, then the only solution to any and every problem is not reform or punishment of the perpetrator, it's changing society so the person never holds the bad belief in the first place.

But chances are I've got it all wrong, and even if I have some of it right in broad strokes I'm sure there's a lot more nuance to his actual beliefs, compared to my assumptions.

Still, it does explain why he wouldn't care for someone who only recently appears to be supporting gay rights.

Bowielee said:

I'm not even rising to your bait anymore. You truly are the thickest person if you're not trolling. You also are talking completely out of your ass.

http://www.amazon.com/Social-Psychology-Plus-MyPsychLab-eText/dp/020591201X

do yourself a favor.

Click to expand...

EVERYTHING he posts is a troll. He's said as much. He never came here with anything but ill intent. Crone saw to that.

Hell, even his pics scream "please punch me in the face. Repeatedly."

A) If you're not OK with a change of heart because of personal experience, are you also willing to throw out Saint Paul and, with him, half of the New Testament? Saul was a prosecutor becfore he became a Christian.

B) If you're not OK with a change of heart because of personal experience, what else is there? ALL of our opinions are formed by what we've experienced, or what we've been told, or because of our own, original thought process. Let's be serious and admit that about 90% of the people don't, don't want, and never will, think seriously about ethical issues themselves. Even smart, intelligent people tend to spend most of their time trying to sort out other people's ideas and making their own mind up about those other opinions or points, not actually forming new original thoughts. It's hard, and most good ones have been had already. So....if people hold a specific belief because they've been told it's the right thing in childhood, it's OK, but if they are taught A and later realize B is right, that's not valid? that's the opposite of logical. There's a reason poachers make the best groundskeepers and converts are the most zealous.

C) "Laissez-faire" means "to let them do what they want"; this wasn't a wrong usage. If I allow the government to search and whatever anyone they want, and I just look on and do nothing, that's the very definition of laissez-faire. Laissez-faire, laissez-passer is another, similar attitude, for which this would be wrong.

D) Bhamv, I think during Bush we, non-americans, saw a lot of younger/more modern USA complain and moan about such measures on the internet, while we didn't see much of the ones not complaining. It's modern, young and left America that's now being much less vocal in their opposition because Obama is "their" candidate, or at least "the lesser of two evils".

Charlie Don't Surf said:

I agree that it's effective. I just have a hard time standing and applauding someone for realizing that homosexuals are human beings

Click to expand...

I definitely see this differently than applauding someone for acknowledging the humanity of others. I don't know what conversation stienman is referring to but I am of the belief people can have meaningful philosophical changes and it is that aspect that bolsters my spirit here.

DarkAudit said:

EVERYTHING he posts is a troll. He's said as much. He never came here with anything but ill intent. Crone saw to that.

Hell, even his pics scream "please punch me in the face. Repeatedly."

Click to expand...

I remember his saying that he communicates with snark a lot, but that's not the same as saying everything he says is a troll. I don't get why people feel personally riled by his posts; he sure does get results though. But, my family and friends are sarcastic, sharp, smug people and maybe I'm just used to it.

Also I don't know I've ever seen a photo of Charlie Don't Surf.

Considering IIRC Charlie said he used to be a libertarian racist*, I think its pretty hypocritical of him to say no one can change.

*Sorry if this isn't true at all.

Bubble181 said:

A) If you're not OK with a change of heart because of personal experience, are you also willing to throw out Saint Paul and, with him, half of the New Testament? Saul was a prosecutor becfore he became a Christian.

Click to expand...

Persecutor.

Also see: The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James, which everyone should read. Oddly enforced my atheism despite its subjects and conclusions. Fascinating studies of more contemporary people who underwent massive changes to their core.

Sorry, I know I get prosecutor and persecutor mixed up, and when I think about it I know which is which, but....Eh, 5 am posting Point stands though

And it's not at all strange to find atheism or agnosticism reinforced by religious books; on the contrary. It can help you find a better understanding of why people believe and you don't; it can help make you realize that what you feel isn't "real" faith and you're just going along for appearances as well. It's never a bad idea to inform yourself from different sides of a conversation/discussion/topic, as long as all sides make sense.

Bubble181 said:

Sorry, I know I get prosecutor and persecutor mixed up, and when I think about it I know which is which, but....Eh, 5 am posting Point stands though

And it's not at all strange to find atheism or agnosticism reinforced by religious books; on the contrary. It can help you find a better understanding of why people believe and you don't; it can help make you realize that what you feel isn't "real" faith and you're just going along for appearances as well. It's never a bad idea to inform yourself from different sides of a conversation/discussion/topic, as long as all sides make sense.

Click to expand...

Oh, certainly. I meant more from it's resoundingly optimistic tone and glowing joy in describing the various ways in which people experience 'religion' (although not in the strict sense of hierarchical organisations). The fact that it reinforced my atheism isn't odd, actually, I meant more (though I phrased it ambiguously) that it reinforced my atheism in an odd manner.

I guess this isn't really on topic at all.

Anyway I was just teasing about the persecutor/prosecutor thing. I am pretty sure everyone knew what you meant

blotsfan said:

Considering IIRC Charlie said he used to be a libertarian racist*, I think its pretty hypocritical of him to say no one can change.

*Sorry if this isn't true at all.

Click to expand...

Read his posts. Fair to say some of them are pretty damn racist.

Chad Sexington said:

I definitely see this differently than applauding someone for acknowledging the humanity of others. I don't know what conversation stienman is referring to but I am of the belief people can have meaningful philosophical changes and it is that aspect that bolsters my spirit here.


I remember his saying that he communicates with snark a lot, but that's not the same as saying everything he says is a troll. I don't get why people feel personally riled by his posts; he sure does get results though. But, my family and friends are sarcastic, sharp, smug people and maybe I'm just used to it.

Also I don't know I've ever seen a photo of Charlie Don't Surf.

Click to expand...

He posted one a while back when he was trying to bring the Hitler stash back into fashion.

DarkAudit said:

Read his posts. Fair to say some of them are pretty damn racist.

Click to expand...

citation needed

I don't post many pictures since I have a thin skin about my appearance and am slightly worried someone would say something mean or just joking and I'd take it badly and feel bad. I was at a wedding this past weekend with like 3 really good photographer type friends that probably took flattering pictures + I was dressed up in person clothes

Charlie Don't Surf said:

citation needed

Click to expand...

I'm away from the PC so I don't have a direct link, but your reply in the jury duty thread to knowing a suspect was guilty was "because he was black?" when it never came up in the post.

TBH, it's mostly you accusing the rest of us of racism, sexism, bigotry, misogyny, and what have you.

Which is just as bad.

DarkAudit said:

I'm away from the PC so I don't have a direct link, but your reply in the jury duty thread to knowing a suspect was guilty was "because he was black?" when it never came up in the post.

TBH, it's mostly you accusing the rest of us of racism, sexism, bigotry, misogyny, and what have you.

Which is just as bad.

Click to expand...

that was a flippant joke, but you got me there, I'm the true racist.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

citation needed

I don't post many pictures since I have a thin skin about my appearance and am slightly worried someone would say something mean or just joking and I'd take it badly and feel bad. I was at a wedding this past weekend with like 3 really good photographer type friends that probably took flattering pictures + I was dressed up in person clothes

Click to expand...

Hopefully the pictures came out good enough for you to post one, but there are lots here who don't post pictures so don't feel bad about not doing it. I've found that as much as some disagree with me on some very personal things, no one has every posted something unkind about any personal images I've posted, not even the "Vagina: not a clown car" meme, which says a lot about the community. But you do engender significant ire in some people that is different than the irritation that I given them, so perhaps you would be treated differently. I hope not, but humans are funny and unpredictable creatures.

Also, if you are rocking a toothbrush mustache as The_Khan asserts, that would be hilarious. Add a bowler hat and be Charlie Don't Chaplin for a month.

I believe that pic was a goofy one off I took while I was in the middle of shaving a full-ish beard and I never left the house with it, but I don't remember for sure.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

analog clocks are stupid as fuck and why does it matter if anyone on earth knows how they work? I don't know how to use all kinds of ancient technology

Click to expand...

My wind up pocket watch will still run long after your battery drips in a landfill.

Krisken said:

My wind up pocket watch will still run long after your battery drips in a landfill.

Click to expand...

if we're going that way, SUNDIAL

Krisken said:

My wind up pocket watch will still run long after your battery drips in a landfill.

Click to expand...

As long as you keep winding it and maintain it. My Casio W71 requires a new battery once every decade or so.

If you aren't getting your windup serviced every decade it's going to bind up on you.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

if we're going that way, SUNDIAL

Click to expand...

I just remembered we used to have a sundial in my backyard growing up. I spent a great deal of time figuring out how it worked. I think I've forgotten how to read them now, though.

I'm gonna buy a sundial.

Charlie Don't Surf said:

if we're going that way, SUNDIAL

Click to expand...

which is analog.

stienman said:

As long as you keep winding it and maintain it. My Casio W71 requires a new battery once every decade or so.

If you aren't getting your windup serviced every decade it's going to bind up on you.

Click to expand...

Do you know how to make a battery for your watch? I know how to maintain my watch.

Krisken said:

Do you know how to make a battery for your watch? I know how to maintain my watch.

Click to expand...

Covar said:

which is analog.

Click to expand...

Or digital, the sun is "on" or "off"

Krisken said:

Do you know how to make a battery for your watch? I know how to maintain my watch.

Click to expand...

Yes, but that's hardly common knowledge, now is it?

stienman said:

Yes, but that's hardly common knowledge, now is it?

Click to expand...

Exactly.

Krisken said:

Exactly.

Click to expand...

I think he meant mechanical watch maintenance.

GasBandit said:

I think he meant mechanical watch maintenance.

Click to expand...

I meant both, but left it ambiguous to see which one people would pick.

I suspect most people won't have a clue how to power their digital watch via homemade batteries, nor would they know what to do if they opened up the back of their fully mechanical pocket watch. You can't just use any old oil, and if you use too much or get it in the wrong places you'll be left with a nonfunctional timepiece.

But I'm splitting hairs here. If we get to the point where I cannot buy a battery for my watch, knowing the date and time is hardly going to be my highest priority, and no doubt I'll learn how to use older techniques and methods quickly enough for the times I do need to understand date and time.

As someone who proudly owns ridiculous watches, I do occasionally rely on my phone for the time. And by "rely on my phone", I mean use it to look up lewd pictures while laying outside in the nude. Sundials FTW, beeyotches!

Fun Size said:

nude...Sundials

Click to expand...

Wait... That would actually work... And the lewd images would be a necessary part of the process...

Hey Hylian, I know what kind of tattoo you need to get, and where!