I would say that's an overly-simplistic view of what most "settlement" is. The vast majority of the time (from what I can tell) it is setting up dwellings anywhere that is beyond that 1967 line, and most (all?) of the time that's new buildings, and most of the time on things that may have been classed as farmland (though if you look at before images, often nothing's been growing for... ever?). So while I can appreciate the idea that people say they're losing their land (which is true), it's not the same as purging a town and setting up shop in the same place, which it often is portrayed as.However, I also see the Palestinians have their own land, and regardless about whose land it should be, it is for all intents and purposes, theirs. As long as Israel supports people going into Palestinian villages, kicks people out of their homes, and moves in, Israel can not claim it is acting in good faith with regards to a peaceful resolution.
Where is that the way it's often portrait?it's not the same as purging a town and setting up shop in the same place, which it often is portrayed as.
Well, in this very thread...Where is that the way it's often portrait?
As long as Israel supports people going into Palestinian villages, kicks people out of their homes, and moves in, Israel can not claim it is acting in good faith with regards to a peaceful resolution.
Well, in this very thread...
Ah yes, if Israel wasn't there the middle easterners would just all invade the west... maybe in boats or something.Israel is our one true ally and our first bulwark against the spread of the archaic barbarism endemic to the middle east, and should be afforded every measure of support we can give.
Well i'm glad you agree that if the population of a place has horrible ideas it's ok for someone else to take their land... i assume y'all will surrender peacefully to Canada on the 20th, right.I've said this before - I'm of the opinion that Palestine ceased to exist as a legitimate sovereign body when Arafat walked away from the Camp David accords despite being given everything he asked for in the agreement save the one condition that it be acknowledged that Israel has the right to exist - a position furthered by their embracing of Hamas as their governing body.
Well your opinions did soften a lot over the years, but i didn't expect you to actually advocate multiculturalism so fervently.It's long past time for the so-called "Palestinians" to either assimilate into Israeli society (as many have)
The issue with that is that if every single Palestinian said "this isn't our land. We're Israeli citizens now" the right wing of the country (Bibi's party) would not be ok with that since Jews would be a minority. Its the issue of having a country that was founded for one specific religious group, but also allows religious freedom.It's long past time for the so-called "Palestinians" to either assimilate into Israeli society
The problem there is the possibility of "Palestinians" outnumbering Isreali Jews. And Isreal does NOT want its Jewish population to be outnumbered by Arabs in their own country.It's long past time for the so-called "Palestinians" to either assimilate into Israeli society
You haven't paid attention at all to Europe over the last 10 or so years, have you.Ah yes, if Israel wasn't there the middle easterners would just all invade the west... maybe in boats or something.
Dude, really?You haven't paid attention at all to Europe over the last 10 or so years, have you.
I call dibs on Hawaii!Well i'm glad you agree that if the population of a place has horrible ideas it's ok for someone else to take their land... i assume y'all will surrender peacefully to Canada on the 20th, right.
Basically, anytime you say to another state "you're a state, but we're your police force" they're not their own state. I understand why somebody in Israel may see that as essential, but that's just not a thing.Doesn't he remember how "well" (not well at all) the occupation of southern Lebanon went for decades? It was better after they left.Israel will negotiate with Palestine their borders, which will be open. Israeli security will be from the river to the sea. Palestine will not bear arms. These are non-negotiable conditions. Bush and Obama accepted them as such. Even if they did not do so, as a sovereign state, we demand these security precautions. Without them, there will be no Palestine.
Not given quite everything they asked for, but like 90% of everything they asked for. The Palestinians saw the generous Israeli offer as a sign of weakness, and thought they could get more. A negotiating tactic, and one that ultimately failed with the coming into power of Sharon's administration in Israel, which was initially much less inclined to make such concessions.I've said this before - I'm of the opinion that Palestine ceased to exist as a legitimate sovereign body when Arafat walked away from the Camp David accords despite being given everything he asked for in the agreement save the one condition that it be acknowledged that Israel has the right to exist
I believe my previous post was meant to imply that they don't really need to give a shit about what the Palestinians really want. It's not like any of the other Arab states around them wouldn't jump at the chance to make Israel not be a country anymore.Last thing before bed, from Canada of all places: Why would anyone ever think the Palestinians would accept a two-state solution?
His text describes in more detail what Gas referred to above about them getting everything they (say they) want in 2000, and refusing.
In either case, the Island School of Building Arts policy likely violated Canadian law. Under the B.C. Human Rights Code, for one, businesses are prohibited from discriminating based on “place of origin.”
The difference in position between 'advocating for Israel's destruction' and 'still rejected the country's right to exist and backs "armed struggle" against it' seems pretty damned minute, especially given the ambiguity:Reuters said:The Palestinian Islamist group Hamas on Monday dropped its longstanding call for Israel's destruction, but said it still rejected the country's right to exist and backs "armed struggle" against it.
In a policy document presented in Doha by its leader Khaled Meshaal, Hamas also said it would end its association with the Muslim Brotherhood, a move apparently aimed at improving ties with Gulf Arab states and Egypt, which view the Brotherhood as a terrorist group.
So same old, same old. LOOK like you're doing something, but actually business as usual.Reuters said:It remained unclear whether the document replaces Hamas's 1988 charter, which calls for Israel’s destruction
There's more in the Wikipedia article than that of course, but that's the shortest part that still makes sense quoted.Families of terrorists killed by Israeli security forces while they are murdering Israelis are paid stipends of about $800 to $1,000 per month. The families of convicted terrorists serving time in Israeli prisons receive $3,000 or higher per month.[16][12] According to Yossi Kuperwasser of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, in 2017 the Palestinian Authority was paying out $300 million annually in terrorism stipends, which tallies to about 7 percent of the Authority's annual budget, and to more than 20% of the total foreign aid donations given to the Authority by all governments.[16]
...
In June, 2017, Palestinian Authority President Mahmood Abbas called efforts to stop the martyr payments an "aggression against the Palestinian people," and defended the salaries paid to to imprisoned Palestinians as a "social responsibility."[22]
Wow. The Palestinians are really stingy. We pay our terrorists millions.He basically says "when the Palestinian Authority stops paying $3000USD per month to the families of those who are terrorists, that will help a lot."
Full audio: Full Audio of Jared Kushner's Remarks to Congressional InternsAnd again, all these people make arguments about why they feel the way they do. So as tensions were really mounting, I don't know if everyone is familiar, but there were two people—two Israeli guards killed at the Temple Mount (and that's the first time in many, many, many years that that happened, so Israelis [unintelligible] putting up metal detectors on the Temple Mount, which is not an irrational thing to do. You know when you have—police officers were just killed, and weapons that were used to [unintelligible] the weapons to check them—so then what happens is they start inciting it.
They say look, you know, this is a change to the status quo. The Temple Mount is a [unintelligible] occupation of Israel, and Israel was saying we don’t want anything to do with that, we just want to make sure people are safe. And that really incited a lot of tension in the streets.
So we're going to work with them [unintelligible] to take down the metal detectors there, and then I think one of the Palestinians' religious leaders was saying, “If you go through the metal detectors, then your prayers don’t count.” And that is not a very helpful thing to have said. And then there was a lot of rage. And there was an Israeli family that three people killed in their home, which was absolutely terrible. You know, so, "I'm going to do this to free the Temple Mount." So ultimately we were able to work with them, and we were able to get the Israelis to take down to the different forms of surveillance that the Jordanians were OK with, and we talked with the Palestinians the whole time to try to get their viewpoint on it.
And then ultimately they said, "OK, we took down the metal detectors but there's still a bridge up somewhere." And they said, "OK, we'll take that down, too." And so Bibi was getting beaten up by the press in Israel, because that was very politically unpopular for him to do. At the same time we got a situation in Jordan where an Israeli security diplomat in Jordan was attacked by two Jordanian men, and in self-defense he killed the attackers. So then it worked out where the Jordanians got the Israelis to accept their people from the embassy back to Israel
Incredibly bold.Trump phones Arab leaders to announce U.S. Embassy moving to Jerusalem
And that'll be a thing.
I'm gonna guess that they edited the article since you read it last, because, from the article:Canada among 35 abstaining from UN vote condemning American embassy move to Jerusalem
I haven't found an easy list of the countries that abstained yet.
[DOUBLEPOST=1513880419,1513880244][/DOUBLEPOST]Also, NayThe full list of abstaining countries was: Antigua-Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, the Bahamas, Benin, Bhutan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cameroon, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Dominican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Fiji, Haiti, Hungary, Jamaica, Kiribati, Latvia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, the Solomon Islands, South Sudan, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, Uganda and Vanuatu.
And YayThe countries that voted with the United States against the resolution condemning its embassy move were Togo, Palau, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Honduras, Guatemala and Israel.
The United Kingdom, France, Germany, Ireland, Belgium, Portugal, Spain and China all voted to condemn the move of the American embassy as part of a total of 128 countries voting in favour of the resolution.
Same as everyone else's reason. We'll come for their oil (even if it IS loaded with sulphur).I'm curious about their reasons for not wanting to piss off America
Well sure, but that hasn't stopped Argentina from trying to piss you off every other day. There's got to be something special going on, it seems to me.Same as everyone else's reason. We'll come for their oil (even if it IS loaded with sulphur).
--Patrick
That doesn't explain many of them. Uganda for instance.Same as everyone else's reason. We'll come for their oil (even if it IS loaded with sulphur).
They're concerned about Trump's supporters pining for the good old days.That doesn't explain many of them. Uganda for instance.
Yeah after widespread discrimination and voter intimidation.Well, they were elected so...
You sure got me, the ultimate defender of America.Good thing that could never happen here.
This is the official stance of the Israeli government.There is literally no acceptable end to this conflict according to Palestine's "neighbors" (and never has been) other than the complete annihilation of Palestine and the eradication of the Palestinian people. That's been made abundantly clear numerous times.
Except that's clearly false. As I said... Arafat walked away from a treaty that gave Palestine a state because it would remove their cassus belli against Israel. That was basically the moment when Palestine stopped existing as anything other than a rallying mcguffin for terrorists.This is the official stance of the Israeli government.
Assimilate. Into Israel (it's been done, a lot), or Jordan, or Egypt, or Lebanon (maybe not Syria). And it's time for the UN to tell those neighboring countries to stop exacerbating the situation by keeping Palestinians in refugee camps on the border instead of taking them in.So because of what happened 20 years ago by someone that has been dead for 15 years, genocide is ok?
Bibi and his party have been working to effectively strip Israeli arabs of their citizenship.Assimilate. Into Israel (it's been done, a lot), or Jordan, or Egypt, or Lebanon (maybe not Syria). And it's time for the UN to tell those neighboring countries to stop exacerbating the situation by keeping Palestinians in refugee camps on the border instead of taking them in.
What did they ever do for us?Fucking Romans!
You're off by a few thousands of years, bucko.So because of what happened 20 years ago by someone that has been dead for 15 years, genocide is ok?
So that justifies the genocide the Bibi is trying to implement? I'm sorry, I'm not sure how this works.You're off by a few thousands of years, bucko.
EDIT: You'll notice I said thousands, there, Blotsboy.
So the problem with the Holocaust was that the Jewish leadership didn't actually plan to take over the world?Slight difference in that the Nazis had to convince everyday Germans that they were under attack. Israel has literally been under attack since its founding to this day. There is literally no acceptable end to this conflict according to Israel's "neighbors" (and never has been) other than the complete annihilation of Israel and the eradication of the Jewish people. That's been made abundantly clear numerous times.
As i said before, Israel can just let them be a separate state and not give a fuck about them not recognizing anything, since it's not like giving them independence will actually threaten Israel (see: Six-Day War).Remember when Clinton arranged for Israel to give Palestine literally everything on its wish list, including a Palestinian state, and Arafat walked away from the table because the deal's only request of him was to admit that Israel had a right to exist?
Yeah, but Israel's arguably been a dick to everybody around 'm since arguably 1968.Israel is like that friend of yours that's been in your life for a long time and one day you look at him & go, "Why do I like this guy? He's an asshole." Yet you have to keep pretending you're friends because he has all the dirt on you and let's you crash at his place in a bad neighborhood.
Everything Trump touches turns to comedy.I don't know why you people are marking it funny.
I keep wanting to understand the conflict, but it's literally thousands of years old and I...just don't understand it at all. I keep trying to find maybe videos that explain it, but they get so complicated so quickly, throwing around leaders and other names so fast that I get overwhelmed.
It's colonialism. Bunch of Europeans going to a place and claiming it despite there already being people there. Then they proceed to brutalize and ethnically cleanse the people there. Oh and it's also an ethnostate.I keep wanting to understand the conflict, but it's literally thousands of years old and I...just don't understand it at all. I keep trying to find maybe videos that explain it, but they get so complicated so quickly, throwing around leaders and other names so fast that I get overwhelmed.
You're aware that calling the Israelites Europeans is... Very questionable, right? They may have partially been scattered across Europe, they must definitely never considered themselves European. And due to some very effective ethnic cleansing about 75 years ago, most modern day Jews have at minimum mixed roots.It's colonialism. Bunch of Europeans going to a place and claiming it despite there already being people there. Then they proceed to brutalize and ethnically cleanse the people there. Oh and it's also an ethnostate.
They've been in Europe for almost 2 millennia. That's longer the some other Europeans, like the Hungarians. So they're at the very least European Jews. Just like there are North African Jews.You're aware that calling the Israelites Europeans is... Very questionable, right? They may have partially been scattered across Europe, they must definitely never considered themselves European.
Wait, are we still pretending they didn't fuck up the Middle East on purpose?It's still European colonialism in the sense that France and England just decided to create a state and stuff people there with no thought to the ones already there.
Yeah, that's true.Lastly, claiming colonialism can only come from Europeans is also way off.
You know, normally I'd agree with this, but I remember an incident back when I worked at Lehman: one of my jobs was setting up the international video conferencing. The call was with an office in Israel, and to set up the calls on our system, you had to search by region. I searched everywhere I thought it could be, and finally had to call the admin to contacted me to tell her I wasn't able to find it preprogrammed in our system. The admin, who was Israeli-born, got very huffy with me and said it was listed in Europe (which it was). When I said that it was odd, why was it under Europe?, she got border-line pissed off and said that Israel is European. ....at that point, I REALLY didn't want to pursue that conversation any longer, so I shut my mouth and finished the reservation.You're aware that calling the Israelites Europeans is... Very questionable, right? They may have partially been scattered across Europe, they must definitely never considered themselves European.
My god.
They were born in Europe, their parents were born in Europe and they carried with them European citizenship. The fact that Europeans were anti-semetic monsters doesn't make them not European.You're aware that calling the Israelites Europeans is... Very questionable, right? They may have partially been scattered across Europe, they must definitely never considered themselves European. And due to some very effective ethnic cleansing about 75 years ago, most modern day Jews have at minimum mixed roots.
Yeah yeah defend European colonialism. World would be much better if Europeans had just stayed where they were.It's still European colonialism in the sense that France and England just decided to create a state and stuff people there with no thought to the ones already there.
Lastly, claiming colonialism can only come from Europeans is also way off.
For all international sports, Israel is considered Europe because the middle eastern countries won't play them.You know, normally I'd agree with this, but I remember an incident back when I worked at Lehman: one of my jobs was setting up the international video conferencing. The call was with an office in Israel, and to set up the calls on our system, you had to search by region. I searched everywhere I thought it could be, and finally had to call the admin to contacted me to tell her I wasn't able to find it preprogrammed in our system. The admin, who was Israeli-born, got very huffy with me and said it listed was in Europe (which it was). When I said that it was odd, why was it under Europe?, she got border-line pissed off and said that Israel is European. ....at that point, I REALLY didn't want to pursue that conversation any longer, so I shut my mouth and finished the reservation.
(Also, I feel like I my have mentioned this story before, but it bares repeating that for some people the line of European/not European isn't as cut-and-dry as we might think.)
But the roads were Hamas headquarters.They didn't target the big hospital in Gaza luckily, only all the surrounding roads and buildings, making it useless.
Honestly I feel like Israel has been turning into a pretty intense ethnostate more then anything, which considering the origins of the modern state of Israel, feels terribly ironic in the worst way possible.I'm leaning more and more towards the "fuck Israel" side of things. Note that this this has nothing to do with their religion. Their government is just acting evil.
That doesn't seem as cut-and-dried to me as you seem to think it is. It is possible this was vindictive, yes, but it is so one-sided I can't even tell.Just in case you weren't sure where the power in this situation lies.
The AP fired a reporter (who is Jewish) days after the Israeli government bombed a building housing their offices into rubble, because she was critical of Israel's government in college.
More Jews live in New York than live in Israel.This brings up the thing that annoys me the most about all the conversations on this, and that's the fact Israel isn't Judaism. Israelis are Jewish, yes, but they are not Judaism itself, anymore then say Iran is Islam or the United States is Christian.
It really burns my craw every time we equate the bad shit a nation does and then latch onto the religion aspects because it brings the wrong narrative. People in the US are not angry at Israel because they are Jewish, you can't call someone critical of Israel an anti-Semite just like you can't call a person critical of Iran an Islamophobe. I saw people screaming at Jewish people supporting Palestine as "traitors" and it just pisses me off.
I am super critical of religion as a whole these days, and I feel that a lot of our biggest disagreements would go away if religion as a concept just vanished overnight, but as long as we have to deal with it we should at least focus on the fact these are nations doing shit that also happen to follow a religion, not a religion in itself.
It seemed like she was employed at the AP building that was bombed the way that everyone was talking about her. Nor did anything say which thing she once said went over the line. The naked mole rat line? Maybe. *shrug* It is speculation since they are being tight-lipped about it.Here's her interview if you want her side.
'I was just canceled': An interview with Emily Wilder
Wilder was fired from the AP and told she violated their social media policy.www.sfgate.com
That is the way it works when they refuse to talk about it. Though if they had a reason for the firing that's better then she made posts in college thry probably would have said it instead of just letting this reasoning continue.It seemed like she was employed at the AP building that was bombed the way that everyone was talking about her. Nor did anything say which thing she once said went over the line. The naked mole rat line? Maybe. *shrug* It is speculation since they are being tight-lipped about it.
Sounds like everyone in the organization is chickenshit. Editors and coworkers alike.It does sound like her editor couldn't protect her from higher-ups that didn't want to face conservative criticisms, though. That does seem very cowardly to me, on the part of those higher-ups.
He looks more like one of the obstreperous nitwits Mal picked a fight with in episode 1.Dude thinks he'd be a brown coat but he'd most definitely be working for the Alliance.
It's probably something along the lines of why my stepmother (who is black) does not enjoy Firefly - because a very good argument could be made that the browncoats are a thinly veiled lionization of the post-reconstruction confederacy,Pray tell, show your math on this equation.
Cowboys who lost the war and don't trust the government they were once fighting against? Yeah, I an see it.It's probably something along the lines of why my stepmother (who is black) does not enjoy Firefly - because a very good argument could be made that the browncoats are a thinly veiled lionization of the post-reconstruction confederacy,
And if you're a person who has it in their head that the civil war was "the war of northern aggression" it's even more "apparent."Cowboys who lost the war and don't trust the government they were once fighting against? Yeah, I an see it.
Sentence fragment. Consider revising.Folks that haven't read any dystopian future SF where Corporations control every aspect of your life where you are a 'corporate drone or the trash outside the corporate structure'
You/ve got fine taste in podcasts my man.Just finished part two. Holy shit. I knew it was bad, but it’s amazing how much of what they’re doing is able to be completely ignored by the media.
Look, refusing service is all well and good if it's because the other is gay or trans or...urban (wink wink nudge nudge youknowwhatimean) or something. Merely being part of an evil invasion force pushing innocent civilians off their own lands, stealing houses and property, breaking a dozen international treaties is no reason at all.Of all the laws that are blatantly unconstitutional, anti BDS ones are maybe the most blatant. “You HAVE to do buisness with this country no matter what.”
I agree, although government contracts with the States in question may be a different matter.Of all the laws that are blatantly unconstitutional, anti BDS ones are maybe the most blatant. “You HAVE to do buisness with this country no matter what.”
This is the guy that wants to replace Trump and not waste the opportunity like Trump did.In a shock to no one, here comes Desantis.
That's a lot.]DeSantis] also said that if the companies don’t “cease the boycott of Israel as required by Florida law” after being placed on its Scrutinized Companies List, the agency “must refrain from acquiring any and all Unilever assets consistent with the law.”
Jesus they already were bombing at a crazy rate.Israel cut off all telecommunications in Gaza. The last reports indicated that the bombing intensified.
Well it's a demolition they had the control of. A controlled demolition.Iseal and I have different definitions of controlled demolition
All of our countries were OK with it in the past.So, all of our countries are super cool with genocide now eh.
This rules.
Absolutely true.I'm sure the 25,000 dead kids (and the hundreds of thousands starving) in Gaza appreciate that the situation isn't black and white.
Actually, fuck this mealy mouthed bullshit.
The IDF and the Israeli government are bad. Rotten to the genocidal core.
While West Bank settlers continue to murder people for their homes, the few that are left.
The last election in Gaza was in 2006, that was almost 18 years ago. Before the conflict, the median age in Gaza was 18 years old. 70% of the population was under the age of 30. I would say that very few of the people in Gaza had any say in having Hamas in charge of their government.And in this conflict, even the innocence of a high amount of the civilians on both sides is questionable.
The latest death count is at 600-700 people and Israeli witnesses have said that a lot of the deaths were IDF soldiers firing at them.The also dead thousands of Israeli, including children and teenagers falling victim to the biggest terrorist attack in the West since 9/11 might feel like Hamas aren't entirely innocent either though.
So you're deliberately leaving out the 7/10 attack? Nice to know how openly you'll twist the numbers.The latest death count is at 600-700 people and Israeli witnesses have said that a lot of the deaths were IDF soldiers firing at them.
Both sidesing in the middle of a genocide is incredibly mealy mouthed.I'm not being mealy mouthed. I'm not trying to say either side isn't all that bad.
Both sides here are rotten to the core, both sides have killed children, both sides have raped women, both sides have committed war crimes. Israel just has more money and better equipment and USA backing so they can commit more crimes with less repercussions.
I'm not here supporting anyone.Both sidesing in the middle of a genocide is incredibly mealy mouthed.
Nobody here is a fan of Hamas. Nobody here is going to think you’re a Hamas supporter. You don’t have to virtue signal by saying both sides are bad. You can just say Israel is committing a genocide.
John Dillinger would destroy the mortgage paperwork at the banks he would rob as a way of doing the bank's customers a "favor" during the Great Depression, but...same.can you fucking blame them?!? Hamas is willing to fight the oppressors who are taking their land and killing their people. But that doesn't make the actions of Hamas right or not evil.
If you can’t see how it’s mealy mouthed to say in the middle of a genocide “yeah genocide is bad but the people being genocided are real pieces of shit” then I don’t really know what to say that could convince you. I’m being generous when I say it’s mealy mouthed because it’s the best reason for saying it at this time.As I said before, Israel has become a terrorist state that oppresses the Palestinian people. Hamas is an actual terrorist organization. In between are the Palestinian people who have done nothing and deserve none of this. But they also largely support Hamas and that sucks. But can you fucking blame them?!? Hamas is willing to fight the oppressors who are taking their land and killing their people. But that doesn't make the actions of Hamas right or not evil.
It's not mealy mouthed to recognize that there are terrible things going on from both sides, although at this time Israel have upped the ante from asshole maneuvers to outright genocide.
Never said you were supporting anyone. Just that you were being mealy mouthed in your condemnation of an active genocide as you weakly say both sides are bad.I'm not here supporting anyone.
One side is actively committing genocide, and the other side would be if they could.
The Palestinians in Gaza elected Hamas in the last election 17 years ago. There hasn't been an election since then. That means anyone 35 or younger hasn’t been able to have any say in whether they want them in charge or not. 70% of the population in Gaza is that age or younger.I’m curious as to why this conflict is so one-sided in your mind, like the Palestinian people haven’t supported Hamas - which right or wrong they absolutely do. And I frankly don’t blame them. Hamas is the only real entity standing up to Israel so of course they’ll be supported as freedom fighters. But their chilling and shortsighted tactics from the attack have cooled any support they would have received or deserved.
You don’t commit genocide against a government you commit it against a people. If you’re sincere about believing it’s a genocide then you can’t believe it’s a fight between Israel and Hamas.So are people in China. So are people in Zimbabwe. So are people in Ukraine. So are people in at least three other countries with ethnic strife and oppression. There’s literally nothing that I can do about any of it.
And it absolutely IS Israel vs Hamas, even if it’s the Palestinian people who are taking the brunt. Israel has been shit for a long time but it was the absolutely insane terrorist attack AGAINST Israel that kickstarted this recent wave of genocidal acts by the Israeli government.
I’m curious as to why this conflict is so one-sided in your mind, like the Palestinian people haven’t supported Hamas - which right or wrong they absolutely do. And I frankly don’t blame them. Hamas is the only real entity standing up to Israel so of course they’ll be supported as freedom fighters. But their chilling and shortsighted tactics from the attack have cooled any support they would have received or deserved.
A coworker of mine is Jordanian, and this is his take on it as well--that this conflict is not ideological in nature, it is expansionist.Israel's goal isn't to stop Hamas. Its to clear gaza of palestinians. Their governement officials openly talk about it when they arent trying to get US tax dollars.
Remember kids, it's only a war crime if someone with enough power cares to call it that.
You're missing the part where WCK communicated their route ahead of the departure with everyone, including Israel. Times, vehicles and identifications."Oops, that was an accident."
"Three times in a row by accident?"
Basically Israel is targeting relief workers because they want to use famine as a weapon.
Don't worry, they apologised:And those other ones to hit a bunch of international aid workers. Teehee!"
Look what you're making me do! I don't want to do this, you're forcing my hand! I have to commit war crimes now because one of two of our dozens of planned weapon deliveries are temporarily on hold! Look at all the poor children you're making me kill!
I read that article. Nice how they give you absolutely no context for the partial sentence and don't even cite the article so you can read it yourself.
(Graeme Wood is a heartless asshole, amirite?)Neither Hamas source, Adesnik writes, has fully explained where it gets its estimate of the number of unaccounted-for dead: more than 10,000 people. During the war, hospitals have stopped functioning, and keeping people alive has taken higher priority than keeping defensible statistics. But these numbers matter—first, because of the dignity of those killed or still living, and second, because total deaths and the ratio of combatant to noncombatant deaths will have implications for judgments about alleged war crimes and genocide.
Yes, Wood and The Atlantic are obviously monsters for...*actually reads full paragraph*... criticizing Israel for not allowing journalists to observe its actions in Gaza.Israel currently embeds zero journalists in Gaza. It isn’t legally obligated to let journalists join its frontline units. But it doesn’t let journalists into Gaza independently, either. “To allow journalists to report safely,” an Israeli military spokesperson told me, the Israel Defense Forces “accompany them when on the battlefield.” He would not say how many journalists had in fact been allowed to accompany IDF units—let alone accompany them on regular operations, rather than short press tours of battle sites after the action. When Hamas alleges that Israeli soldiers are shooting everyone in sight, and murdering families by flattening buildings devoid of military purpose, it can point to the dead children. Israel can deny the charge and hope that the world trusts it over an avowed terrorist group. The world seldom obliges.
To rebut Hamas’s allegations by letting journalists see the war up close would be a calculated risk. Even when conducted legally, war is ugly. It is possible to kill children legally, if for example one is being attacked by an enemy who hides behind them. But the sight of a legally killed child is no less disturbing than the sight of a murdered one. And Israel has discovered that shutting out the press carries its own risks. An infanticide that no one can see is also going to attract suspicion. Unsympathetic observers will think Israel is conducting its war in the manner of other countries whose counterinsurgent forces have preferred to work out of view of independent media. Russia did this in the Second Chechen War; Sri Lanka, in its civil war. Both countries’ militaries had much to hide.
I don’t believe that Israel will be here in a generation. Businesses are shutting down at just a stunning rate due to a lack of workers available and international businesses are moving away from dealing with Israeli businesses. The IOF was already having problems with recruitment back in June so their military has to be flagging. Then they open up a new front in the war? Against an enemy with an actual military that already fought them to a stand still 18 years ago?"a special, limited military organization across the border to ensure our nation's security"
Netanyahu is now literally just copy pasting Putin's logic and we all stand aside and watch it happen.
Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations (or, they have other branches and aspects as well but have a weaponized terror branch which controls most of their actions, at the very least).
I will not shed a tear of both of them cease to exist.
That doesn't give Israel the right to continuously bombard and now put boots on the ground in other countries.
This is a - bad - remix of the Ukraine War with the Afghan War and some seven-days war thrown in for good measure.
We've long passed the 50,000 dead civilians landmark. The Middle East will remain contentious and a bloodbath for another few generations, and we're all guilty of letting it happen under the guise of anti-terrorism and self-défense.
My dude, I remember when we argued about steak and how to hang toilet paper. That feels.so quaint these days.Remember when we used to argue whether Israel targeted a hospital.
Innocent times.
Don't claim those questions have been settled, you filthy well done abuser of good beef.My dude, I remember when we argued about steak and how to hang toilet paper. That feels.so quaint these days.
My good man, you have misremembered what side of that debate I was on.Don't claim those questions have been settled, you filthy well done abuser of good beef.
Hey man, I can't help what the Wiki saysMy good man, you have misremembered what side of that debate I was on.
Her position feels so goddamn pro-Israel, it's sickening.
lol the genocide will continue until morale improves.
Palestinians died or were killed. Israelis were slaughtered and murdered.Her position feels so goddamn pro-Israel, it's sickening.
it wouldn't shock me if [Trump] wanted to just nuke Gaza or something.
sourceTrump said:“You have to finish up your war,” Trump told the Israel Hayom in an interview that the right-wing newspaper said had been recorded over the weekend. “You have to finish it up, you got to get it done.”
@PatrThom
Not to minimize the fucking trauma, but imagine what the people fucking living there are going through after you've performed your acts of incredible barbarity.The former soldier has spoken publicly about the psychological trauma endured by Israeli troops in Gaza. In a testimony to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, in June, Zaken said that on many occasions, soldiers had to “run over terrorists, dead and alive, in the hundreds.”
Yeah, try to rationalize it somehow.He maintains that the vast majority of those he encountered were “terrorists.”
Two things. First is that I don’t believe that she would actually lose many votes by opposing the Gazan genocide. Anybody who votes solely on who is best for Zionism already has their guy in one Donald Trump. Second is that a president who refuses to do the right thing unless it costs them nothing politically is a president who will accomplish nothing good for anybody.The issue is, as a politician, she can't jeopardize our position in the region. You pull back from Israel and suddenly the whole country is gone. It sucks ass, the whole situation, but it's a damned if you do and damned if you don't because whoever you side with is going to piss off a large group of voters either way. One of the big problems of a huge tent.
Biden and Harris have done nothing to bring a diplomatic end to the Gazan genocide. Biden has worked tirelessly to keep the flow of weapons and money flowing to Israel and backed Netanyahu to the hilt. Which is the exact opposite of pursuing a ceasefire.It also ignores that Biden and Harris have been attempting very hard to get a ceasefire going without being seen as pulling support, but Netanyahu keeps turning them down because Trump has been calling him and promising him more support and less roadblocks towards finishing the job once he is elected. The fact no one has been arrested for any of this behind the scenes dealing is pissing me off, but I've come to realize our DOJ it's too damn afraid of looking partisan in an election year to actually do anything about it. We have to vote and then hopefully when the smoke settles and if we still have a country we can put more of a fire under Netanyahu's ass.
I don’t believe you really know Jewish Americans, especially older ones. Lib in every way until you get to Israel.Two things. First is that I don’t believe that she would actually lose many votes by opposing the Gazan genocide. Anybody who votes solely on who is best for Zionism already has their guy in one Donald Trump.
I know plenty. And yeah they go hard right on Israel but I’m gearing up to vote for a genocidal piece of shit and I expect our places switched plenty of them would still sack up and vote democrat.I don’t believe you really know Jewish Americans, especially older ones. Lib in every way until you get to Israel.