Calleja Mar 21, 2010 #71 Back to the Pun!? Ugh... tell him that it MIGHT be a subtitle.. as in "The Pun Destroyer: Back to the Pun", and then maybe we can talk.
Back to the Pun!? Ugh... tell him that it MIGHT be a subtitle.. as in "The Pun Destroyer: Back to the Pun", and then maybe we can talk.
fade Staff member Mar 21, 2010 #72 Crone;358207][QUOTE=fade said: I like you, Crone. What does that mean? Click to expand... That I'm not a thing, and that I expected you to say that.[/QUOTE] Yes, because, the "thing" pronoun isn't used to refer collectively to people and things by, well, everyone. Like I said to GasBandit before, expecting an obvious response is just part of it being an obvious response.
Crone;358207][QUOTE=fade said: I like you, Crone. What does that mean? Click to expand... That I'm not a thing, and that I expected you to say that.[/QUOTE] Yes, because, the "thing" pronoun isn't used to refer collectively to people and things by, well, everyone. Like I said to GasBandit before, expecting an obvious response is just part of it being an obvious response.
Calleja Mar 21, 2010 #73 I think you don't need that comma after "because" fadesy. (sorry, I'm just really enjoying my annoyingness liberation today)
I think you don't need that comma after "because" fadesy. (sorry, I'm just really enjoying my annoyingness liberation today)