If the government is going to execute someone, I would like them to spend as much time and money as they need to make damn sure they are killing the right person.Well, that seems simple enough to fix.
If the government is going to execute someone, I would like them to spend as much time and money as they need to make damn sure they are killing the right person.Well, that seems simple enough to fix.
If the government is going to execute someone, I would like them to spend as much time and money as they need to make damn sure they are killing the right person.[/QUOTE]Well, that seems simple enough to fix.
I asked a few convicts why they loathe childkillers and child rapists, their answer? "I was a kid once", I lol'ed.As much as I revile some of the people I had to meet when interning at DC, I'm in agreement with Troll and BC here. The Death Penalty is a final end to a sentence with no possibility of undoing it. We can't go 'oopsie' and realize we offed the wrong person and act bashful. That in and of itself is a disgusting miscarriage of justice.
And echoing some of the prison folk here, no he would not do well at all. Childkillers and child rapists are seen as the absolute scum of a prison hierarchy and tend to 'fall' and 'accidentally swallow glass' more than you'd think.
If the government is going to execute someone, I would like them to spend as much time and money as they need to make damn sure they are killing the right person.[/QUOTE]Well, that seems simple enough to fix.
If the government is going to execute someone, I would like them to spend as much time and money as they need to make damn sure they are killing the right person.[/QUOTE]Well, that seems simple enough to fix.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrongful_executioneff that, 2 years should be more than enough for appeals and counter-appeals
Bullet in the brain pan. Squish.I still can't wrap my head around the fact that the death sentence costs MORE than 70+ years in prison. You guys should just kill these scumbags in a humane yet cheap and quick way... bullet to the head. That's it. No more million-dollar injections/red tape.
How's THAT for a liberal's view?
He's intentionally missing it. again, because he's smarter than us.I meant ad nausea. the commercial I was watching at the time of that post was making me sick. Yeah, that's my story.
(but seriously, it was an intentional wrong word)
Oh shit. Crone just made me realize what my response to this should've been: Unless ad is the latin for advertisement, your argument fails."nauseam" is still the latin for Nausea so your argument fails, dude.
this is why your puns are horrible. You beat the shit out any subtlety therein (see my limp point post), and coming from me that's effort. And why, in general, on the subject of language, you excel at being annoying. It's ok, we all have flaws, Fade likes all the wrong things in the world, Chuck likes Tnights, I have mosquito-sized a- cups, and get judged as an idiot before I open my mouth because of being a wimmins, and the universe designed you as the pun destroyer. Don't take this as sarcastic criticism. see it as a business opportunity: I think you should market it it. Sell your services to parents with kids who have dreams of becoming comedians. You can crush them into being the accountants the system needs them to be, and get paid.nah, I'm just the worst kind of grammar/spelling nazi. It's annoying, I know, but I can't help it. Don't take it personally.
I've got Dolph Lundgren on the phone. He's willing to pay us to do it. Should I just hang up on him?Hell no, it'd obviously have to be Bruce Willis.
That I'm not a thing, and that I expected you to say that.I like you, Crone. What does that mean?