T
ThatNickGuy
Le Quack, I do believe he said "smell" AND "secondhand smoke".
Vaporizer, baked goods, loli(pops)... ?For cheap, easy to make materials for hemp material like shirts and rope and such? Absolutely not. It's a shame that the plant has now been given its bad rap as a stoner planet instead of something a little more viable.
I was just pointing out that public opinion was going against smoking right now, where as there was a time where if you DIDN'T smoke, people looked at you funny. It's a shift in public opinion. The fact that many places are switching from smoking sections to just no smoking period (by choice mind you. I'm not talking about places where there are laws against it) is indicative of the paradigm shift.So your argument shifted from a health issue to inconvenience?
Its good to know you respect small business rights, and the right of an individual to make decisions for themselves.
This.That's not what he means. Do you object to someone using THC as a drug, in a way that does not cause smoke? Would you be OK with someone eating hash brownies? Chewing THC gum? Vaporizing? Etc etc.
I think your imagined paradigm shift to a non-smoking culture is a little premature. Hookah lounges are springing up all over the country and doing good business.I was just pointing out that public opinion was going against smoking right now, where as there was a time where if you DIDN'T smoke, people looked at you funny. It's a shift in public opinion. The fact that many places are switching from smoking sections to just no smoking period (by choice mind you. I'm not talking about places where there are laws against it) is indicative of the paradigm shift.
According to the ALA report, hookah bars have appeared in more than two thirds of the nation's states, in some cases operating through exemptions in new smoking bans.
They look rather nifty, and thats part of my question. If the only thing people care about is that it creates smelly smoke. Then why not allow all the other ways that people can get high without smoke?Yeah, you guys seen these crazy new \"electronic cigarettes?\"
Yes a friend of mine has switched to those. It is a neat alternative to the cigarette.Yeah, you guys seen these crazy new \"electronic cigarettes?\"
Much like I find the notion of perceiving myself as a feline less than desirable for any reason.I just find the notion of setting something on fire and then inhaling what's produced to be less than desirable for any substance.
It's moving into specialized locations and into the backrooms, as opposed to being something you always had to deal with no matter where you went. I think the fact that your getting "smoking speakeasys" actually does more to illustrate my point.I think your imagined paradigm shift to a non-smoking culture is a little premature. Hookah lounges are springing up all over the country and doing good business.
http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/2008/01/02/the-rising-allure--and-danger--of-hookah.html
Uhh...not at all. Tinted glasses, much? They're called "HOOKAH BARS". It's not some sheisty operation. They operate in shopping malls. There's probably one within ten miles of your current location.It's moving into specialized locations and into the backrooms, as opposed to being something you always had to deal with no matter where you went. I think the fact that your getting "smoking speakeasys" actually does more to illustrate my point.
That's your right, but my perception of things can't cause you cancer if I do it right next to you.Much like I find the notion of perceiving myself as a feline less than desirable for any reason.
Of course, once again, common decency applies. I'm not advocating blowing smoke in your face. Those people are assholes. What I *am* advocating is for people to take their cancer and vices at their own private will. Who gives a shit if the guy that lives next door tokes? None of my business.That's your right, but my perception of things can't cause you cancer if I do it right next to you.
Just sayin.
I know you loved it babyI had my ass pinched at a gay bar once.
It was awesome.
Doubtful. I have to drive 30 minutes to an hour to get to an open Mall around these parts I haven't been to an arcade in years that wasn't inside a movie theater or bowling alley.Uhh...not at all. Tinted glasses, much? They're called "HOOKAH BARS". It's not some sheisty operation. They operate in shopping malls. There's probably one within ten miles of your current location.
The Juice is right.Uhh...not at all. Tinted glasses, much? They're called \"HOOKAH BARS\". It's not some sheisty operation. They operate in shopping malls. There's probably one within ten miles of your current location.
Okay, so people know the risks of smoking more since 60 years ago. That's fantastic, I agree with you. What's the problem, then? Why can't smokers have their own bars?Doubtful. I have to drive 30 minutes to an hour to get to an open Mall around these parts I haven't been to an arcade in years that wasn't inside a movie theater or bowling alley.
But again I point out that smoking is moving out of theaters, restaurants, bars, and other places where it was a serious problem and instead moving into smaller, specialized locations where like minded individuals can do it freely. You could also probably attribute some of the rise in hookah use to an increase of immigrants from places in the world where it's considered a social activity.
Smoking is probably never going to completely go away, but it's definitely changing from the 50's era where everyone was doing it and thus nobody cared.
That would be because Franklin County passed anti-smoking legislation a year or two ago. A Hookah place would be inherently violating that city ordinance. I'm not surprised to see them up on campus, as OSU is pretty strict about smoking as well. I AM surprised to see one in German Village though.The Juice is right.
I live outside of Dallas in a small town called Denton, population a little over 100K
We've got a six or 7 hookah bars in the main city.
http://tinyurl.com/l6dzmb
DFW has hundreds
http://tinyurl.com/ncqhev
And those are just the ones google maps found on my quick search of \"hookah bars\"
I'd hardly call these little hidden backroom speakeasies. Heh.
Oh, and by the way, Galloway, Ohio has 4 nearby in the big city. The closest is about 13 miles away. Not exactly \"10 miles'..but close enough to make Juski's point valid.
http://tinyurl.com/lazb5q
because fuck em, thats why. To some people smokers are less than human and dont deserve basic human respect.Okay, so people know the risks of smoking more since 60 years ago. That's fantastic, I agree with you. What's the problem, then? Why can't smokers have their own bars?
Thus is demonstrated one of the dangers of straight democracy. If 2 men and a woman are marooned on a desert island, and a vote is called about whether or not her consent is required for sex, democracy means little to her. The "Tyranny of the majority" and all that.because fuck em, thats why. To some people smokers are less than human and dont deserve basic human respect.
I'm not so sure.most 'anti-smoking' ordinances don't cover 'smoking lounges'..originally meant to allow cigar lounges to stay in business. Hookah lounges also would qualify for those exemptions.
you didn't have to prove it for me. I stated it as fact, and you didn't ask for any citations, nor did you dispute the claim. There was no reason for me to go 'proving' anything.
Anyone who has seen me debate a point on the forum should already be aware of two points:
1) I never make a statement that I cannot back up, unless I qualify that statement with a disclaimer (such as "i heard" or "I think I read")
2) I am more than happy to back up my points with citations, if asked. But expect that I will press you to do the same with your own points once I do.