[Movies] MCU: Phase 3 And Beyond

She looks way younger then RDJ ever did...
Well, yeah, and Renner's no spring chicken either. But she doesn't need to look that young. I know most of the time they insist on casting the "ingenue" type ( with the exception of Pepper) but some characters, and definitely Carol, would be better served by casting a slightly more experienced woman.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Well, yeah, and Renner's no spring chicken either. But she doesn't need to look that young. I know most of the time they insist on casting the "ingenue" type ( with the exception of Pepper) but some characters, and definitely Carol, would be better served by casting a slightly more experienced woman.
A "Dynamite Gal?"
 
This kind of fuckin' bullshit is why I'm so bummed out for my friends with a daughter, who is basically my fuckin' niece, who loves super heroes.

 
Last edited:
Last edited:
My daughter and I were looking for superhero stuff on Saturday, lots of Avengers AoU toys, nothing with Black Widow. :/
 
They exist. Whether or not your local toy stores carry them is not the point.

As I just linked above, one of the starting line of toys, which, BTW are available now, is Scarlet Witch and a double pack with Capt. America and Black Widow.

Also, even the article mentions that Hawkeye got similar treatment and hell, I haven't seen ANY Quicksilver merchandise. BW and Hawkeye are kind of in the same tier as far as popularity goes.

I'm all for equal gender representation in merchandising, but this is very pot stirring for the sake of pot stirring, IMO.
 
They exist. Whether or not your local toy stores carry them is not the point.

As I just linked above, one of the starting line of toys, which, BTW are available now, is Scarlet Witch and a double pack with Capt. America and Black Widow.

Also, even the article mentions that Hawkeye got similar treatment and hell, I haven't seen ANY Quicksilver merchandise. BW and Hawkeye are kind of in the same tier as far as popularity goes.

I'm all for equal gender representation in merchandising, but this is very pot stirring for the sake of pot stirring, IMO.
Hawkeye and Black Widow are nowhere near the same in levels of screen time or popularity. Hawkeye was barely in the Avengers.
 
Hawkeye and Black Widow are nowhere near the same in levels of screen time or popularity. Hawkeye was barely in the Avengers.
Supposedly Hawkeye is playing a huge part in AoU, Whedon felt bad that he was mind-controlled for the majority of the movie and didn't do much outside the final battle.
 
If they make any Black Widow merchandise it's usually short packed or, like listed above, you can only get her if you buy some of the other heroes first. There's not a lot of Black Widow solo merchandise and a lot of the time she's left out of group shots. Plus with her movie crossover appearances, she's had a lot of screen time,so it's not like it's she's a minor character.
Sadly, it's not stirring the pot or just someone's imagination. I read an article written by a woman who works in merchandising, in particular for Marvel franchises, and no matter how much they submit ideas, almost no BW merchandise gets put into production (compared to the other guys). While I wouldn't put BW quite up there with Iron Man or Hulk, the Marvel movies are a huge pop culture phenomenon right now and there are a lot of girl fans who aren't getting a lot of options.
 
Last edited:

figmentPez

Staff member
They exist. Whether or not your local toy stores carry them is not the point..
I'd argue that is precisely the point. What gets put on store shelves is part of marketing, and it's pretty clear that getting young women involved in the fandom, or satisfying those who already are fans, is not a priority for any of the companies involved.
 
I'd argue that is precisely the point. What gets put on store shelves is part of marketing, and it's pretty clear that getting young women involved in the fandom, or satisfying those who already are fans, is not a priority for any of the companies involved.
Individual stores make the determination what they stock. If that's the case, go after those stores, but don't say that the toys don't exist, because they clearly do.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
Individual stores make the determination what they stock. If that's the case, go after those stores, but don't say that the toys don't exist, because they clearly do.
If you're talking comic book shops, yes. If you're talking Toys R Us, Target, Wal-Mart, etc. Nope, they don't decide what stock they get, not as far as I know. Those deals are done nationally, and while they may decide how much Avengers merchandise to stock, I'm pretty sure that they get a standard allotment from the line. Unless someone can show differently, I'm pretty sure that they say they want # number of units for backpacks, shirts ,etc. , and the national deal tells them what styles of each specific unit type they get.
 
If you're talking comic book shops, yes. If you're talking Toys R Us, Target, Wal-Mart, etc. Nope, they don't decide what stock they get, not as far as I know. Those deals are done nationally, and while they may decide how much Avengers merchandise to stock, I'm pretty sure that they get a standard allotment from the line. Unless someone can show differently, I'm pretty sure that they say they want # number of units for backpacks, shirts ,etc. , and the national deal tells them what styles of each specific unit type they get.
It's called a planogram, and it's done either regionally or nationally, but it is a decision made by the head office. It not only dictates to stores what they get but where they put them. Stores essentially rent retail space to distributors, who pay for better product placement.

At least that's the way it was done at Shoppers, and at Loblaws, and friends of mine can confirm Canadian Tire as well, and I've heard a rant about an American grocery atore chain doing it to. (The rant was from the perspective of a part time merhandiser- planograms suck. Like i said, they are planned by head office, so 90% of the time there isn't actually enough shelf space to fit what is supposed to fit there).
 
If you're talking comic book shops, yes. If you're talking Toys R Us, Target, Wal-Mart, etc. Nope, they don't decide what stock they get, not as far as I know. Those deals are done nationally, and while they may decide how much Avengers merchandise to stock, I'm pretty sure that they get a standard allotment from the line. Unless someone can show differently, I'm pretty sure that they say they want # number of units for backpacks, shirts ,etc. , and the national deal tells them what styles of each specific unit type they get.
How would these stores benefit from not getting the full set of all action figures offered? I find it highly doubtful that they are refusing to stock the toys I linked. Women have always been represented in all the major toy lines I recall from the 90s on. Marvel has always featured female figures in their toy lines (usually manufactured and distributed by Hasbro).

http://www.walmart.com/search/?query=black widow&cat_id=4171_4172

http://search-en.lego.com/?cc=US&lang=2057&q=black+widow+ultron&ns=1&x=0&y=0

http://www.toysrus.com/search/index...&keywords=black widow&origkw=black+widow&sr=1

The claims that these stores don't carry Black Widow toys is patently false.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
How would these stores benefit from not getting the full set of all action figures offered?
If we're talking about big chains, then each location doesn't get to say "we want all of the line", all they get to say is "we want 50 units from the line" and corporate gets to decide which units they get. If the national deal decides that Black Widow is only 2% of stock, then that order of 50 units gets one BW doll, and has to order 50 more units in order to get another Black Widow.
 
The only action figure of Black Widow that isn't in some two-pack is a Marvel Legends figure, which are marketed (and priced) for adult collectors.
 
The only action figure of Black Widow that isn't in some two-pack is a Marvel Legends figure, which are marketed (and priced) for adult collectors.
See my above link. One is still in the process of being created. It is not available yet.
 
Can't speak for young girls, but most the women my age or older I know who are into the Marvel movies are far more concerned with the Chrises or Tom Hiddleston than Black Widow.
 
Can't speak for young girls, but most the women my age or older I know who are into the Marvel movies are far more concerned with the Chrises or Tom Hiddleston than Black Widow.
A married lesbian friend of mine lusts after Thor mightily. "I don't care that he's a man, he's pretty."
 
How would these stores benefit from not getting the full set of all action figures offered? I find it highly doubtful that they are refusing to stock the toys I linked. Women have always been represented in all the major toy lines I recall from the 90s on. Marvel has always featured female figures in their toy lines (usually manufactured and distributed by Hasbro).

The claims that these stores don't carry Black Widow toys is patently false.
Non-existant? No. Making easily available? Not at all.
Female figures in action figure lines usually weren't part of the first release of a toy line, or if they were, they would be one or two in the whole order, even if they were main characters.. Sometimes only if a toy line was successful they'd include women in the second releases. It's been like this ever since the Star Wars figures. Princess Leia was one of the hardest characters to get. My dad worked at a Kay Bee and UPS for a while in the late 70's/early 80's, and both my parents were huge action figure hunters (He-Mans, Star Trek, Marvel, you name it.) I can remember being a pre-teen and making the KayBee/Toys'R'Us/Mattel outlets,etc. runs with my mom. IF they included female characters, they were usually gone first or you had to know someone who would put them on the side for you. Hell, I was just at Target this morning, and in their huge Age of Ultron toys section, the only Black Widow represented was in group shots on posters. Forget Scarlet Witch or Maria Hill.
When I was at Toys'R'Us* last week, they had a big display of Justice League figurines based on the New 52 line. They had shelves of everyone, they even had multiple poses for Batman or Superman. Except not a single Wonder Woman, even though she's front and center on the packaging.
Little girls and some adults don't always have the time or means to hunt down short packed figures online or at conventions. It's hard enough being a comic fan without people questioning your "credentials", but the fact that they make fans jump through hoops to find their favorite characters is sending the message "we'll toss you a bone, but you're not really welcome here". It doesn't help that when we do get merchandise, it's either small amounts or assuming we want superheroes to be our boyfriends. (IE: the "I want to marry Batman" shirts at Walmart or the Marvel HERoes line.)

Speaking of which, the article I mentioned earlier:Invisible Women: Why Marvel’s Gamora & Black Widow Were Missing From Merchandise
 
I can't say that I'm in love with the designs for a couple of the characters, but I love the fact that they're doing this. We need some super hero stuff that will actually pass the Bechdel test.

On a completely unrelated note, but back to the thread topic, I've only watched two episodes of Daredevil so far. I'm trying to dole it out slowly like a regular TV show and savor it. Man, the fight choreography is gritty, violent, realistic and awesome.
 
Top