I live for meathead feminist Knuckles. Sonic Boom is SO underrated.
It has no plot. It's just a wacky comedy involving the cast of Sonic the Hedgehog, but it's pretty smart for something that should have been disposable. Think "The Adventures of Sonic The Hedgehog", but 3D.Ah. I've never heard of Sonic Boom until today. The only 2 shows I remember were from the 90's and he was voiced by Urkel in both.
So, what was the plot of Sonic Boom?
I'm not sure it's officially been cancelled? I mean, half the show got shifted over to Boomerang but SEGA really was surprised by how much support the show got from it's fan base.Cancelled way before its time.
Another poster has been revealed:Yes, this is the actual poster for the Sonic the Hedgehog movie.
They weren't allowed to put his Prince Albert ring on the poster.Heh. The ring.
But only one? And it's tied in his shoe rather than being through his eyebrow or some other piercing?
How much of a little blue rebel is he going to be if he doesn't have at least one prominent piercing?
--Patrick
They’re saving that for the “Sonic Jr.” sequel.They weren't allowed to put his Prince Albert ring on the poster.
Development hell is PRETTY expensive, main reason why I'm skeptical of any future installments.Ghostbusters 2016 wasn't terrible? I mean, it had MASSIVE script and story problems, but the actresses really weren't an issue.
Really, the biggest question is why they spent so fucking much on the movie.
It's not even that; all that fucking CG must have cost a fortune. Practically the entire last third of the movie is expensive CG and scenes that COULD have been done cheaper with practical effects were done in CG. They spent over 100 million on a comedy that wasn't EVER going to do well overseas. What the hell were they thinking?Development hell is PRETTY expensive, main reason why I'm skeptical of any future installments.
It didn't have a script, that was the problem. It was the typical summer comedy that leaned heavily on improv, rather than scripting things that were actually funny or interesting. Hell, they do the same shitty wonton joke twiceI hated it, but not because most of the characters were women. In fact, I thought that it was a stellar cast. Rather that script was painfully unfunny.
Probably that throwing more money at the problem would solve things, as ya do.It's not even that; all that fucking CG must have cost a fortune. Practically the entire last third of the movie is expensive CG and scenes that COULD have been done cheaper with practical effects were done in CG. They spent over 100 million on a comedy that wasn't EVER going to do well overseas. What the hell were they thinking?
Man, that brought back memories (of the 80s cartoon, not the 70s live series )Original, you say?
I'd have Eddie Redmayne play every part. Seriously.It's been announced that Disney will be developing a live-action remake of The Hunchback of Notre Dame.
Personally, I'd nominate Eddie Redmayne for Quasimodo and Charles Dance for Judge Frollo.
You’re still holding out for them to remake Electra Woman and Dyna Girl again, only this time with Uma Thurman/Maisie Williams, aren’t you.Original, you say?
Twintail Maisie? Yes, please.You’re still holding out for them to remake Electra Woman and Dyna Girl again, only this time with Uma Thurman/Maisie Williams, aren’t you.
—Patrick
I agree. I felt Black Panther was more compelling in Captain America: Civil War than in his own movie.I don't understand Black Panther getting a nomination for best picture. It was no better or worse than any of the other marvel movies. If this is a diversity nomination, I'm fine with that, too...as long as the movie is both good and a good example of diversity. I don't think this movie is frankly good enough for that, though. The plot is standard marvel fare. The acting is average. The score is average. Etc.