I had a huge post ready to go, but I thought better of it. Some of the information might be sensitive, and though I'm confident I'm not giving anything away, I don't want to toe the line.
The incredibly condensed version: Friend of mine was brought up on charges. There were three charges. The allegations made were sketchy, but there would appear to be a kernel of truth. Two charges were dropped, presumably for lack of evidence, but one was pled guilty to.
Just checked the local media's webpage, and their article about the story. There are comments written in obvious ignorance, acting as if a guilty plea on one charge is an admission of all three. There are other comments that are decrying the legal system for allowing a criminal to get by with such light charges, questioning why they would drop the other two.
It doesn't occur to these people that the dropping of two MAJOR charges is an indication that they didn't happen? Is it seriously more reasonable to assume that the crown prosecutor is just lazy? Or toothless?
In the end, Francis was right. Nothing good ever comes from reading the comments.
The incredibly condensed version: Friend of mine was brought up on charges. There were three charges. The allegations made were sketchy, but there would appear to be a kernel of truth. Two charges were dropped, presumably for lack of evidence, but one was pled guilty to.
Just checked the local media's webpage, and their article about the story. There are comments written in obvious ignorance, acting as if a guilty plea on one charge is an admission of all three. There are other comments that are decrying the legal system for allowing a criminal to get by with such light charges, questioning why they would drop the other two.
It doesn't occur to these people that the dropping of two MAJOR charges is an indication that they didn't happen? Is it seriously more reasonable to assume that the crown prosecutor is just lazy? Or toothless?
In the end, Francis was right. Nothing good ever comes from reading the comments.