Super Interesting Read on Marvel's Film Tactics

Status
Not open for further replies.
also lol at the idea that he'd give up tens of millions to split with his costars. That's beyond naive. Why don't the CEOs take half their $50M salary and spread it around in a raise to all their employees?
Depends on what you mean by "all their employees." $50m among 7 costars is fairly substantial; $50m among every employee in a large corporation, say 1m employees (fewer than Walmart employs), is only $50/person/year.

Not that I'm saying RDJ should or shouldn't do it, just that I'm not sure the argument is quite the same as a CEO divvying up her salary.
 
This is just a stupid argument. RDJ is a big part of the success for these films, and he's been paid handsomely for it. Now, he thinks his colleagues should enjoy some of those profits as well. The studio is going the complete other direction and trying to lowball everyone, with threats of recasting as intimidation tactics. How in the world someone decided RDJ is the bad guy in all this is dumbfounding.
 
Tress agreeing with Charlie Don't Surf ? All is right with the world.

Also noone said RDJ was a bad guy in this situation. Just that he's being a bit of a hypocritical douche that owes any semblance of success of his crashed career to these movies.
 
Also noone said RDJ was a bad guy in this situation. Just that he's being a bit of a hypocritical douche that owes any semblance of success of his crashed career to these movies.
What does this have to do with anything though? Yes, the movies helped him succeed. Should he be sitting on his hands and knees begging Disney/Marvel for forgiveness because a movie they hired him for helped bring him out of the funk he was in? Fact is, he was hired to be in the movie. He knew how to negotiate it. He did his job and got paid for it. He does not "owe" Disney/Marvel anything. That is not how business works.

It's like saying that because my boss is employing me right now, for which I am thankful, that I can't call him out on the bullshit he pulls every other week involving the other employees. That guy in the back is not allowed medical insurance while I am? Even though his job is more dangerous? Oh well I better not fight for that other guy to have insurance too because that would make me a hypocrite since this job helped save me from being homeless! WOOP WOOP WOOP.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I don't see how the guy making 50 million telling the company with the movie (just avengers alone) making 1.5 billion to pay his coworkers more is the bad guy because he didn't split up his single digit percentage of the pie up between them.

Let's put it in a graphical context. One # is 10 million dollars.

RDJ's piece
#####
(maybe ####### if things go well)

Avengers' box office gross:
#######################################################################################################################################################

(rounded down about 1.8 million)

Yeah, damn Downey, that greedy guy.
 
Tress agreeing with Charlie Don't Surf ? All is right with the world.

Also noone said RDJ was a bad guy in this situation. Just that he's being a bit of a hypocritical douche that owes any semblance of success of his crashed career to these movies.
Actually, I think he owes his upswing to appearing in plenty of critically acclaimed movies post-career destruction such as Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang, Good Night and Good Luck, Scanner Darkly and Zodiac. Even without Iron Man, he hit the summer blockbuster territory with Tropic Thunder.
 
So here's the deal. Every so often a movie series makes it big. When everyone's contract is up they all start fighting.

Recently the actors like to take the fights public because they get more sympathy when they show the disparity between their pay and the movie's gross profits.

The studios then start talking about replacing them in order to temper expectations.

Then, eventually, they all sit down and agree on a private deal and go about making the next set of movies.

This isn't a new pattern, and its not unexpected. They replaced Terrence Howard with don cheedle from one to two, and no one cares now. Everyone was up in arms when Richard Harris died and Michael gambon replaced him for dumbledore in Harry potter, and today many still claim he doesn't fully embody dumbledore from the books, but that isn't preventing anyone from going and watching and enjoying the movies.

So the threat isn't idle.

However, just like the Simpsons voice actors every few years, this little song and dance will go on.

It's simply part of the negotiation process, and it'll play out over time.

Just keep in mind that even though an actor currently playing the part embodies it right now, that doesn't exclude the possibility that another actor wouldn't actually be better at it. I know few people who actually believe that the first person to play batman or James Bond on the silver screen was the best.

Anyone who claims the actors that have embodied the role so far is the absolute best choice possible is little more than a fanboy with a short sight.
 
I know few people who actually believe that the first person to play batman or James Bond on the silver screen was the best.
I agree with everything you've said, but there are a ton of people who think Sean Connery was the best Bond.
 
I agree with everything you've said, but there are a ton of people who think Sean Connery was the best Bond.
True, and its not the best example, but I suspect if you survey the average 25 to 35 year old, who the studios target, you'd probably find different results, simply because as good as those were at the time, they are clearly dated and aren't being shown on TV as often as they were when you and I were in our formative years. Only those that go out of their way to watch them (bond marathons, etc) would have basis to compare bonds over the years.
 
Why did Disney give Mickey Mouse only three fingers?


So he could not pick up a check. -Robin Williams
When he was having contract issues over Aladdin,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top