Big-mouth guys popping pills in dark rooms, chasing after everything in a skirt that looks like a target and shy away from everything that might bite back, to a techno beat? No clue what that would look like.What if Pac-man was real?
No carbs!Went to an Indo-Chinese buffet today. Uff so stuffed.
hakka noodles were present in obscene amounts.
These are my rules for a churrascaria
I haven't even watched the video, but you said the magic word.These are my rules for a churrascaria
Welp
Now I want a reaction for WELL DUUUUUHHHHH...![]()
Human Intelligence Sharply Declining
No, it's not just you — people really are, per a number of surveys, way less intelligent than they used to be.futurism.com
The article does say the trend started prior to COVID, and it does draw the distinction between intelligence vs intellect.It looks like the article makes a point of specifying that it's talking about decreases in specific, measurable skillsets - attention span, reading by quantity, basic numeracy - that would pretty transparently be impacted by the advent and increasing use of smartphones, and not in actual human intellect which would seem a lot more alarming if it were decreasing in a measurable way. It's also focused on studies targeting teenagers, who were presumably the most impacted by covid and who also don't have any experience of a world without a handheld computer to do all their math for them.
Or, in other words, the title is alarmist clickbait that only tangentially relates to the meat of the article, but you need to have the attention span and ability to engage intelligently with information to recognize that, skills which the article says are on the decline.
I remember that even when I got a basic cellular phone that could remember phone numbers for me, my ability to remember phone numbers went from "I can reliably recall about 20 numbers at will" to "I can barely remember my own phone number."Though there has been a demonstrably steep decline in cognitive skills since the COVID-19 pandemic due to the educational disruption it presented, these trends have been in evidence since at least the mid-2010s, suggesting that whatever is going on runs much deeper and has lasted far longer than the pandemic.
...
There isn't any reason to suggest that human intellect has been harmed, the publication counters — but in "both potential and execution," our intelligence is definitely on the downturn.
My goto example is that I know what my best friend’s parents’ landline number 20 years ago was, but not his number today.I remember that even when I got a basic cellular phone that could remember phone numbers for me, my ability to remember phone numbers went from "I can reliably recall about 20 numbers at will" to "I can barely remember my own phone number."
I don't remember anyone's phone number today. But when I moved back to TX from VA, I could easily remember my old TDL #, and I remember my old 7-digit phone number from when I was growing up. I just don't think about some things enough for them to stick in long term memory like I used to have to. If you aren't continually having to refresh your memory of something, those neural pathways don't get reinforced and they just don't stick around.The article does say the trend started prior to COVID, and it does draw the distinction between intelligence vs intellect.
FTA:
I remember that even when I got a basic cellular phone that could remember phone numbers for me, my ability to remember phone numbers went from "I can reliably recall about 20 numbers at will" to "I can barely remember my own phone number."
It also uses data about American adults to support conclusions from the research that exclusively evaluated the skills of teenagers, and offers up studies of 15- to 18-year-olds to support its assertion that the impacts it's talking about are "across age groups." There's some interesting information and some citations, but the article as a whole is pretty unfocused and largely divorced from the claim the title makes. The concluding sentence in particular reads as either very unclear - the terms they use are not at all clearly defined - or as contradicting itself.The article does say the trend started prior to COVID, and it does draw the distinction between intelligence vs intellect.
I feel like most people would fail this test because they haven't memorized the knowledge required for it, and aren't able to regurgitate it onto the test paper.Where's that "impossible" 8th grade exam from way back? Ah, here we go:
--Patrick![]()
An 1895 8th Grade Final Exam: I Couldn't Pass It. Could You?
An old pal from Brandeis—Sheldon Gray—has a knack for the ironic. He's very well educated, and so am I. But I don't know whether we could pass this test, from 1895 in what looks like a little red schoolhouse in Salina, Kansas, at all. Let alone with flying colors. Shelly sent on this object...newrepublic.com
You ever go to a website and it's got @GasBandit posting all over it?