Nah, they cut most arts funding. That's just going to clinch that arts funding only leads to terrible filth that the Canadian citizens must be shielded from, Papa Harper demands.
Maybe it's more that "why are Canadians as a whole paying for art, if they like it or not?" If somebody likes it, they buy it. If they don't, they don't. Don't make everybody be a part of "buying" it. Waste of money IMO. Not saying it's a waste to buy art as a whole (it's not), but not something governments should be spending money on.Nah, they cut most arts funding. That's just going to clinch that arts funding only leads to terrible filth that the Canadian citizens must be shielded from, Papa Harper demands.
Why are we paying for war, whether we like it or not? Or the oil pipeline? Why are we paying for healthcare whether we like it or not? Same argument can be made to virtually everything taxes go towards, and each area is going to mean more to some people than to others.Maybe it's more that "why are Canadians as a whole paying for art, if they like it or not?" If somebody likes it, they buy it. If they don't, they don't. Don't make everybody be a part of "buying" it. Waste of money IMO. Not saying it's a waste to buy art as a whole (it's not), but not something governments should be spending money on.
They shouldn't. Just as virtually any other business shouldn't either. I'm sure that somebody could probably make a case as to why it's beneficial to subsidize some businesses for the good of all, but even that isn't a good enough reason. Government should be involved in certain areas because it's essential for them to be involved, not because it would be beneficial for them to be involved. That's the difference in my eyes.But what you, and Mr Harper, are missing is that arts is a BUSINESS, and in Canada, arts actually bring in a lot of revenue (For example, just about every American animated show on TV, if it's not animated in South Korea, is animated here, thanks to tax write-offs). Take those away, it will hurt an entire industry. Not to mention the films and TV shows shot in Vancouver and Toronto.
Because one is lowering taxes, and the other is a hand-out. I think subsidies of ALL kinds are a load of crap. I'm not singling out the art industry.Take that to the smaller scale, and yeah you've got independent freelance sculptors and painters, graphic designers, etc, who are able to make ends meet thanks to government funding. How's that ANY different, tell me, than virtually anybody else who owns their own business getting to make write offs? Except of course that they get paid less for their work and are more often completely screwed by their contractors?
We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more serious matterswait wait wait...
There's politics in canada?
Enh, I don't really feel like arguing the point. I'm really only bothered when people group arts alone as it's own seperate thing that is somehow lesser than and beneath other forms of business. Other than that, while I may disagree, the issues not as important to me. And really I don't completely disagree, in many cases the only reason this subsidizing exists is because it keeps it here rather than elsewhere.They shouldn't. Just as virtually any other business shouldn't either. I'm sure that somebody could probably make a case as to why it's beneficial to subsidize some businesses for the good of all, but even that isn't a good enough reason. Government should be involved in certain areas because it's essential for them to be involved, not because it would be beneficial for them to be involved. That's the difference in my eyes.
Now with many industries, we (and other nations) have painted ourselves into a corner. If one nation gives subsidies, then almost all are "forced" to in order to compete. If none gave subsidies, it would all be a level playing field still. But even that is not a good enough reason IMO. If an industry can't survive without government handouts, then why are we hurting ourselves by supporting it?
Because one is lowering taxes, and the other is a hand-out. I think subsidies of ALL kinds are a load of crap. I'm not singling out the art industry.
And I'd say if you want to continue, we do have a politics forum. I'm more OK arguing there than here, which is more lighthearted.
No they changed their minds and let her compete when their lawyers said, "Really? Really!"I thought she was disallowed? Or is that not who I think it is?
“We were pretty upset when we saw the painting,” David Morelli, spokesman for Tim Hortons, told QMI Agency. “We'd never flip the tab on a hot coffee before serving a naked customer. Obvious safety hazard.”http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/dail...rper-painting-display-kingston-162138227.html
My eyes burn, and so must yours:
View attachment 6278
Ok, I'm lost, who is she?No they changed their minds and let her compete when their lawyers said, "Really? Really!"
I hope this is an actual quote.“We were pretty upset when we saw the painting,” David Morelli, spokesman for Tim Hortons, told QMI Agency. “We'd never flip the tab on a hot coffee before serving a naked customer. Obvious safety hazard.”
Sittin' here, working...It's the May 24th week end!
What are ya at?
You're just trying to make me jealous. The Chronicle Herald once spelled Hospital with and 8. On the front page, above the fold...Well that was some excellent reporting by the Toronto Star then.