My take is that it's so the reader can still feel superior to the protagonist.I never understood the "everyone's a douche" writing style that seems so prevalent lately.
--Patrick
My take is that it's so the reader can still feel superior to the protagonist.I never understood the "everyone's a douche" writing style that seems so prevalent lately.
I'd say more Shadowrun with less cyberpunk.Like Ugly Americans, only with fantasy instead of horror?
Yeah, my brother said Alien Nation, too.Has an "Alien Nation with a budget" feel to it too.
You know, the trailer, or teaser, whatever, I thought It (movie) was going to be a bit truer to the book. This one feels like they're really deviating from the source material. Time will tell if that's a good thing or not.
I remember my dad liked it. I saw bits and pieces, but not enough to tell you.They made a show based on that movie, anyone know if it was good?
It was mixed.They made a show based on that movie, anyone know if it was good?
I remember it being better than the movie.They made a show based on that movie, anyone know if it was good?
This is true as the series was able to delve into the backstory of the aliens a lot more but it was overall an uneven series.I remember it being better than the movie.
I had a similar thought. "This is just Alien Nation with better effects and much more annoying accents."First time I saw District 9, I thought this is alien nation.
It was a little bit Tremors-y at times, but it was pretty good.They made a show based on that movie, anyone know if it was good?
Haven't watched this new trailer yet, but it's kind of impossible to be true to that book. It's just too big, too much happens. One of the 1990 movie's flaws was trying to stuff too many scenes from the book without making them work as a story, so you get a lot of parts that don't work or don't make any sense. Best way to do an adaptation is to maintain the spirit of the source, and using its elements to tell a story that works in the new medium. Like, that conversation in the other trailer doesn't happen in the book IIRC, but that kind of back and forth with Eddie and Richie is true to the characters, even displaced by 30 years.[DOUBLEPOST=1501211113,1501210769][/DOUBLEPOST]Okay, now having watched this new trailer, I'm a little less psyched for the movie. I'm hoping that's just trailer flash that's making Pennywise look hyper and stupid.You know, the trailer, or teaser, whatever, I thought It (movie) was going to be a bit truer to the book. This one feels like they're really deviating from the source material. Time will tell if that's a good thing or not.
How am I supposed to watch this and not get a Black Panther feel from it? He's even using the same accent!I'm not sure who it was I told to watch Chadwick Boseman's flick Redbelt but this looks promising
Isn't this a remake of a Jackie Chan film that isn't even out yet?How am I supposed to watch this and not get a Black Panther feel from it? He's even using the same accent!
That looks fucking awesome and I can't wait to see it.
Not much in this world is as tone deaf as this. Jesus fucking Christ.
Just a more modern movie for the next George Zimmerman to idolize.Guns will save the world, but cops are useless.
Got it.
Ok, Jack Thompson.Just a more modern movie for the next George Zimmerman to idolize.
Fuck off, I didn't say media makes people do shit. I just think it's a shitty, tone deaf movie.Ok, Jack Thompson.
Because the police are incapable of doing anything.Fuck off, I didn't say media makes people do shit. I just think it's a shitty, tone deaf movie.
Angry white guy buys a gun and takes the law into his oooown hands. What a bad ass.
Fuck off, I didn't say media makes people do shit.
Here you are directly implying that this movie will be an influence on the next controversial shooting.Just a more modern movie for the next George Zimmerman to idolize.
You're entitled to your opinion. Me, I think it looks like a good popcorn flick to see with friends.I just think it's a shitty, tone deaf movie.
Is this your first movie trailer? John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis and oh yeah, Charles Bronson (among countless others) have been scratching this cinematic itch for decades upon decades. Sorry it triggers your phobia and need to make everything about grinding your political axe.Angry white guy buys a gun and takes the law into his oooown hands. What a bad ass.
I'm pretty sure he's talking about how a black man is shot by a white man on screen, and how it's "tone deaf" because of current events meaning movies aren't allowed to portray such events as anything other than the worst racist hate crime imaginable.I think he might be talking about the muddling between serious drama and light-hearted action flick in the same trailer. Like the sudden appearance of "Back in Black" was just off-putting and changed the tone of the trailer.
Not much in this world is as tone deaf as this. Jesus fucking Christ.
Guns will save the world, but cops are useless.
When seconds matter, the cops are only minutes away.[DOUBLEPOST=1501791538,1501791271][/DOUBLEPOST]TBH I was going to post something snarky about how I saw that movie back when it was called Collateral Damage, but all the quasipolitical butthurt about its "tone deafness" immediately endeared it to meBecause the police are incapable of doing anything.
Apparently, this remake has been a decade in the making. One of the folks attached to direct was Joe Carnahan, with his top choices for the lead being Liam Neeson or Frank Grillo.I am impressed that it has taken them this long to remake Deathwish seeing as the original was released in '74.