But killing people in AC is so satisfying.I'm not a fan of games like Batman: Arkcam Asylum, Arkcam city, Assassin's Creed, etc...
Although the story is interesting and fun the first time around, these types of games are way too easy and clearly designed for the PS3/ Xbox 360 generation (who want or have no desire for any sort of challenge).
Brawling in Arkham Asylum/Arkham City isn't meant to be treated like a fight for your life. It's a puzzle in how to take down all of the guys in the flashiest, batmaniest way possible while achieving the highest combo score.
?To each his own. I'm more of a fps fan.
Surely you can't be serious.I'm not a fan of games like Batman: Arkcam Asylum, Arkcam city, Assassin's Creed, etc...
Although the story is interesting and fun the first time around, these types of games are way too easy and clearly designed for the PS3/ Xbox 360 generation (who want or have no desire for any sort of challenge).
?
Surely you can't be serious.
Yeah he kind of double standard-ed that didn't he??
Surely you can't be serious.
That you claimed to like more serious games than the Xbox360/PS3 gen when FPS is all about that gen. Which current gen FPS like Battlefield 3 are all about mindless zero skill.Serious about what? That I find it more fun to play Battlefield 3 over Arkcam City?
On a related note, I'm tired of games that require you to replay them until you memorize the relevant fixed patterns. For instance, I kinda like DDR. It's enjoyable on the lower levels where it's just a test of your reflexes. But when you turn up the difficulty, it's no longer a matter of how quickly you can translate what's on screen into your footwork, instead it's just a test of how many times you have played that song/level so you could memorize the moves.the story is interesting and fun the first time around, these types of games are way too easy and clearly designed for the PS3/ Xbox 360 generation (who want or have no desire for any sort of challenge).
Fucking hell, it's Diablo 3 all over.
But FPS games are so by-the-numbers at this point they're practically a Madden franchise. I understand if you don't care for the brawler/stealth genre, but disliking them for your reasons and then preferring the most pandering, shallow genre on consoles short of sports games is kind of hypocritical.To each his own. I'm more of a fps fan.
Yet he used Battlefield 3 as an example.In fairness, there are some good, quality, high-skill shooters out there.
But FPS games are so by-the-numbers at this point they're practically a Madden franchise. I understand if you don't care for the brawler/stealth genre, but disliking them for your reasons and then preferring the most pandering, shallow genre on consoles short of sports games is kind of hypocritical.
Yeah he kind of double standard-ed that didn't he?
That you claimed to like more serious games than the Xbox360/PS3 gen when FPS is all about that gen. Which current gen FPS like Battlefield 3 are all about mindless zero skill.
As long as someone enjoys a game,it fullfills its purpose.Dosnt matter if it is a jewel of storytellin, a genre changing blockbuster hit or
a 13th release of the same game,with updated graphics. You buy what you enjoy.Your enjoyment wont lessen just because someone else dosnt like your type of game.
Related: I have a friend who won't play a game until he's read up about how to play it/beat it/get everything. He also won't play multiplayer games against us, his own friends, unless he has some sort of advantage. It's like people won't let themselves be challenged or possibly lose.Thing I hate: People who don't even bother to try to figure things out for themselves before asking in general chat. The inanity over on PoE's open beta is insane. "How do I walk forward?" "Is this a good gem?" "Where to I go?" "What quest comes after the first one?" "Are there active skills?" "What's the currency?" "How do I get back to town?" "What's the best build for x class?"
Fuck's sake people, play the fucking game for yourselves. Give it a try for 5 goddamn minutes before whining on the chat channels.
Or at the very least use the internet. I mean damn people.Thing I hate: People who don't even bother to try to figure things out for themselves before asking in general chat. The inanity over on PoE's open beta is insane. "How do I walk forward?" "Is this a good gem?" "Where to I go?" "What quest comes after the first one?" "Are there active skills?" "What's the currency?" "How do I get back to town?" "What's the best build for x class?"
Fuck's sake people, play the fucking game for yourselves. Give it a try for 5 goddamn minutes before whining on the chat channels.
Eh... depends on the game. AC1 and AC3 have challenge guard escapes, but the Ezio games made it way too easy. The carriage stuff is pretty forgiving as well. And then Ubisoft is good at coming up with shit that's difficult without being fun, like catching flying pieces of paper, or arranging assassins in a tower defense, or doing side missions for money you don't need for a pointless investment mini-game in a town you only have to go to for quests. Da Vinci flying missions ... ugh.On the same page, some of the stuff you can do in Assassin's Creed is definitely not easy. Catching the almanac pages, for one, or protecting your caravans/escaping high threat from guards. Generally you've gotta be quick on your reflexes to get those things done without failing miserably.
I liked AC3 but I felt Conner was bland as fuck. Also the whole American Revolution appeal was MEH to me.Eh... depends on the game. AC1 and AC3 have challenge guard escapes, but the Ezio games made it way too easy. The carriage stuff is pretty forgiving as well. And then Ubisoft is good at coming up with shit that's difficult without being fun, like catching flying pieces of paper, or arranging assassins in a tower defense, or doing side missions for money you don't need for a pointless investment mini-game in a town you only have to go to for quests. Da Vinci flying missions ... ugh.
And yet I buy each entry in the series. I think AC3 will be the last one. I don't like where things are headed since the lead guy left after AC:Brotherhood.
Gods yes.That there isn't more Okami.
Are you referring to Enzio as the "lead guy", or do you mean the developer? I honestly don't know why everyone hates Desmond so much, and I actually preferred Altair over Enzio. I do realize that I'm way in the minority, though. Anywho, the entire point of the series is that the protagonists will keep changing as they move through the generations.Eh... depends on the game. AC1 and AC3 have challenge guard escapes, but the Ezio games made it way too easy. The carriage stuff is pretty forgiving as well. And then Ubisoft is good at coming up with shit that's difficult without being fun, like catching flying pieces of paper, or arranging assassins in a tower defense, or doing side missions for money you don't need for a pointless investment mini-game in a town you only have to go to for quests. Da Vinci flying missions ... ugh.
And yet I buy each entry in the series. I think AC3 will be the last one. I don't like where things are headed since the lead guy left after AC:Brotherhood.
I only ever had to plan ahead for a SINGLE mission... and it was a mission for the Hunting society. Remember that stupid bobcat chase? Yeah, I said fuck that and just put a proximity mine in the canyon near the start of the chase. Started it and he runs right into it, blowing him up and making him do cartwheels.I severely missed GOOD missions however, you know, the kind where you planned ahead to get to your target? Yeah, barely any of that.
I used the whip thing, managed to get him on the 3rd try. You can't beat his speed anyways.I only ever had to plan ahead for a SINGLE mission... and it was a mission for the Hunting society. Remember that stupid bobcat chase? Yeah, I said fuck that and just put a proximity mine in the canyon near the start of the chase. Started it and he runs right into it, blowing him up and making him do cartwheels.
Never felt so satisfied.