His birth certificate!Benghazi! Yemen!
I literally cannot think of any democrat candidate who could/would win against Trump.But he won't. He's just saying that so he can try and get reelected. Which he will unless the left jettisons Biden.
Sadly, I agree. There is a serious lack of charisma and/or broad appeal in the Democratic Party right now. The only people with charisma have policy positions that scare too many voters away, and the people with more broad appeal don’t really know how to win people over.I literally cannot think of any democrat candidate who could/would win against Trump.
You understood that correctly, and it WAS true. Then, after he was elected, he refused to confirm he wouldn’t run for re-election and has hinted repeatedly that he will run again.If I understand correctly, I think Biden said he was only doing one term and wouldn't seek re-election. I think I heard they were grooming Kamala Harris to take his place for the next election.
And...while don't hate Harris, I don't see her faring well. Maybe faring better than Hilary, but not enough to win.
I despise her because she has no qualms about throwing innocent people under the bus to further her own power goals.She is disliked by the left and the right.
AOC? She'll be 35 in 2024 which is the minimum age for being President.I literally cannot think of any democrat candidate who could/would win against Trump.
Democrat establishment will fight like rabid wolverines in order to stop that. And I have no doubt that Pelosi and her ilk would gladly do everything in their power to insure a Trump win in an AOC/Trump fight.AOC? She'll be 35 in 2024 which is the minimum age for being President.
Totally valid, sure. I didn’t say the left doesn’t have good reason to dislike Harris. I’m just pointing out that they do.I despise her because she has no qualms about throwing innocent people under the bus to further her own power goals.
Again, no argument there. Should people support progressive policies more? Probably. But they don’t.It's like they would rather stand in water up to their ankles while they die of thirst.
Oh, wait. That's a different group.
Or maybe it isn't.
--Patrick
What polls are you basing that on?Again, no argument there. Should people support progressive policies more? Probably. But they don’t.
Maybe, maybe not. Trump voters will turn out to vote for Trump anyway. And a lot of Dem voters will stay away if AOC is the nomination, you're right there. But I think a lot of people that don't normally vote because they don't see the difference between the parties will turn out for AOC.But seriously, AOC cannot win a general election. At all. About 45% of the country hates her by reputation alone. Another 10%-15% will reject her actual policies for being too far left. The country as a whole is not supportive enough of the Progressive platform for AOC to actually win. It would be a Trump (or DeSantis) landslide.
Because 100% of the establishment Dems in charge of making those decisions want to maintain the status quo, not make meaningful changes to it. Helping the poors has to be done at the expense of the rich and powerful, and I don't think it's any secret which side of that line the party's leadership is on.why not roll the dice and gamble on someone who will probably lose but might just pull it off?
Dems might want to reevaluate their strategy if a good portion of their base won’t come out for any candidate left of center. Seems like they’ve selected a bad base for a party claiming to be on the left.Maybe, maybe not. Trump voters will turn out to vote for Trump anyway. And a lot of Dem voters will stay away if AOC is the nomination, you're right there. But I think a lot of people that don't normally vote because they don't see the difference between the parties will turn out for AOC.
Will these extra voter be greater than the number of people who will now stay home? Maybe, maybe not. But if anyone else the Dems put forward will lose to Trump anyway, why not roll the dice and gamble on someone who will probably lose but might just pull it off?
I'm from the UK, I've never considered them to be left of centre. Centre-right at best.Dems might want to reevaluate their strategy if a good portion of their base won’t come out for any candidate left of center. Seems like they’ve selected a bad base for a party claiming to be on the left.
Yeah realizing how far right the democrats are has been one of the biggest disappointments of my leftward movement.I'm from the UK, I've never considered them to be left of centre. Centre-right at best.
Yep. I've said it before. If Democrats ran in any other country, they would likely be considered right-leaning more than left. Biden would probably make for a good Conservative leader here in Canada. (Whereas, as I've said before, AOC, Sanders, and Warren would probably fit well with the NDP or Green)I'm from the UK, I've never considered them to be left of centre. Centre-right at best.
Well you’re lying about what makes up “establishment” Democrats and pretending that it includes the democratic base. Don’t know what anybody on the left has said where you could honestly put poor blacks as a synonym for establishment Democrats.Pew Research says only 12% of Democrats are Progressives, and they tend to be White (68% are non-Hispanic White) and highly educated (i.e. not 'the poors'). 40% of Black Democrats are Democratic Mainstay (which is the most diverse group and tends to identify as moderate), but only 6% of Black Democrats are Progressive (7% for Hispanic Democrats, 10% for Asian Democrats). Democratic Mainstay also tends to have the lowest education levels (i.e. 'the poors').
So, why the low support for Progressives by other demographics? (In contrast,15% of White Democrats are Progressive.) Could Progressives have a White Privilege/White Savior problem? (See also: Feminism) Did anyone in the Progressive camp ask PoC (or 'the poors', or marginalized people in general) what they think about Progressive policies, or is it yet more "We're white and educated, so we know what's best for you!" (see also: Feminism).
Maybe reflect on that when blaming 'establishment' Democrats (the Democratic Mainstays & Establishment Liberals, so 49% of White Dems, 47% of Hispanic Dems, 62% of Black Dems, 51% of Asian Dems) for the failures of Progressives and Progressive policy. Because it looks like the 'establishment' is not as White and wealthy as you think they are, and Progressives are not as diverse as you think they are.
Since you hate on Moderates (the "bad base") so much, I assumed that's who you mean by "establishment" since we're talking about appealing to voters. That's my mistake, but I specifically pointed out that I was referring to Democratic Mainstays and Establishment Liberals from the survey, who make up the majority of Democrats (so, the base that the Democrats need to appeal to). The data still says that there is low support for Progressives, especially with PoC (which should be a red flag), so it doesn't make sense for the Democrats to throw all their support behind Progressive candidates until they have broader appeal.Well you’re lying about what makes up “establishment” Democrats and pretending that it includes the democratic base. Don’t know what anybody on the left has said where you could honestly put poor blacks as a synonym for establishment Democrats.
Depends on what you mean by sense. I don’t think it makes any sense for Democrats to continue their death spiral moving ever more to the right in an attempt to placate voters who are beyond reasoning with at this point. I don’t think it makes any sense for Democrats to fail at accomplishing anything when they control both houses of Congress and the presidency and just accept huge defeats like the upcoming overturning of Roe V Wade with a shrug and a “we’ll vote harder next time.” Nor do I think that it makes any sense for establishment Democrats to fight like demons against anybody left of center while propping up hard right Democrats like Cuellar.Since you hate on Moderates (the "bad base") so much, I assumed that's who you mean by "establishment" since we're talking about appealing to voters. That's my mistake, but I specifically pointed out that I was referring to Democratic Mainstays and Establishment Liberals from the survey, who make up the majority of Democrats (so, the base that the Democrats need to appeal to). The data still says that there is low support for Progressives, especially with PoC (which should be a red flag), so it doesn't make sense for the Democrats to throw all their support behind Progressive candidates until they have broader appeal.
Democrats are not moving Right. Every article/study I've found says the opposite. Democrats have been moving Left (or returning Left).Depends on what you mean by sense. I don’t think it makes any sense for Democrats to continue their death spiral moving ever more to the right in an attempt to placate voters who are beyond reasoning with at this point. I don’t think it makes any sense for Democrats to fail at accomplishing anything when they control both houses of Congress and the presidency and just accept huge defeats like the upcoming overturning of Roe V Wade with a shrug and a “we’ll vote harder next time.” Nor do I think that it makes any sense for establishment Democrats to fight like demons against anybody left of center while propping up hard right Democrats like Cuellar.
But I suppose you look at the Biden administration accomplishments of nothing and nod your head cause this shitshow was clearly what the voters wanted when we voted in 2020.
Old people dying off is probably the single most helpful trend for progressive causes.Remember how in the 90s, marriage equality seemed impossible? And now 70% of all Americans support marriage equality. That's not just Liberals, that's 55% of Republicans, too.
So you are still lying about the democrat establishment being the democrat base?Democrats are not moving Right. Every article/study I've found says the opposite. Democrats have been moving Left (or returning Left).
A sample:
Why Democrats Have Shifted Left Over the Last Thirty Years
Democrats Aren't Moving Left. They're Returning to Their Roots
I think we can also conclude that current Democrat leadership is incapable of doing so since they’ve proven completely inept at moving the needle.If Democrats want to win and protect our rights like Roe, they need to convince Republicans that they offer a better plan (38% of Republicans support abortion rights in all or most cases). Or convince non-voters to get off their asses to protect our rights. Neither is going to be accomplished by simply attacking moderates ad nauseam.
I remember Obama being too chickenshit to come out publicly for marriage equality because he was worried that it would anger his black religious base. And then I remember how his private support for gay marriage helped shift the polls not a single percentage but him actually coming out and publicly supporting gay marriage swung the black religious community to support gay marriage practically overnight.Remember how in the 90s, marriage equality seemed impossible? And now 70% of all Americans support marriage equality. That's not just Liberals, that's 55% of Republicans, too.
Is accusing someone of intentionally misleading really necessary? My 10 year old does, whether or not someone is misinformed, makes an error, or is, in fact, intentionally misleading. Is that the level of discourse we are striving for here?So you are still lying about the democrat establishment being the democrat base?
I wish I didn’t have to but this is the second time she has done so in this conversation. So I think it’s called for.Is accusing someone of intentionally misleading really necessary? My 10 year old does, whether or not someone is misinformed, makes an error, or is, in fact, intentionally misleading. Is that the level of discourse we are striving for here?