Funny Pictures Thread. It begins again

figmentPez

Staff member
Of course it does, it's yeast. Labeling it Gluten-free is just marketing designed to get saps who hop on the latest diet trends.
Yeah, the big bold neon lettering is from the diet-fad, but my friends and family who are either allergic to wheat or have celiac disease are none-the-less really happy that there are a lot more gluten-free products on the market these days. For them, having yeast that is gluten-free is nice, because it's not a given that yeast (or any other packaged product) will be gluten-free.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I don't feel sorry for a lot of people, but I really do feel sorry for those who have wheat sensitivities/celiac disease. I can't imagine not being able to eat stuff with gluten in it.
 
I don't feel sorry for a lot of people, but I really do feel sorry for those who have wheat sensitivities/celiac disease. I can't imagine not being able to eat stuff with gluten in it.
Since he just passed, I feel obligated to post a John Pinette clip.

 
My mother in law has celiac and before gluten free became a fad diet, trying to travel was scary and stressful because she never knew if she'd be able to find something to eat if something went wrong en route. And she was dangerously underweight at the time because she lost so much weight before her doctor figured out what was wrong.
 
That is a doughnut of unspeakable evil and should be eaten with a big cup of coffee cast into the fires of Mount Doom.
 
That man knows the power of Sta-Flo. Once upon a time, lo these many moons ago, I had a pair of cammies that could do that. Pulled them out for inspections only.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
3G ... Poor bastard
No, dialup. 3G is actually faster than dialup by several times. To qualify as "3g" there's a minimum your service has to meet - 200kbit. Some 3g service has actually gone up to between 1-3 megabit.

Dialup capped out at 56kbit.
 
Some 3g service has actually gone up to between 1-3 megabit.
Dialup capped out at 56kbit.
The 3G service that AT&T keeps pushing (more like 3.5G) can go as high as 6-7Mb (this is the HSPA+ service they advertise as "4G speeds").
Also, 56k modems would never go higher than 53.3k in practice due to crosstalk. There were plenty of times I would drop back to V.34 33.6k just to keep the reliable connection rather than a faster one that would drop every 10min.

--Patrick
 

GasBandit

Staff member
The 3G service that AT&T keeps pushing (more like 3.5G) can go as high as 6-7Mb (this is the HSPA+ service they advertise as "4G speeds").
Also, 56k modems would never go higher than 53.3k in practice due to crosstalk. There were plenty of times I would drop back to V.34 33.6k just to keep the reliable connection rather than a faster one that would drop every 10min.

--Patrick
Heh, living out in the boonies as I did at the time, I considered myself lucky to get a solid 28.8 connection. When it rained, it usually couldn't top 26.4.... and I knew if it connected at 14.4k I may as well disconnect and go read or something til the storm let up.

Fun fact.. I checked... and they STILL don't offer cable or dsl out there where I used to live.
 
Heh, living out in the boonies as I did at the time, I considered myself lucky to get a solid 28.8 connection. When it rained, it usually couldn't top 26.4.... and I knew if it connected at 14.4k I may as well disconnect and go read or something til the storm let up.

Fun fact.. I checked... and they STILL don't offer cable or dsl out there where I used to live.
Last mile... all hail the free market.
 
Heh, living out in the boonies as I did at the time, I considered myself lucky to get a solid 28.8 connection. When it rained, it usually couldn't top 26.4.... and I knew if it connected at 14.4k I may as well disconnect and go read or something til the storm let up.

Fun fact.. I checked... and they STILL don't offer cable or dsl out there where I used to live.
They don't offer it here, either. I use a verizon 4G mobile connection, which is actually pretty decent.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Well, it isn't a free market, and really, if you ask me it should be considered infrastructure. I know I don't sound very libertarian here, but the collusion and abuse in the content delivery industry has been such that they deserve to get smacked around and forced at pistol-point to trench more fiber into the boonies and offer channels a-la-carte.
 
Well, it isn't a free market, and really, if you ask me it should be considered infrastructure. I know I don't sound very libertarian here, but the collusion and abuse in the content delivery industry has been such that they deserve to get smacked around and forced at pistol-point to trench more fiber into the boonies and offer channels a-la-carte.
The day channels go a-la-carte is the day you see entire networks die because they can't support themselves with the money they make on package deals... and those successful networks will want an arm and a leg to watch them. I'm not interested in paying $15 bucks for a single channel like Comedy Central, Cartoon Network, or such. In fact, I'd probably stop watching TV completely and just go straight to Netflix if it ever came to that.

That said, fiber networks ARE infrastructure. They need to be treated and expanded as such.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
The day channels go a-la-carte is the day you see entire networks die because they can't support themselves with the money they make on package deals... and those successful networks will want an arm and a leg to watch them. I'm not interested in paying $15 bucks for a single channel like Comedy Central, Cartoon Network, or such. In fact, I'd probably stop watching TV completely and just go straight to Netflix if it ever came to that.
And the threat of that happening (and good old fashioned piracy) is what will keep them from doing so. Other places do a-la-carte, and so far the channelpocalypse has not happened.

That said, fiber networks ARE infrastructure. They need to be treated and expanded as such.
Definitely.
 
Top