Just because the actress will not return, it does not mean that the character is out of the show.NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Just because the actress will not return, it does not mean that the character is out of the show.NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
From that same angle?You know what would have been a fun fight to watch? Khal Drogo vs Gregor "The Mountain" Clegane.
I feel like she could go on to do comedy after Game of Thrones ends, because everything I see her doing online is hilarious.Maisie is the bomb.
The original music for the video is better, it's so much more 90s.If GOT had been filmed 30 years earlier...
Bitch needs to find out about Jon Snow's parentage... i mean the first 2 books didn't drone on and on about how much she resents him for nothing.Given that Martin will likely never finish the books we have no idea what he intended for that character.
I took LS to mean that "guest right" violations aren't just punished by customs, but magic too...LS always seemed lame to me and diminished the power of the Red Wedding.
I thought book 5 reveleadIf the leading theory holds true about that know nothing Jon Snow, it is really shitty that it was not revealed before the Red Wedding. So Kate could forgive Ned.
I thought book 5 revelead
she was just some fisherman's daughter.
What's the leading theory?
... oh fuck, that makes so much sense.Jon Snow is not actually Ned Stark's son. But the son of Lyanna Stark and Rhaegar Targaryean.
bingo.... oh fuck, that makes so much sense.
And is horrible. And has horrible implications.
!!!
That's why Melisandre was so interested in him!
Well, I got who that was about, butGo back and read book 1 with that theory firmly in mind and all of Ned's flashbacks make way more sense too.
Ooh also Jojen's "Knight of the Laughing Tree" story.
Well, I got who that was about, but
I never got the impression that Lyanna and Rhaegar would've been together before he kidnapped and raped her. Book 5 seems to tear down some of the relationships, questioning whether Catelyn ever loved Brandon, or whether Lyanna even had feelings for Robert. I know those were by unreliable characters, but up until that point those relations had been treated as unquestioned mythos.
I think the implication is she wasnt kidnapped and raped but went willingly. they were in love, despite their forced marriages. at least thats what I always thought of it. the kidnap and rape is what Robert Baratheon told himself, and maybe Ned believed it too, but thats how ive always seen it from the knight of the laughing tree story and how Ned recalls those flashbacks, and what little we know of Rhaegar.
Everything we know of Rhaegar is how popular and amazing he was, so I thought what he did to Lyanna was showing what really lived under all that. There's no way to know for certain, but if she went willingly, why did he kill her?
Well, I got who that was about, but
I never got the impression that Lyanna and Rhaegar would've been together before he kidnapped and raped her. Book 5 seems to tear down some of the relationships, questioning whether Catelyn ever loved Brandon, or whether Lyanna even had feelings for Robert. I know those were by unreliable characters, but up until that point those relations had been treated as unquestioned mythos.
In book 1 Ned thinks about whether or not Rhaegar would cheat on his wife with hookers... and decides not. Not something you'd think about your sister's rapist, that one, esp. in relation with your sisters fiancé.whether Lyanna even had feelings for Robert .... but up until that point those relations had been treated as unquestioned mythos.