http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-kass-met-0822-20140822-column.html
Where are the riots and outrage for this kid?
Where are the riots and outrage for this kid?
Just reload the page, worked for me.Mind quoting the story, I'm not paying a dollar to the Tribune.
Didn't work for me, either.Just reload the page, worked for me.
--Patrick
I have adblock.[DOUBLEPOST=1408819800,1408819735][/DOUBLEPOST]
Well of course the media doesn't care. This kid was the wrong color for the media to care. Had that been a little white boy, you bet the media would be in a frenzy over it.http://homicides.suntimes.com/2014/08/21/antonio-smith-9-killed-in-greater-grand-crossing-shooting/
Another source.
Kid essentially gets gunned down (probably gang crossfire). No riots. No one seems to give a shit if children die as long as it's not a school shooter or police doing the murdering.
Add this to your filter list, if you think you might want to read the Tribune sometime in the future.I have adblock.
Have to find out what color the shooter is first.http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-kass-met-0822-20140822-column.html
Where are the riots and outrage for this kid?
Most likely black, in which case black on black violence is media priority number 3,001 down the list of reportable news.Have to find out what color the shooter is first.
It depends on whether it is national news or local news. Local, it takes top billing every time unless the victim is white. "If it bleeds, it leads" is always the mantra of local news stations.Most likely black, in which case black on black violence is media priority number 3,001 down the list of reportable news.
*ahem*CNN Anchor Don Lemon has absolutely no idea what an Automatic Weapon is but he sure wants to talk about (read:vilify) them.
What really surprised me, is 64% saying they didn't know enough to judge. Technically, that number should be 98% or so, but you usually expect it to be about 10%."There are a lot of racist people in America, just not me or anyone I know" - NY Times Poll.
literally in the link you posted, the things attributed to "Rosie", a source confirmed that they all match up with what Wilson told investigatorsI hadn't realized he made a public statement. Link?
That is nothing like what you accuse the officer of doing."And then he said all of a sudden [Michael] just started to bum rush him. He just started coming at him full speed so [Wilson] he just started shooting and he just kept coming. So [Wilson] really thinks [Brown] was on something because he just kept coming. It was unbelievable. And then so he finally ended up, the final shot was in the forehead and then he fell about 2, 3 feet in front of the officer."
A decent side-by-side timeline of the events of the shooting from the two different perspectives:
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2014/08/us/ferguson-brown-timeline/?hpt=us_mid
Has a few pieces of information I wasn't already aware of.
Officer said:"They were walking in the middle of the street. He rolled his window down and said, 'Come on guys. Get out of the street.' They refused to and were yelling back, saying we're almost where we're going and there was some cussing involved
Seriously Dorian? "Not but a minute from your destination and would shortly be out of the street"? If you're going to lie, at least learn how to lie well. Like in the officers quote.Dorian Johnson said:The officer tells the young men either "Get the f*** on the sidewalk" or "Get the f*** out of the street," according to Johnson's accounts to CNN and other news outlets.
The young men reply that they are "not but a minute away from our destination, and we would shortly be out of the street," Johnson told CNN.
The adult was my sized, there is no way in hell a small man can yank me into a car.That one discrepancy and some other clearly flowery additions by the witnesses, this does still doesn't look great for the officer. Trying to pull the kid into the car and losing control of your gun? Somebody messed up bad here.
That's most of my feeling as well. I'm still undecided about the initial shooting until I've heard the evidence, but the police response in the days that followed indicate to me that some serious changes need to be made, and there are a lot of FPD cops who need to lose their jobs, especially higher up the chain.My big understanding with this is that forgetting about the killing, the Ferguson police have shown to be ruthless and incompetent. That makes me not inclined to trust their side of the story.
We need some RICO action up in here.That's most of my feeling as well. I'm still undecided about the initial shooting until I've heard the evidence, but the police response in the days that followed indicate to me that some serious changes need to be made, and there are a lot of FPD cops who need to lose their jobs, especially higher up the chain.
Yes amazing how a third hand account told by the friend of the shooters girlfriend shows how perfectly justified the shooter was.That is nothing like what you accuse the officer of doing.
Have any experts who have said that there is no way that Brown had his hand when he got shot? Would love to see what an actual expert has to say about Brown's wounds.There is no way in hell those wounds were made when the victim had his hands over his head.[DOUBLEPOST=1409164570,1409164538][/DOUBLEPOST]Also you have very little understanding how guns work.
hold you hands over your head, and tell me how somebody standing in front of you can shoot the front of your arms.[DOUBLEPOST=1409191660,1409191617][/DOUBLEPOST]Yes amazing how a third hand account told by the friend of the shooters girlfriend shows how perfectly justified the shooter was.
Honestly she has no more first hand knowledge of the situation than we do.
Have any experts who have said that there is no way that Brown had his hand when he got shot? Would love to see what an actual expert has to say about Brown's wounds.