And this guy sits on the board of the Crisis Pregnancy Center./headdesk /headdesk /headdesk
Idaho lawmaker asks if woman can swallow camera for gynecological exam before medical abortion
Well, technically if the camera keeps going, it WILL get to the proper orifice for a prostate exam. Not true of gyno.Sure, just like you can do the same for a prostate exam as well, ya putz!
Vine to the rescue.Already pulled due to a copyright claim by Fox etc etc.
--Patrick
Crisis pregnancy centers are places designed to trick women into thinking they're abortion clinics so they can try to talk the woman out of it. So not surprising he'd say that.And this guy sits on the board of the Crisis Pregnancy Center.
The difference between anarchists and libertarians is that libertarians acknowledge that government does indeed, however limited, have a role. Law enforcement is one of those roles. Incarceration should fall under that umbrella. Consumers can't "vote with their feet" when it comes to prisons, so the balancing action of competition and markets does not apply.Would you see that as an example of the dangers of privatization of prisons, and/or other services traditionally handled by the government?
You would be surprised. Amazing how much time some people have on their hands, but are "too busy" to help their children.Really? They came in to complain for at least an hour every week? The same parent over and over?
I saw GasBandit post about it somewhere, but can't remember where. I hope the vote sticks; greedy ass companies should've been happy with what they were getting.Nothing about the Net Neutrality vote? I just don't know who you people are anymore.
So since they're not doing their job, who'll notice the difference?I saw GasBandit post about it somewhere, but can't remember where. I hope the vote sticks; greedy ass companies should've been happy with what they were getting.
On another note, supposedly DHS is going to lose its funding in six hours so we can have a mini-repeat of October 2013's shutdown. To protest Obama's directive to let more illegal immigrants stay, they want to cut funding to the division that makes them leave.
To people who don't know what goes on in immigration, that would seem to be the case.So since they're not doing their job, who'll notice the difference?
Then there are the people who don't know what goes on in a shutdown (though last year's shutdown should have educated them).To people who don't know what goes on in immigration, that would seem to be the case.
Err, is this actually another full shutdown? I thought it was just DHS.Then there are the people who don't know what goes on in a shutdown (though last year's shutdown should have educated them).
Hint - 90% of what goes on as normal, plus a heaping helping of "we went out of our way to specially inconvenience people."
As referenced elsewhere, "shutting down" a state park means they hire MORE people to make sure nobody can use it... not that they just go home and leave it to the tender mercies of whoever wanders in.
Just the DHS.Err, is this actually another full shutdown? I thought it was just DHS.
But you're correct, this is going to cost taxpayers more than otherwise.
That'd be fine, except DHS doesn't exist in a vacuum. It has tendrils in other aspects of government.Since I find the whole DHS thing a huge pile of bullshit designed to perpetuate this ridiculous "War On Terror" TM, I'm having trouble giving two fucks.
And I think that's the case as well. Wednesday's Daily Show had the perfect opening to illustrate that.That'd be fine, except DHS doesn't exist in a vacuum. It has tendrils in other aspects of government.
I'm just noting the weird contradiction for the Republican party. At the same time, I guess it's to their benefit. 2013's cock-up was their fault, and then they did well in the 2014 mid-terms. Maybe they're hoping another stall out against Obama will win them 2016. Stamping their feet and shouting "No!" is a lot easier than taking the time to analyze where their party is going wrong to avoid putting out another Mitt Romney.
We haven't passed an actual budget in almost 10 years.I may have jumped to conclusions--apparently even Republicans in Congress don't like Boehner.
Though now Congress is passing the buck to itself from one week to the next. Eventually they're going to be proud of themselves for passing April 13th's budget on April 12th, with April 14th still up for debate.
I know, but still, saying "we good for a week" seems like a new level of pathetic.We haven't passed an actual budget in almost 10 years.
Passing the one week stop gap happened with the help of the democrats based on the agreement that the full funding bill would be voted on in the coming week. Basically it was just to get the time for an actual funding bill and prevent even a partial shutdown which I'm actually okay with since it isn't meant to be an actual funding measure.I may have jumped to conclusions--apparently even Republicans in Congress don't like Boehner.
Though now Congress is passing the buck to itself from one week to the next. Eventually they're going to be proud of themselves for passing April 13th's budget on April 12th, with April 14th still up for debate.
Because they couldn't do it now, because of all the bickering and bullshit. I'm not saying they shouldn't do a temporary movement of the deadline; it's just pathetic that it keeps coming down to the deadline.Passing the one week stop gap happened with the help of the democrats based on the agreement that the full funding bill would be voted on in the coming week. Basically it was just to get the time for an actual funding bill and prevent even a partial shutdown which I'm actually okay with since it isn't meant to be an actual funding measure.
It appears they have other priorities.it's just pathetic that it keeps coming down to the deadline.
It definately is unfortunate that they couldn't just pass a clean bill but unless Boehner goes and does something cute the clean bill will pass next week and the system worked without a shutdown.Because they couldn't do it now, because of all the bickering and bullshit. I'm not saying they shouldn't do a temporary movement of the deadline; it's just pathetic that it keeps coming down to the deadline.