Random Video Game Crap

I commented on this in the E3 thread, but I really like the look of Cuphead. It definitely feels like you're playing in an old 1930's cartoon!
 
I commented on this in the E3 thread, but I really like the look of Cuphead. It definitely feels like you're playing in an old 1930's cartoon!
The incredible thing is that it was basically made like one. The animation is hand-drawn and the backgrounds are hand-painted. About the only change from the old-school methods is they colorized characters in Photoshop.
 
The incredible thing is that it was basically made like one. The animation is hand-drawn and the backgrounds are hand-painted. About the only change from the old-school methods is they colorized characters in Photoshop.
They attempted to hand-color everything, apparently, but they said it would have taken another few years to get the game done and didn't want to hold it up even longer.
 
Also, Sephiroth's Supernova was the final push that made me actually hate the game.
They actually made this way longer in the American release. It used to just be a simple animation. Then again, they also introduced Diamond, Ruby, and Emerald Weapon in the US version... and Diamond drops a weapon that used to be dummied out. So it's not all bad.
 
They actually made this way longer in the American release. It used to just be a simple animation. Then again, they also introduced Diamond, Ruby, and Emerald Weapon in the US version... and Diamond drops a weapon that used to be dummied out. So it's not all bad.
To be fair Diamond still existed in the original as it's plot-centric, you just didn't actually get a chance to fight it.
 
A few folks have found a neat reference to Batman: the Animated Series.

Or possibly the pre-New 52 Batgirl comics with Stephanie Brown, where she had a sidekick that wore the Grey Ghost outfit and name for awhile.

I kind of wish they'd do a Grey Ghost series... make him be the guy the Bruce styled himself after when he started getting serious as a crime fighter.
 
And now I keep wanting to make a pun about working the bumpers and using the D-pad...
What? No comments about the analog stick?

I assume whoever did those is probably partial to NVIDIA (since XB1 and PS4 both also use ATI graphics).

--Patrick
 
My AMD cards have been relatively painless other than janky Nvidia technologies which barely work on their own cards.
 
It's a bit of a shame, really.
AMD's GPU design is one that was designed to be very strong at GPGPU computing, but they haven't been able to get their power consumption/heat under control, and so they have to make compromises.
Their biggest trouble is that they're fighting on two fronts, against NVIDIA for GPU and Intel for CPU. They've come up with some pretty impressive stuff, but they end up so rushed because they have to try and keep up on both ends that they're never really able to refine their stuff. And that's why Intel+NVIDIA currently rules the roost.

--Patrick
 

GasBandit

Staff member
No kidding. I'm on my second RMA. And this is XFX, which is a reasonably reputable brand, too. Supposedly.
They make the best silk purses they can out of those sow ears.[DOUBLEPOST=1435262451,1435262313][/DOUBLEPOST]
My AMD cards have been relatively painless other than janky Nvidia technologies which barely work on their own cards.
All but one of the ATI cards I've ever owned has been flaky. Even the card I own right now (which is the same model as the one giving Fade so much trouble) routinely experiences driver crashes while doing nothing at all. Just a microsecond of the screen blipping to a blue screen of death then immediately back to desktop, as if nothing ever happened, when the driver restarts. It bothered me a lot at first, but I got used to it over time I guess. But you can bet your ass the next card I buy is NVidia again. I only have ATI now because it was a gift.
 
It's a bit of a shame, really.
AMD's GPU design is one that was designed to be very strong at GPGPU computing, but they haven't been able to get their power consumption/heat under control, and so they have to make compromises.
Their biggest trouble is that they're fighting on two fronts, against NVIDIA for GPU and Intel for CPU. They've come up with some pretty impressive stuff, but they end up so rushed because they have to try and keep up on both ends that they're never really able to refine their stuff. And that's why Intel+NVIDIA currently rules the roost.

--Patrick
You'd think they ought to be able to outclass Intel on the on-board graphics side of things, at least. But even there all I hear is that Intel's latest are leaps and bounds better.
 
You'd think they ought to be able to outclass Intel on the on-board graphics side of things, at least. But even there all I hear is that Intel's latest are leaps and bounds better.
They have consistently outclassed Intel in the IGP sector, but with the latest 6xxx-series integrated GPU introduced in June, Intel has finally been able to surpass AMD's integrated GPU for gaming performance, which was one of AMD's last major strongholds.

--Patrick
 
Top