Hollywoo Stars and Celebrities: Who's sexually harassing? Who's sexually harassed? Let's find out!

figmentPez

Staff member
Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis can fuck right off.



"We didn't mean to invalidate the experience of those who were raped, we just wanted to privately tell a judge that he shouldn't believe victims because it makes us uncomfortable that someone we know might face consequences." <paraphrased>
 

Dave

Staff member
It's a really strange stance from people who champion women's rights and are so anti-human trafficking. I mean, they have spent countless hours trying to help those who were forced into sex work and are marginalized. Then they...stick up for a convicted rapist? What? Hey when my friend got caught with child porn I didn't write the judge a letter saying because he and I shared a few laughs that he shouldn't go to jail for a long time. I waved goodbye.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
Since I'm pretty sure we already knew Dane Cook was sketchy, this doesn't belong in the Milkshake Duck thread, but it's definitely a Hollywoo star being a sex pest.



If that doesn't load for you, Dane Cook (51) just married his 24 year-old girlfriend, whom he's been dating since the moment she turned 18, but they first met when she was 15. Her step dad brought her with him to Dane Cook's house, where she was presumably groomed to be ready for dating the moment she was legally an adult.
 
Since I'm pretty sure we already knew Dane Cook was sketchy, this doesn't belong in the Milkshake Duck thread, but it's definitely a Hollywoo star being a sex pest.



If that doesn't load for you, Dane Cook (51) just married his 24 year-old girlfriend, whom he's been dating since the moment she turned 18, but they first met when she was 15. Her step dad brought her with him to Dane Cook's house, where she was presumably groomed to be ready for dating the moment she was legally an adult.
Ok, I see where the confusion is, but since I speak conservative I can translate it for you.

Dane Cook isn't a groomer because he's white, cis male, and rich and influential. And it's not like he did this to a "person," he did it to a young girl, whose only purpose is to be traded off by her father to a wealthy suitor, preferably for a dowry.

See? Traditional family values.
 
Don't read the whole thing. It's awful.

Legitimately prostituting out his employee to other members to rape and use, including Brock Lesnar (and the internet detectives have figured out other unnamed executives as HHH, Bruce Prichard, etc)
 
What bullshit is this
"We have to overturn this decision because some of this evidence was of entirely separate crimes of the exact same nature that we weren't actively trying him for"
 
Yeah, looked it up in the meantime....
Good thing is, he won't be a free man because of the California case.
Bad thing is, this makes it look like it was overblown while this overturning isn't about his actual guilt at all.
 
Top