More importantly, how the fuck did this guy who OBVIOUSLY has PROBLEMS stay productive in the military for that long? I'm not denying that this single guy is a religious nut whackjob, I'm wondering how they didn't rout out the religious zealot psychiatrist before this could happen.So all the evidence that is coming out that Hasan had extremist tendencies, attended the same mosque as a couple of the 9/11 hijackers under an imam known for radicalism, that he shouted the famous "Allahu Akbar!" as he opened fire on American soldiers, that he expressed sympathy for suicide bombers, that he saw the American military as "oppressors," none of this is relevant or important in the investigation? I really wish I could live in that world; it sounds much more pleasant than reality.
More importantly, how the fuck did this guy who OBVIOUSLY has PROBLEMS stay productive in the military for that long? I'm not denying that this single guy is a religious nut whackjob, I'm wondering how they didn't rout out the religious zealot psychiatrist before this could happen.[/QUOTE]So all the evidence that is coming out that Hasan had extremist tendencies, attended the same mosque as a couple of the 9/11 hijackers under an imam known for radicalism, that he shouted the famous "Allahu Akbar!" as he opened fire on American soldiers, that he expressed sympathy for suicide bombers, that he saw the American military as "oppressors," none of this is relevant or important in the investigation? I really wish I could live in that world; it sounds much more pleasant than reality.
I'm dubious of anything called "evidence" that's not coming directly out of Ft. Hood. If Glenn Beck has taught us anything, it's that you can link everything to everything if you don't let reality get in the way. I'd prefer the investigation be done by law enforcement and the Army, and not the wingnut press of either side.So all the evidence that is coming out that Hasan had extremist tendencies, attended the same mosque as a couple of the 9/11 hijackers under an imam known for radicalism, that he shouted the famous "Allahu Akbar!" as he opened fire on American soldiers, that he expressed sympathy for suicide bombers, that he saw the American military as "oppressors," none of this is relevant or important in the investigation? I really wish I could live in that world; it sounds much more pleasant than reality.Let the Ft. Hood witch hunts begin. All this anti-Muslim grandstanding is going to do nothing productive.
More importantly, how the fuck did this guy who OBVIOUSLY has PROBLEMS stay productive in the military for that long? I'm not denying that this single guy is a religious nut whackjob, I'm wondering how they didn't rout out the religious zealot psychiatrist before this could happen.[/QUOTE]So all the evidence that is coming out that Hasan had extremist tendencies, attended the same mosque as a couple of the 9/11 hijackers under an imam known for radicalism, that he shouted the famous \"Allahu Akbar!\" as he opened fire on American soldiers, that he expressed sympathy for suicide bombers, that he saw the American military as \"oppressors,\" none of this is relevant or important in the investigation? I really wish I could live in that world; it sounds much more pleasant than reality.
When you're a Jet you're a Jet all the way...We're kind of a clique that way.
Oh god, you're a fan of the Minnesota Shit-Pukes aren't you.
Most repulsive sweaters in sports.
Stay out of this, Cindy-lover. This is between me and the Whalers fan.Oh dear, have I caused a rift?
But apparently, "community organizing" is?Bill and Ted and... Sarah? Fancy pageant walkin' is not a qualifier to be President.
This is possibly the worst written article I've seen in a long time. It shows an amazingly poor understanding on health information, how it saves money, and how having conditions that must be met ensure patient safety and the security of patient information.Gasbandit said:This article pretty much sums is up: government force is at the heart of Obamacare.
It's actually closer to "Do I want someone who I KNOW doesn't have my best interests at heart to decide what kind of coverage I get, or do I want to trust it to someone who might fuck it up?" One is a known negative, the other is only a potential negative. I'd sooner take the potential.This whole healthcare debate comes down to one thing: do you trust the government to determine what is best for your life? The answer should be obvious, folks.
I think they are closer to it than a company that has a personal stake (protecting their profit margin) in denying me coverage. The government has a stake in keeping me healthy, as a healthy society is more able to produce. I'm simply unsure of their ability to pull it off.@ash So you think the government has your best interest at heart but might screw it up?
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/QUOTE]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/QUOTE]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/QUOTE]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/QUOTE]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/quote]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/quote]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/quote]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
When Obama went to denmark, it was not to commemorate a great blow for freedom. It was to smile and schmooze and execute a charm offensive in an insulting and vulgar attempt to sway the IOC so he could put a feather in his cap and say "Look, I brought the olympics to MY TOWN. Because I'm so popular." There was countless media coverage on what he was doing, what his wife was doing, and the utter transparency of the whole affair made it a revolting display. It was all about Obama. It was him being the campaign rock star again. But, it seems the IOC was immune to Hopenosis (pity more Americans weren't).But please, educate me. Explain what is so obvious to you. I can't wait to hear this one.
When Obama went to denmark, it was not to commemorate a great blow for freedom. It was to smile and schmooze and execute a charm offensive in an insulting and vulgar attempt to sway the IOC so he could put a feather in his cap and say "Look, I brought the olympics to MY TOWN. Because I'm so popular." There was countless media coverage on what he was doing, what his wife was doing, and the utter transparency of the whole affair made it a revolting display. It was all about Obama. It was him being the campaign rock star again. But, it seems the IOC was immune to Hopenosis (pity more Americans weren't).But please, educate me. Explain what is so obvious to you. I can't wait to hear this one.
When Obama went to denmark, it was not to commemorate a great blow for freedom. It was to smile and schmooze and execute a charm offensive in an insulting and vulgar attempt to sway the IOC so he could put a feather in his cap and say "Look, I brought the olympics to MY TOWN. Because I'm so popular." There was countless media coverage on what he was doing, what his wife was doing, and the utter transparency of the whole affair made it a revolting display. It was all about Obama. It was him being the campaign rock star again. But, it seems the IOC was immune to Hopenosis (pity more Americans weren't).But please, educate me. Explain what is so obvious to you. I can't wait to hear this one.
There was one world leader absent for today’s commemorations marking the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Surprisingly enough, it’s President Barack Obama, who found time last year to give a campaign speech there last year, which Der Spiegel summed up as “People of the World, Look at Me”.
The White House has cited a packed schedule, though looking at it he had nothing much on yesterday (brief chat to reporters about healthcare – by far his biggest priority) and just blah briefings and a bill signing today until a metting this evening with Benjamin Netanyahu. This time, Der Spiegel has reported it as “Barack Too Busy”.
But Obama is, of course, making time to trot over to Norway to receive the Nobel Peace Prize in December. Didn’t seem to have too much of a problem clearing the diary for that – though his acceptance of the prize and decision to give a another soaring, historical, epoch-marking etc etc speech there will be looked back on as a colossal political mistake and sign of hubris.
Perhaps Obama felt that celebrating the role of the United States in bringing down the wall would be a bit triumphalist and not quite in keeping with his wish to present America as a declining world power anxious to apologise for sundry historic misdeeds. Maybe he didn’t really want to be associated with that warmonger Ronald Reagan.
Marty Peretz is gloomy about what his non-appearance says about Obama’s world view and his approach on Iran. Newt Gingrich calls the failure to go to Berlin “a tragedy”. Paul Rahe at Powerline wonders if Obama is signalling his administration’s intent to enact a “process of turning its back on our erstwhile allies in Europe”. Certainly, he seems to have a prickly relationship with Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Whatever the reasons, it’s another revealing mistake by Obama. This deserved to be marked by more than just a proclamation penned by a staffer.
Sure he didn't go, but at least we'll have the 2016 Olympics in Chicago...[/quote]Foreign papers say that Obama did not attend the Berlin Wall ceremonies because they were not centered around him.
In a world of terrorist fist jabs, mission accomplished, hair cut costs, cackling laughs, and various other filler stories, nothing is common sense.No, I think it's just common sense that the President going to this particular event would be very unlikely to draw fire from the other side. I understand you don't want to criticize him for this, he's your guy, but you can damn well bet that if Bush had done this he'd get the same treatment from me and far worse from the press and rightly so.