I
Iaculus
Still better than Kidz Bop.ITT: The Beatles weren't flawless musicians and performers.
Still better than Kidz Bop.ITT: The Beatles weren't flawless musicians and performers.
At every dramatic moment in a song.Bah, Chaz will never be as pretty or as talented as you. Do you also beat your chest dramatically?
Christmas time is here againI've actually heard much, much worse covers, unfortunately.
It gets worse-That's one example right there, yes.
I think he's saying that only gay dudes like Celine Dion. Or something.
what does this mean[/QUOTE]cough*homo*cough
I...oh my God, I think that is singly the best reply to one of my posts ever. I...I think I love you. But I meant Chicago as in the musical, not the progressive 80's rock band with the one hit from Karate Kid.If you don't need it don't ask for it closet bisexual on the downlow for chocolate rain man. Charlie you know exactly what he means don't act so shocked..
Am i the only person ever that doesn't like the beatles? I don't think they suck or anything, I just... don't get into them. They don't make me want to get up and shake my booty, they don't make me want to sing along... they just... are.
p.s. your chicago cd is next to the foreigner vinyl in your attic. It didn't burn with the Boston, Nazereth, Skid Row, Kansas, Alabama, Europe, Asia, New york dolls, Manhattan transfer... linkin park...
I...oh my God, I think that is singly the best reply to one of my posts ever. I...I think I love you. But I meant Chicago as in the musical, not the progressive 80's rock band with the one hit from Karate Kid.[/QUOTE]Actually Chicago had many hits, like "You are my inspiration" and that "Hard to say Im sorry", and Karate Kid 1's Something Esposito is a multiple grammy winner.If you don't need it don't ask for it closet bisexual on the downlow for chocolate rain man. Charlie you know exactly what he means don't act so shocked..
Am i the only person ever that doesn't like the beatles? I don't think they suck or anything, I just... don't get into them. They don't make me want to get up and shake my booty, they don't make me want to sing along... they just... are.
p.s. your chicago cd is next to the foreigner vinyl in your attic. It didn't burn with the Boston, Nazereth, Skid Row, Kansas, Alabama, Europe, Asia, New york dolls, Manhattan transfer... linkin park...
If I was to add on to that - as I apparently am - I'd like to point out that the fame the Beatles had is very much like the fame that The New Kids on the Block had.I dont mind the Beatles and yes they were a great band, but I do think they are overated to the level where many great bands will never touch their fame.
If I was to add on to that - as I apparently am - I'd like to point out that the fame the Beatles had is very much like the fame that The New Kids on the Block had.I dont mind the Beatles and yes they were a great band, but I do think they are overated to the level where many great bands will never touch their fame.
Guess it's good he mostly played bass, then.Gruebeard said:That Paul McCartney could match Jimmy Page or Eric Clapton on guitar?
Nah I'll focus on this. See, here is where you compared them. That's what I addressed in my post.You really think that Lennon was a singer with a skill and range even approaching Celine Dion?
No, your point about them becoming popular just because they were popular like, according to you, Angelina Jolie did, is quite destroyed with my point about their fame longevity.Awesome. Calleja's come in on my side. You've expanded on my original point quite well. Thanks.
I was saying the same thing, only in more specific terms: The Beatles, while not the best musicians, wrote songs well, songs that are ripe to be covered by other musicians.Since when is the ability to sing the deciding factor on whether a band is awesome or not?
Can you name a better song writing, team or solo, enterprise than Lennon/McCartney?