It's almost as if the Beatles were doing the cover versions.I feel sorry for the Beatles. Everything they did Joe Cocker did better.
That's pretty much my beef too. I grew up listening to real bands--sure, also Raffi and kiddy stuff like that--but mostly bands and singers that my parents listened to. I guess one of the problems is that some songs aren't appropriate for kids and have to be edited a little. While my sister and I thought it was hilarious that my niece knows all the words to Mason Jennings' "Your New Man" ("woah-woah woah woah woah woah, Right now he's a prob'ly moanin' your name..."), others might not think so.That's fine, I'm not against covers themselves. A good cover, by a good artist can add great things to a song. I personally love Jimi Hendrick's version of "All Along the Watchtower" a lot more than Bob Dylan's version. I was asking why a parent would rather let their kids listen to the watered-down Kidz Bop version of a song, something that is not a good cover, instead of introducing them to the original artists.
cough*homo*coughBut why does it matter if they listen to the original or not? It's not as though the Beatles were really stellar musicians and vocalists. I'd be on your side if we were talking about covers of Celine Dion, as there's simply no way to match her skill and that's what she's all about. But we don't listen to the Beatles because they nailed the performances with impeccable skill (that's laughable); it's good for a whole other set of reasons, and those reasons let anyone cover them and be interesting.
There are plenty of Beatles songs that have been done better than the Beatles did them. And I don't just mean quality-wise: The connection between listener and song can be improved by a cover. These songs may very well fit that category.
what does this mean[/QUOTE]cough*homo*cough
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I thought it was funny. I'm not surprised they did it either.What made me sad was DEVO 2.0 an anesthetic version of the Original DEVO songs for kids. They had the full cooperation of the original band.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devo_2.0
what does this mean[/QUOTE]cough*homo*cough
what does this mean[/QUOTE]cough*homo*cough
what does this mean[/QUOTE]cough*homo*cough
Still better than Kidz Bop.ITT: The Beatles weren't flawless musicians and performers.
At every dramatic moment in a song.Bah, Chaz will never be as pretty or as talented as you. Do you also beat your chest dramatically?
Christmas time is here againI've actually heard much, much worse covers, unfortunately.
It gets worse-That's one example right there, yes.
I think he's saying that only gay dudes like Celine Dion. Or something.
what does this mean[/QUOTE]cough*homo*cough
I...oh my God, I think that is singly the best reply to one of my posts ever. I...I think I love you. But I meant Chicago as in the musical, not the progressive 80's rock band with the one hit from Karate Kid.If you don't need it don't ask for it closet bisexual on the downlow for chocolate rain man. Charlie you know exactly what he means don't act so shocked..
Am i the only person ever that doesn't like the beatles? I don't think they suck or anything, I just... don't get into them. They don't make me want to get up and shake my booty, they don't make me want to sing along... they just... are.
p.s. your chicago cd is next to the foreigner vinyl in your attic. It didn't burn with the Boston, Nazereth, Skid Row, Kansas, Alabama, Europe, Asia, New york dolls, Manhattan transfer... linkin park...
I...oh my God, I think that is singly the best reply to one of my posts ever. I...I think I love you. But I meant Chicago as in the musical, not the progressive 80's rock band with the one hit from Karate Kid.[/QUOTE]Actually Chicago had many hits, like "You are my inspiration" and that "Hard to say Im sorry", and Karate Kid 1's Something Esposito is a multiple grammy winner.If you don't need it don't ask for it closet bisexual on the downlow for chocolate rain man. Charlie you know exactly what he means don't act so shocked..
Am i the only person ever that doesn't like the beatles? I don't think they suck or anything, I just... don't get into them. They don't make me want to get up and shake my booty, they don't make me want to sing along... they just... are.
p.s. your chicago cd is next to the foreigner vinyl in your attic. It didn't burn with the Boston, Nazereth, Skid Row, Kansas, Alabama, Europe, Asia, New york dolls, Manhattan transfer... linkin park...
If I was to add on to that - as I apparently am - I'd like to point out that the fame the Beatles had is very much like the fame that The New Kids on the Block had.I dont mind the Beatles and yes they were a great band, but I do think they are overated to the level where many great bands will never touch their fame.
If I was to add on to that - as I apparently am - I'd like to point out that the fame the Beatles had is very much like the fame that The New Kids on the Block had.I dont mind the Beatles and yes they were a great band, but I do think they are overated to the level where many great bands will never touch their fame.
Guess it's good he mostly played bass, then.Gruebeard said:That Paul McCartney could match Jimmy Page or Eric Clapton on guitar?
Nah I'll focus on this. See, here is where you compared them. That's what I addressed in my post.You really think that Lennon was a singer with a skill and range even approaching Celine Dion?
No, your point about them becoming popular just because they were popular like, according to you, Angelina Jolie did, is quite destroyed with my point about their fame longevity.Awesome. Calleja's come in on my side. You've expanded on my original point quite well. Thanks.
I was saying the same thing, only in more specific terms: The Beatles, while not the best musicians, wrote songs well, songs that are ripe to be covered by other musicians.Since when is the ability to sing the deciding factor on whether a band is awesome or not?
Can you name a better song writing, team or solo, enterprise than Lennon/McCartney?
you do realize they're famous worldwide and not just in the US, right?The Beatles were very popular with the Baby Boom generation. People have often complained that the Baby Boomers seem to impose their chosen culture and philosophy from their youth on every other part of culture. That could be why the Beatles remain so popular simply because the generation that truly loved them has so much pull.
you do realize they're famous worldwide and not just in the US, right?[/QUOTE]The Beatles were very popular with the Baby Boom generation. People have often complained that the Baby Boomers seem to impose their chosen culture and philosophy from their youth on every other part of culture. That could be why the Beatles remain so popular simply because the generation that truly loved them has so much pull.
Yes, that is pretty much what I am saying and I stand by that statement. if the US didn't celebrate the Beatles at the level they do they would not be nearly as popular. I am not saying they would have disappeared off the map or anything but it would be a drastic difference in popularity....are you truly saying that the only reason the Beatles still have worldwide fame is because the US happens to like them?
That's nice. Still not what I was addressing earlier, but nice I guess.Gruebeard said:EDIT FOR CHIPPY: Celine came up, by the way, because I suggested it was perhaps pointless to cover her songs seeing as what mostly makes her songs worth listening to is her skill in singing them.
I can't imagine the world isn't heavily influenced by American tastes. We all consume so much of their culture every day. If it falls off the American radar, I can't see how it won't fall off most everyone else's radar, too.
Quit being obnoxious. I know that the rest of the world has their own pop culture and interests stop acting like I don't. But I stand by the Beatles popularity being a product of the American 1960's Baby Boomer obsession.For you.
The rest of the world has no problem listening to stuff the US has never heard of. We have popularity charts of our own and everything. Wow, can you imagine that?
Quit being obnoxious. I know that the rest of the world has their own pop culture and interests stop acting like I don't. But I stand by the Beatles popularity being a product of the American 1960's Baby Boomer obsession.[/QUOTE]For you.
The rest of the world has no problem listening to stuff the US has never heard of. We have popularity charts of our own and everything. Wow, can you imagine that?
Being famous in the US generally means being known worldwide.You'd know who Celine Dion is if she wasn't famous in the States?
dawwwww :blush:*thinks Gruebeard is "super rad"*
If I were a Ringo guy, I'd like our argument to be under the sea.Now, a Ringo man I'd argue with.
Same here.Yeah, George Harrison's always been my favorite. Love his solo stuff.
:wtf:I'm totally with makare on this one. America had rock, the Beatles came over, the Beatles became the next step in rock. Babyboomers continued to push that shit worldwide.
If the majority of their songs is not in English, it would rarely ever be big in the US.Dude, they sold out one of the biggest stadiums in the world, El Estadio Azteca, something like 16 times. Not even U2 did that.
But I'm sure that's all thanks to the fame they had in the US, right? :lol:
If the majority of their songs is not in English, it would rarely ever be big in the US.Dude, they sold out one of the biggest stadiums in the world, El Estadio Azteca, something like 16 times. Not even U2 did that.
But I'm sure that's all thanks to the fame they had in the US, right? :lol:
If the majority of their songs is not in English, it would rarely ever be big in the US.Dude, they sold out one of the biggest stadiums in the world, El Estadio Azteca, something like 16 times. Not even U2 did that.
But I'm sure that's all thanks to the fame they had in the US, right? :lol:
I'm surprised I haven't tagged the thread with that yet.The Beatles suck.
More like can't. I thought the Disney Channel was where good actors went to die.Not to mention the fact that all teenage Disney stars are triple threats; they can sing, dance, and act.
??"MOON PEOPLE!".. no wait.. "BABY BOOMERS!"
KABOOSH!
Like Celine Dion and the Barenaked Ladies. (which is the Vegas show I'd want to see)There's plenty of awesome things that have come from overseas that have made an important splash here that's worth the while.
Sometimes war![/QUOTE]We all live in AmerikaaaaaaaaI love pop culture. heh
"Coca-Cola, Wonderbra"
I don't think anyone would deny America's influence on pop culture.because there is an international butthurt button when you talk America's influence on pop culture.
I don't think anyone would deny America's influence on pop culture.because there is an international butthurt button when you talk America's influence on pop culture.
...No, dude. Not at all. I never said that. I continually reminded you guys I wasn't saying that. Ever, ever, ever, ever, ever. All I said, and continue to say, is relatively, one of America's hugest exports is pop culture. And it gets pushed around the world. It doesn't belittle any other country in any other way, nor does it say that you guys will never have any celebrities or pop culture worth knowing. In FACT, I envy the sort of non-homogenous pop culture non-Americans get from a variety of different influences.He thinks that without the US the world would have like 5 famous people. (yes, I'm being hyperbolic)
Well, if we're going to go to the roots of stuff then I'll say right now that M&Ms and Snickers and EVERYTHING chocolatey is Mexican, cause this is were cacao came from.Remember to discount anyone famous for playing Rock-n-Roll. An American Institution ripped from the Blues.
The Beatles even took their name and part of their early sound from Buddy Holly. That is Global Influence.I'm not butt hurt at all!
We've stated and agreed that the Baby Boomers are an American-only phenomena, we also have, now, agreed that the world doesn't need the US to have pop icons.
Ergo... why are you still arguing that The Beatles are what they are worldwide thanks to the american-only baby boomers? That's the jist of it. We can say that they (Beatles) are what they IN the US thanks to the baby boomers, fair enough.... but not worldwide. That's what both you and makare were arguing.
Well, if we're going to go to the roots of stuff then I'll say right now that M&Ms and Snickers and EVERYTHING chocolatey is Mexican, cause this is were cacao came from.Remember to discount anyone famous for playing Rock-n-Roll. An American Institution ripped from the Blues.
No, no, scratch that. Everything is African, cause that's where the Human Race comes from. There, settled.
Heh. At any given point in time our national top40 music chart consists of 50% non-American based artists. Half of those don't even sing in English and will never ever be heard in the US. They are still big artists nonetheless.[/QUOTE]He thinks that without the US the world would have like 5 famous people. (yes, I'm being hyperbolic)
May I quote myself?Being famous in the US generally means being known worldwide.
Not being known in the US means not being known in the US.
That's exactly my point:Confused by the last line.. lolBeing famous in the US generally means being known worldwide.
Not being known in the US means not being known in the US.
Not being known in <x> means not being known in <x>.
Well, duh? x = x
You said the same thing twice.
I guess Abba could work. They are at about the same level as The Beatles, pop bands that made it huge.
I would rather have something that was not popular in the US at all but still popular elsewhere.
Actually, everything is from Space because that's where all the dust that clumped togetherto create the Earth came from.
"The cosmos is also within us, we're made of star stuff. And we are a way, for the cosmos, to know itself." - Carl Sagan.....you know, come to think of it, 99% of the world's problems would be solved overnight if people actually thought like that, that we're all really, in the end, the same clump of space-stuff
And we can't be friends any more..."blaizah blaizah! dragostea din tea!"
I wanted to hate that song.. I really wanted to.... but I couldn't help myself. I love it. <3
And we can't be friends any more...[/QUOTE]"blaizah blaizah! dragostea din tea!"
I wanted to hate that song.. I really wanted to.... but I couldn't help myself. I love it. <3
*moby*[/QUOTE]Actually, everything is from Space because that's where all the dust that clumped togetherto create the Earth came from.
"The cosmos is also within us, we're made of star stuff. And we are a way, for the cosmos, to know itself." - Carl Sagan.....you know, come to think of it, 99% of the world's problems would be solved overnight if people actually thought like that, that we're all really, in the end, the same clump of space-stuff
"make me a list" lolYou guys aren't getting the point, and are seemingly stuck on some "I don't get it because I'm an American" tirade.
Therefore, international friends, make me a list of things that are considered internationally known pop culture items which are not American pop-culturally produced. You started with football, now continue. Impress me.
And, since apparently even pop culture icons like "Oprah Winfrey" don't count, it has to be big enough and international enough. The same standards apply, boyos.
And, since the biggest thing everyone is gonna throw against me is "Well you're American so you wouldn't understand", international friends, please be honest about your selections and please honestly tell other people their ideas aren't.
And also, once again, I'm not saying that producing the most entertainment is exactly a merit badge, nor am I saying that all other international stuff is without merit.
Pick any major Bollywood artist, and you got an artist that has billions of followers and is not known in the US but in many other countries. I just suck at naming them.I guess Abba could work. They are at about the same level as The Beatles, pop bands that made it huge.
I would rather have something that was not popular in the US at all but still popular elsewhere.
?Don't get so worked up and personally invested.
Oh, was that what he wanted? Yeah I could make a huge list, but still don't see the point.[/QUOTE]Amen on that.every single international poster in the forum could make a list of famous pop icons that the US has never heard about.
Yeah, fuck Akira Korusawa and every other movie director copying him, Beatles and every other band copying their 4-man style and of course Asian and Indians dont watch their own movies.He thinks that without the US the world would have like 5 famous people. (yes, I'm being hyperbolic)
As soon as JCM gets in on his WARGLEBARGLEBARGLEBARGLE, it's just a matter of sitting back and enjoying. And every once in a while saying something to throw him into another shitfit.Yay just in time for the What the fuck is JCM even talking about now show
I love this show.
Pity you had the British sell it to you, and the Chinese lend you money so that your industry could survive to buy it from them.[America is in fact the only culture that matters. We gave you trogdolytes jeans and rock n roll. SUCK IT
As soon as JCM gets in on his WARGLEBARGLEBARGLEBARGLE, it's just a matter of sitting back and enjoying. And every once in a while saying something to throw him into another shitfit.Yay just in time for the What the fuck is JCM even talking about now show
I love this show.
What?Weak as you running away from replying Ama's post and running between Juski's usual ad-himineming all international users and uneducated shit?
I could repeat it in a few other langauges, but seeing you cant even make it beyond English, its as they said before, a waste of time.Weak as you running away from replying Ama's post and running between Juski's usual ad-himineming all international users and uneducated shit?
Pathetically I could take any movie/music industry, toss off a few name name, like Japanese directors-
Akira Kurosawa
Takashi Miike
Yasujiro Ozu
Hiroshi Teshigahar
Isao Takahata
They have been copied, had americanized versions of their stuff remade, angles and stories copied but people at your level of education, language and travel wouldnt know anything about it.
Maybe thats why ElJuski and you, after getting to the level of insulting all international users are now trying to bring this to a flame war, to avoid the fact that even if we spent all day telling you about the world, you wont know shit.
Requesting a mod lock, as I dont have time for this shit.
I wouldn't bet on that, after all there are more chinese then the rest of us.I bet you more people worldwide know who Miley Cyrus is than any huge Asian pop star.
I think it has more to do with the US actually promoting it world wide, and having more experience at it.But US pop culture is pretty homogenized, and therefore, more likely to be seen world over.
.........What?neither JCM nor Gas are posting here, stop trying to make it seem they are.
And confusion explained. It just seemed to me you were after my weak comment.Frankie - Not talking to you mate, just laughing of Juski and Makare. My apologies if you thought it was directed at you.
I wouldn't bet on that, after all there are more chinese then the rest of us.I bet you more people worldwide know who Miley Cyrus is than any huge Asian pop star.
I think it has more to do with the US actually promoting it world wide, and having more experience at it. [/QUOTE]Pretty much this.But US pop culture is pretty homogenized, and therefore, more likely to be seen world over.
That's right it's not an " inst an ad-hominem in Britneylandia". You can claim whatever you want but you have still not shown any evidence that the Beatles would have been as big without the US. And you haven't because they wouldnt have been and everyone knows it.Frankie - Not talking to you mate, just laughing of Juski and Makare. My apologies if you thought it was directed at you.
Makare - Guess whining about international butthurt because you two didnt move far enough from the basement to see that billions dont listen/watch/wear your stuff (which isnt even your culture, but borrowed mostly from Britain) inst an ad-hominem in Britneylandia?
.........What?neither JCM nor Gas are posting here, stop trying to make it seem they are.
Just you wait until he gets that Sliders remote working, then he'll be proving all kinds of shit.That's right it's not an " inst an ad-hominem in Britneylandia". You can claim whatever you want but you have still not shown any evidence that the Beatles would have been as big without the US.
That's right it's not an " inst an ad-hominem in Britneylandia". You can claim whatever you want but you have still not shown any evidence that the USA made the Beatles, who already sold millions throught the world BEFORE coming to america. You cant because Im too busy ad-homening.Frankie - Not talking to you mate, just laughing of Juski and Makare. My apologies if you thought it was directed at you.
Makare - Guess whining about international butthurt because you two didnt move far enough from the basement to see that billions dont listen/watch/wear your stuff (which isnt even your culture, but borrowed mostly from Britain) inst an ad-hominem in Britneylandia?
Requesting again a mod lock, as I dont have time for this shit.Weak as running away from replying Ama's post and running between Juski's usual ad-himineming all international users and uneducated shit?
Pathetically I could take any movie/music industry, toss off a few name name, like Japanese directors-
Akira Kurosawa
Takashi Miike
Yasujiro Ozu
Hiroshi Teshigahar
Isao Takahata
They have been copied, had americanized versions of their stuff remade, angles and stories copied but people at your level of education, language and travel wouldnt know anything about it.
Maybe thats why ElJuski and you, after getting to the level of insulting all international users are now trying to bring this to a flame war, to avoid the fact that even if we spent all day telling you about the world, you wont know shit.
I could repeat it in a few other langauges, but seeing you cant even make it beyond English, its as they said before, a waste of time.
OH HELL NO. You came in here and raised the decibel level way up so YOU can clean up your mess. Plus, what else would I do for my afternoon entertainment?Requesting again a mod lock, as I dont have time for this shit.
Problem is, (wiki) By October 1972, the Beatles’ worldwide sales total stood at 545 million units. To date The Beatles record sales are over 1 billion units worldwide.Meh, you does one prove a band would have sold as much without selling in one of their bigger markets?!
What does that have to do with the Beatles?Oh for crying out loud... ANIME... the US barely heard of it (watching some cut up version and shit) while Europe and South America where watching Candy Candy and Sandybell...
/end thread
What does that have to do with the Beatles?Oh for crying out loud... ANIME... the US barely heard of it (watching some cut up version and shit) while Europe and South America where watching Candy Candy and Sandybell...
/end thread
Again, opinions, no facts.If you can somehow disconnect the Beatles from the US, if you can claim that there would Beatles Rockband, Beatles Kidz Bop, the cover bands, the impersonators, the tshirts, the 20th releases of the same album, endless documentaries, exposes and biographies, and everything else- without the baby boomers.. then go ahead magic man.
So we blame all the crappy stuff on the US?! Done...If you can somehow disconnect the Beatles from the US, if you can claim that there would Beatles Rockband, Beatles Kidz Bop, the cover bands, the impersonators, the tshirts, the 20th releases of the same album, endless documentaries, exposes and biographies, and everything else- without the baby boomers.. then go ahead magic man.
Nothing, i was talking about the stuff that started all this...What does that have to do with the Beatles?
So we blame all the crappy stuff on the US?! Done... [/QUOTE]Hey, Britain invented the boyband.If you can somehow disconnect the Beatles from the US, if you can claim that there would Beatles Rockband, Beatles Kidz Bop, the cover bands, the impersonators, the tshirts, the 20th releases of the same album, endless documentaries, exposes and biographies, and everything else- without the baby boomers.. then go ahead magic man.
While I think this helps the whole argument, I refuse to let anime win anything.Oh for crying out loud... ANIME... the US barely heard of it (watching some cut up version and shit) while Europe and South America where watching Candy Candy and Sandybell...
/end thread
Buy GM instead, please. Specifically the Chevy Equinox or GMC Terrain.FUCK THE WORLD!!!!US 0WNS THE WORLD SUCKS!!!! BUY FORD!!!!
Corrected that for you-I am as uneducated as ever.
*avoids posting any facts, just repeats the same stuff that was refuted 3 pages ago*
JCM said:Beatlemania started BEFORE USA. Boyzone, Westlife, Spice Girls all got huge rapidly just like the Beatles.
What saved them was that they accepted British contract terms, otherwise they'd be stuck making films up to overdose like Elvis, or forced to cut back on experimentation like Hendrix to again, overdose.
USA helped, but the Beatles could have made it huge without the US, and were already huge. Now their american label was created for brazilian music, the band had millions sold BEFORE coming to the US, sold out concerts in Eurpor and hits in Latin America and Europe, and still I see an arguement for "America fuck yeah!" and calling of Calleja's and Ama's opinion as "international butthurt".
Can I get any facts from you, instead of BS? I'll even toss you a bone, it was the brazilian music label in the US that later gave them a movie for free if they would sign with them.
While I think this helps the whole argument, I refuse to let anime win anything.Oh for crying out loud... ANIME... the US barely heard of it (watching some cut up version and shit) while Europe and South America where watching Candy Candy and Sandybell...
/end thread
Correcetd that for you, my redneck clown.I am as uneducated as ever.
Sorry about that, anyway Ive scaled back my posts to the allowed El-Juski level of "Butthurt! Pathetic! Hilarious!" vocabulary. Back on Topic-It's a good thing everyone knows that the best way to respond to an ad-hominem is with another...
Seriously. Let's keep the thread civil. Consider that a formal warning.redneck clown
retard
untraveled clown
anyway Ive scaled back my posts to the allowed El-Juski level of "Butthurt! Pathetic! Hilarious!" vocabulary.
Bingo.The Beatles aren't even on top of the list for best selling albums.
Again, I could name the biggest Bollywood star ever, but you could only take my word for it how much of a cultural icon he is on countless countries. Bigger than the Beatles (they go "who?"), but it's a still a tough thing to try and prove to someone who never heard of him!
"No really, see? He's on mugs, placemats, pens, they have action figures, etc.."
- "Big whoop, so has Dora the Explorer."
"/facepalm"
No. That was a formal warning for you to watch the name calling. If someone else is doing similar things feel free to report the post like people did yours and I will warn them as well.Espy- Across all the thread and users, okay.
explanation for how American record labels led to overdose requestedotherwise they'd be stuck making films up to overdose like Elvis, or forced to cut back on experimentation like Hendrix to again, overdose.
Bingo.The Beatles aren't even on top of the list for best selling albums.
Again, I could name the biggest Bollywood star ever, but you could only take my word for it how much of a cultural icon he is on countless countries. Bigger than the Beatles (they go "who?"), but it's a still a tough thing to try and prove to someone who never heard of him!
"No really, see? He's on mugs, placemats, pens, they have action figures, etc.."
- "Big whoop, so has Dora the Explorer."
"/facepalm"
Espy-I did. I got no reply, but anyway, okay.
explanation for how record labels led to overdose requested[/QUOTE]Elvis was talked into a contract which got him stuck making movies while he watched the Beatles revinvent themselves and try new stuff. Hendrix branched out and started playing Jazz and heavy blues, with some long jam sessions. Record company said No and contract again made sure that he would make the same kind of music.otherwise they'd be stuck making films up to overdose like Elvis, or forced to cut back on experimentation like Hendrix to again, overdose.
I responded to you lightheartedly instead of telling you to not waste our time reporting posts that really showed YOU insulting people after you egged them on. I gave you a chance and you just can't drop it. Fine, you get your wish. LOCKEDNow thats confusing, asking for entertainment, and when one responds to insults.... anyway, for the third time, okay.