PVP Online: New Jade Design

[Silver Jelly]

hey, this has happenned to me both drawing boobs and writing about them! And I'm not a pervert or anyth... oh, wait.

 

[GasBandit]

well, this calls for meticulous testing.

Boobs. Boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs... boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs... boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs boobs.. hey, I think I'm starting to feel something...

 

[Fun Size]

Is...is it boobs?

 

[LittleSin]

I've gotten a girl boner drawing pretty boys before.

Mmmmmm...pretty boys.

 

[GasBandit]

I've gotten a girl boner drawing pretty boys before.

Mmmmmm...pretty boys.

 

[North_Ranger]

The idea of wanting to...what's the word...schtoink a comic character is a bit disturbing to me.

I like Jade's expression in the most recent comic

Soooo... It's disturbing to feel a little aroused by a drawing of a sexy woman?

Also, people who say they'd schtoink Minnie Mouse or something... THOSE guys are disturbing.

 

[KCWM]

The idea of wanting to...what's the word...schtoink a comic character is a bit disturbing to me.

I like Jade's expression in the most recent comic

Soooo... It's disturbing to feel a little aroused by a drawing of a sexy woman?

Also, people who say they'd schtoink Minnie Mouse or something... THOSE guys are disturbing.[/QUOTE]

There's a pretty big difference between being aroused and wanting to schtoink. Being aroused by Jade? Maybe Frank Cho's version of Jade...but even then, I wasn't anywhere close to the mindset of "I'll be in my bunk".

And you're right about the Minnie Mouse thing...that is far more disturbing to me.

 

[Telephius]

In Gusto's defense, he was painting boobs.

On his junk.

Its all the stroking...brush stroking.

 

[GasBandit]

Do you dare?

Rule34.paheal presents...
minnie_mouse

DO YOU DARE?

(Not even remotely safe for work. Not safe for childhood. Not safe for sanity. Not safe for lunch, at the very least)

 

[Silver Jelly]

Do you dare?

Rule34.paheal presents...
minnie_mouse

DO YOU DARE?

(Not even remotely safe for work. Not safe for childhood. Not safe for sanity. Not safe for lunch, at the very least)

I dared.

WTF

 

[KCWM]

Do you dare?

Rule34.paheal presents...
minnie_mouse

DO YOU DARE?

(Not even remotely safe for work. Not safe for childhood. Not safe for sanity. Not safe for lunch, at the very least)

I dared.

WTF[/QUOTE]

Your avatar is fitting for this response

 

[Silver Jelly]

^ My point exactly. Most of it looks like it's drawn by 8 year olds.

There was one that was pure comedy though. The first one (if I'm not mistaken, I'm not interested in browsing that mage again) that looks made in MS paint.

NSFW

Spoiler

http://rule34-images.paheal.net/_im...ney Donald_Duck Mickey_Mouse Minnie_Mouse.png

 

[fade]

I've found drawn images quite evocative before. It's obviously not the ink and paper you're attracted to. It's the woman it represents.

 

[GasBandit]

There are much better sites for cartoon porn out there than rule34 .paheal .net

but so few have that oh-so-delicious WTFMYEYES factor.

 

[GasBandit]

There are much better sites for cartoon porn out there than rule34 .paheal .net

but so few have that oh-so-delicious WTFMYEYES factor.[/QUOTE]

So that's your fetish? Getting disgusted? I can help you with a few sites if that's what you're into.[/QUOTE]

Believe me, I don't need your help. Excuse me, I have to go google video search "pop cyst".

 

[PatrThom]

Believe me, I don't need your help. Excuse me, I have to go google video search "pop cyst".

Make sure you add 'perianal' to that query. An ex had one of those. Messy.

Also, I was much more disturbed by the pictures of Donald than anyone else. Just the idea of that machine-gun laugh/rant he has was enough to give my imagination enough ammo to wince a few times.

--Patrick

 

[Cajungal]

Do you dare?

Rule34.paheal presents...
minnie_mouse

DO YOU DARE?

(Not even remotely safe for work. Not safe for childhood. Not safe for sanity. Not safe for lunch, at the very least)

NOOO WHY!??!

 

[Philosopher B.]

I will never be aroused again.

 

[Chazwozel]

The idea of wanting to...what's the word...schtoink a comic character is a bit disturbing to me.

I like Jade's expression in the most recent comic

Soooo... It's disturbing to feel a little aroused by a drawing of a sexy woman?

Also, people who say they'd schtoink Minnie Mouse or something... THOSE guys are disturbing.[/QUOTE]

There's a pretty big difference between being aroused and wanting to schtoink. Being aroused by Jade? Maybe Frank Cho's version of Jade...but even then, I wasn't anywhere close to the mindset of "I'll be in my bunk".

And you're right about the Minnie Mouse thing...that is far more disturbing to me.[/QUOTE]

I too like to invest my emotion in things that are real, and not some bizarre fantasy of fucking cartoon characters.

 

[GasBandit]

The idea of wanting to...what's the word...schtoink a comic character is a bit disturbing to me.

I like Jade's expression in the most recent comic

Soooo... It's disturbing to feel a little aroused by a drawing of a sexy woman?

Also, people who say they'd schtoink Minnie Mouse or something... THOSE guys are disturbing.[/QUOTE]

There's a pretty big difference between being aroused and wanting to schtoink. Being aroused by Jade? Maybe Frank Cho's version of Jade...but even then, I wasn't anywhere close to the mindset of "I'll be in my bunk".

And you're right about the Minnie Mouse thing...that is far more disturbing to me.[/QUOTE]

I too like to invest my emotion in things that are real, and not some bizarre fantasy of fucking cartoon characters.[/QUOTE]

If you're telling me watching Heavy Metal back in the 80s didn't titillate you even in the slightest, you're a damn liar.

 

[Fun Size]

Or Daphne from Scooby Doo. Amirite guys?

:tumbleweed:

Guys?

 

[fade]

I still don't get it. It's the woman and the sexuality it represents. If you want to get technical, it's no less "real" than a photograph. Do those get you excited?

 

[GasBandit]

I still don't get it. It's the woman and the sexuality it represents. If you want to get technical, it's no less "real" than a photograph. Do those get you excited?

This is the part where he says at least a photograph is an image of something that IS real. Seriously, didn't we JUST have this discussion in 2007?

 

[ScytheRexx]

Personally, I like drawn depictions of sex often times more then photographs, as they allow freedom to create imagery that is fantastical and often times more aesthetically pleasing. Though, that does not mean I would pick a drawn image of sex over actual sex or live nudity, I don't think anyone is that silly.

 

[fade]

I still don't get it. It's the woman and the sexuality it represents. If you want to get technical, it's no less "real" than a photograph. Do those get you excited?

This is the part where he says at least a photograph is an image of something that IS real. Seriously, didn't we JUST have this discussion in 2007?[/QUOTE]

But, so are the aspects of the drawing that evoke sexual feelings.

Yeah, I've noticed the discussions cycle a lot here.

 

[Silver Jelly]

I still don't get it. It's the woman and the sexuality it represents. If you want to get technical, it's no less "real" than a photograph. Do those get you excited?

This is the part where he says at least a photograph is an image of something that IS real. Seriously, didn't we JUST have this discussion in 2007?[/QUOTE]

But, so are the aspects of the drawing that evoke sexual feelings.

Yeah, I've noticed the discussions cycle a lot here.[/QUOTE]

Also, rare steak.

 

[Gusto]

Chili without beans is scarcely chili at all.

 

[North_Ranger]

I still don't get it. It's the woman and the sexuality it represents. If you want to get technical, it's no less "real" than a photograph. Do those get you excited?

Or paintings for that matter. Good art (including statues, etc..) is even supposed to invoke feelings and emotions. And yes, sometimes even arousal. But even the most realistic paintings are still painted globs on a canvas. Nothing like the real thing.

Or hell, porn.. It's still a flat 2D screen (usually) you are watching it on. People you don't even know. How SICK![/QUOTE]

Thanks to the both of you for putting the matter so eloquently. That's pretty much how I view these things. Liberty Meadows, Heavy Metal (the old one, not the crappy remake), certain European comics (eg. Druuna), Jade's new design in PvP... seriously, those are some quite beautiful drawn women.

Also, people take me way too seriously. I just like to take these moments to promote the use of the word "schtoink" It's gonna be the next big thing, you'll see!

 

[GasBandit]

MAD Magazine's on the phone, NR, they want to have a word with you...

 

[North_Ranger]

Personally, I like drawn depictions of sex often times more then photographs, as they allow freedom to create imagery that is fantastical and often times more aesthetically pleasing.

That's true. Especially considering that truly aesthetic photography of the nude female form tends to get swamped in the sea of bad porn. Frank Cho's already been mentioned, and I admit finding his work... invigorating.

Though, that does not mean I would pick a drawn image of sex over actual sex or live nudity, I don't think anyone is that silly.

Unless they're that Asian guy who's in love with an anime pillow

---------- Post added at 01:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 AM ----------

MAD Magazine's on the phone, NR, they want to have a word with you...

I will only negotiate with Mr Neumann. In person.

And tell them to stop sending Spy vs Spy to rub me off! I've had to throw their unconscious asses out of the house twice already this week! Those guys just can't work together.

 

[Jay]

Spoiler

http://rule34-images.paheal.net/_im...ney Donald_Duck Mickey_Mouse Minnie_Mouse.png

HOLY FUCK DID I LOL HARD

HAHAHAHAAA

 

[Dave]

Getting back to the PvP part of this PvP thread...

Yesterday's strip (read this morning) had me rolling! Apparently Scott has been taking some crap about the new improved Jade.

PvPonline » Archive » Take My Wife…

I fricking love it!

 

[Dave]

In that last panel when she smiles she looks like a REAL PERSON!

It's a wonderful improvement over art I didn't know needed improvement.

 

[SpecialKO]

In that last panel when she smiles she looks like a REAL PERSON!

It's a wonderful improvement over art I didn't know needed improvement.

Seriously, apparently Scott should have moved in with the P-A guys years ago.

 

[North_Ranger]

In that last panel when she smiles she looks like a REAL PERSON!

It's a wonderful improvement over art I didn't know needed improvement.

Seriously, apparently Scott should have moved in with the P-A guys years ago.[/QUOTE]

Does anyone here doubt that this is exactly the reason why his art is improving?[/QUOTE]

Well, it's certainly not his fans and readers who are offering constructive criticism about his craft.

Bazinga.