Before you label many parents idiots, keep in mind the paternal/maternal instinct tends to hold priority over rationality. It's not an excuse for foolish behavior, but it is a cause of it.Seems like a lot of parents don't realize that children don't see things the way adults do.
Because a lot of parents are morons.
Any one appearing on Sesame Street falls into the role model category. I wouldn't want my kids identifying with a woman with her tits out and a dress that barely falls below her ass. It is just a simple modesty standard.It's moronic to think that a kid is going to see it and think of it as an adult does. They can have their own reasons for disapproving, but that one is stupid.
If you were my son, I'd have a problem with you still watching Tinkerbell cartoons...I have no trouble with my little sister watching stuff about Tinkerbell (and neither do my parents), but I guess that this is personal criteria.
So, let me see if i have interpreted your sarcasm correctly. Are you saying that it's ok to show guro and anime rape to kids, because it's not real people?[/QUOTE]Real people are just the same as cartoon fairies...
So, let me see if i have interpreted your sarcasm correctly. Are you saying that it's ok to show guro and anime rape to kids, because it's not real people?[/QUOTE]Real people are just the same as cartoon fairies...
She's asking Elmo to play dress up.It may be worth pointing out that appropriateness has a great deal to do with the situation.
Pocohontas and Tinkerbell are dressed as such because that is appropriate daily wear for their culture.
Dressing in a bathing suit that shows more than the Elmo clip is appropriate at a swimming pool, but would be inappropriate at the office.
I think one of the reasons people are a bit divided about this clip is that there's no information about the environment. She starts out in an alley or on the street, and the clips flick around to other locales, although I don't know that she fits in any of them. Her outfit would obviously be fine in a G rated movie as a wedding dress - at a wedding.
Keep in mind also that tinkerbell's outfit covers far more of her breast than Katy's did.
I think that if you account for skimpy-clothing inflation, you'll find that those images were equally risque for their time as Tinkerbell is for our time. Shoot, you can see her ankles! What were these artists teaching kids in those days?!Actually, Disney invented that look for fairies. Historically, they were depicted with long flowing outfits. Here's a Victorian painting of a fairy riding butterflies, for comparison.
They are both okay in my bookwhy is it ok for Tink to be a sexpot, but not Katy Perry
POIDH.My wife has Katy Perry and Disney both beat, she walks around the house top-less and exposes our daughter to bewbage on a daily basis.
Well it was bound to I suppose.I'm glad this has turned into a fairy discussion.