Irony

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just came here to post a link to that same story.

Some of the comments along the lines of "He died doing what he loved," really piss me off.

I doubt he loved smashing his skull against the pavement.
 

Dave

Staff member
A guy who was on a motorcycle ride protesting the helmet laws crashed and died from massive head wounds. Medical personnel at the scene say if he'd been wearing a helmet he'd have lived.

IRONY!!
 
A motorcyclist that was protesting helmet laws. He was in a crash that killed him, but he would have lived if he was obeying the law (wearing a helmet.)
 
J

Joe Johnson

Oh, I see it now. I completely missed the link in that post the first time.
 
the irony would be if Chris was dating a minor (under 18)
Or 16, or 14, or even 13 in some places... or even 21...

The ages themselves are pretty arbitrary... the idea is that he's dating a woman that could be his daughter easily... and he broke the half+7 rule... 25+7 > 30.
Added at: 11:35
Some of the comments along the lines of "He died doing what he loved," really piss me off.

I doubt he loved smashing his skull against the pavement.
To be fair, he did love to allow for the possibility of getting his brains splattered all over the side-walk...
 
C

Chibibar

Or 16, or 14, or even 13 in some places... or even 21...

The ages themselves are pretty arbitrary... the idea is that he's dating a woman that could be his daughter easily... and he broke the half+7 rule... 25+7 > 30.
Added at: 11:35

To be fair, he did love to allow for the possibility of getting his brains splattered all over the side-walk...
He may, BUT he is still doing it legally.
As long he doesn't chase girls under age of 18, there is no irony really. (IMO)
Now, if he start chasing underage kids, then we have issues.
Now that is the legal side.

Morally, who knows. Back in the days, older men married younger women to have children.
 
We still use 'have/had' here.

This whole conversation has been confusing to me. I'm not that far from, well, everywhere else. How is the language so different?
 
M

makare

I've heard people say they've had someone but not that they are going to have someone. If some guy says I must have her I am thinking he means as his wife.... and he is pretending to be Rhett Butler.

or in fact IS Rhett Butler.
 
There is also an implication of force in that usage... like the whipping and having quote. Which is why it is not used in that sense very often.

There are scant words in our language that at one time or another did not have sexual connotations.

Heck 15 years ago "to talk to" a girl meant intercourse... wait...
 
He may, BUT he is still doing it legally.
As long he doesn't chase girls under age of 18, there is no irony really. (IMO)
Irony cares not for the laws of men...

What if he was dating a 17 year old in a state where the legal age was 16? It would not be illegal either... but it would be more obviously irony...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top