Or 16, or 14, or even 13 in some places... or even 21...the irony would be if Chris was dating a minor (under 18)
To be fair, he did love to allow for the possibility of getting his brains splattered all over the side-walk...Some of the comments along the lines of "He died doing what he loved," really piss me off.
I doubt he loved smashing his skull against the pavement.
He may, BUT he is still doing it legally.Or 16, or 14, or even 13 in some places... or even 21...
The ages themselves are pretty arbitrary... the idea is that he's dating a woman that could be his daughter easily... and he broke the half+7 rule... 25+7 > 30.
Added at: 11:35
To be fair, he did love to allow for the possibility of getting his brains splattered all over the side-walk...
huh? You lost meYep, to have the child that they married.
Wictionary said:(transitive) To engage in sexual intercourse with.
- He's always bragging about how many women he's had.
It's a little archaic, but I still see it in the occasional british TV show.I've heard had but not to have.
This is a picture of who delivered that line:ah well that makes sense.
mmm the lashing and the having..
an "H."what is that on his forehead?
That sounds like Nick's Prom NightTM..."I'm going to lash you within an inch of your life, and then I'm going to have you." - Demon Rimmer
Irony cares not for the laws of men...He may, BUT he is still doing it legally.
As long he doesn't chase girls under age of 18, there is no irony really. (IMO)