Real Life Barbie

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait, I'm back in my hometown again? :fu:

No offense meant figmentPez , it's just that I actually do take offense when people explain their actions due to religion. Good or bad. You should be a good or bad person just because it's within you to be that way, not because a book/preacher told you to be.


Yes you are, however there will be times, whether he means it or not, that he'll fantasize or even briefly think of procreating with someone else. The thing that makes him a good husband/partner is that he doesn't act on his nature.

The part that I was talking about not being mentally healthy is a completely sexually devoid lifestyle.

Try probably every 15 seconds! And that goes for her too. There is probably not one day that goes by where either consciously or subconsciously you don't want to fuck the shit out of someone you saw out on the street.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Biology says monogamy is the biological copout of evolution's losers and women were made (or rather, evolved for) cheatin'.

In other words, tiger woods screws everything he can because he can. You don't because you can't.

However, that's just the biological angle. There's also a societal angle which, on a number of different fronts, exists to repress actions based solely on biological impulse.
 
I like how figmentPez is going post by post disagreeing with proven fact/science. It's not an opinion, there's nothing to disagree with.

I know your religion says different, but it also don't believe in dinosaurs.
 
Try probably every 15 seconds! And that goes for her too. There is probably not one day that goes by where either consciously or subconsciously you don't want to fuck the shit out of someone you saw out on the street.
Nope, not at all. Not sex. I'm to busy fantasizing about my husband. ;)
 
I like how figmentPez is going post by post disagreeing with proven fact/science. It's not an opinion, there's nothing to disagree with.

i like how instead of growing a pair and making his argument, he's passive-aggressively labeling posts he doesn't like with his "disagree" stamp.

Sorry, bud. The male brain is wired for wanting to bone pretty much every female you encounter. The main reason why a heterosexual male might not be attracted at all to Barbie zilla in the OP is because she's sporting some pretty shitty child bearing hips. Otherwise, big boobs, big eyes, hourglass figure - she's got what is deemed attractive by nature.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
i like how instead of growing a pair and making his argument, he's passive-aggressively labeling posts he doesn't like with his "disagree" stamp.
I don't begrudge him his "disagree" click. There are times I want to express disagreement without starting/continuing a long discussion as well.
 
Nope, not at all. Not sex. I'm to busy fantasizing about my husband.
I could swear I read some where that some women actually change biology when satisfied in a relationship, I could be remembering incorrectly though.

Mathias - Religion will always disagree with Science because it destroys the entire facade that it uses to control it's masses. I've said a thousand times that I have no problem with people who use religion to better themselves, but to cling to it in the face of factual disagreement is just mind blowing.
 
I'm getting such a hilarious kick out of watching figmentPez do this. It's unreal to the point of straight out laughter.

Seriously kiddo, I know you've up to your eyeballs in issues, physical/mental but this is just beyond that. You'll note that I've never made fun of you or your problems, but for you to disagree with posts that are not even attacking you, simply stating proven Scientific fact make you look very ignorant and close minded.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Furthermore I want to say that it's not inconceivable that, if fervent enough, religious belief could alter one's cognition enough to change (or even eliminate) your sexual impulses. After all, psychological conditioning is nothing to sneeze at, and really what IS organized religion other than incessant psychological conditioning starting from day one? If you can quit smoking, a scientifically recognized chemical addiction, by having the act mentally/psychologically associated with something disgusting, you can do so on matters sexual as well. This is not to say what is right, wrong, or natural... just... possible.
 
I could swear I read some where that some women actually change biology when satisfied in a relationship, I could be remembering incorrectly though.

Mathias - Religion will always disagree with Science because it destroys the entire facade that it uses to control it's masses. I've said a thousand times that I have no problem with people who use religion to better themselves, but to cling to it in the face of factual disagreement is just mind blowing.
I could buy that - it explains why I haven't been gettin any for the past month...
I'm getting such a hilarious kick out of watching figmentPez do this. It's unreal to the point of straight out laughter.

Seriously kiddo, I know you've up to your eyeballs in issues, physical/mental but this is just beyond that.

Oh man, he sure got you with his "disagree".

Well I'm out of this thread. I'm going to go jack off to some of the women he appreciates ever so much in his cos-play thread.
 
Furthermore I want to say that it's not inconceivable that, if fervent enough, religious belief could alter one's cognition enough to change (or even eliminate) your sexual impulses. After all, psychological conditioning is nothing to sneeze at, and really what IS organized religion other than incessant psychological conditioning starting from day one? If you can quit smoking, a scientifically recognized chemical addiction, by having the act mentally/psychologically associated with something disgusting, you can do so to on matters sexual as well. This is not to say what is right, wrong, or natural... just... possible.

Oh just like that one episode of House!
 
i like how instead of growing a pair and making his argument, he's passive-aggressively labeling posts he doesn't like with his "disagree" stamp.

Sorry, bud. The male brain is wired for wanting to bone pretty much every female you encounter. The main reason why a heterosexual male might not be attracted at all to Barbie zilla in the OP is because she's sporting some pretty shitty child bearing hips. Otherwise, big boobs, big eyes, hourglass figure - she's got what is deemed attractive by nature.
Actually, the hourglass figure is contrary to biological motives. Having a waist that thin is again not conducive to childbirth. One of the reasons Marilyn Monroe is held up as the pinnacle of beauty is because she does have all those features that make her ideal for having kids. Funny thing is that she wouldn't even get a modelling contract today.
 
Actually, the hourglass figure is contrary to biological motives. Having a waist that thin is again not conducive to childbirth. One of the reasons Marilyn Monroe is held up as the pinnacle of beauty is because she does have all those features that make her ideal for having kids. Funny thing is that she wouldn't even get a modelling contract today.
Well no, the hourglass figure is an exaggeration of the naturally desirable large child-bearing hips.

Barbie is an exaggeration. Big eyes, big boobs, and big hips.
 
Well this is fun. Nothing like logging into the forum and finding a thread that has generated a shit ton of reports from all corners of the forum. Clearly we are doing something wrong if we can take a thread like this and turn it into a way to be assholes to each other.



Good job people. :lock:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top