Yep you cant read. A guide to sex by a priest (who either hasnt had much sex lately) is as idiotic as having a dumb dramatic jock who cant read post exactly what I questioned.Chazwozel said:JCM said:Seeing that he´s a priest, which means he doesnt even have sex, might I suggest the other guides- "The blind´s guide to looking?" or "Mav´s tips on how to get a girl into bed"?
Christ almighty, do you ever actually read anything before you post? Because I sure dont do it."Some people, when they hear about the holiness of married sex, immediately imagine that such sex has to be deprived of joy, frivolous play, fantasy and attractive positions," he writes.
"[They think] it has to be sad like a traditional church hymn.
"Every act - a type of caress, a sexual position - with the goal of arousal is permitted and pleases God. During sexual intercourse, married couples can show their love in every way, can offer one another the most sought-after caresses."
He was too busy reading a certain book.
Also, I'm curious aboutt his book.
[/quote:j1pmfph8]JCM said:Yep you cant read. A guide to sex by a priest (who either hasnt had much sex lately) is as idiotic as having a dumb dramatic jock who cant read post exactly what I questioned.Chazwozel said:JCM said:Seeing that he´s a priest, which means he doesnt even have sex, might I suggest the other guides- "The blind´s guide to looking?" or "Mav´s tips on how to get a girl into bed"?
Christ almighty, do you ever actually read anything before you post? Because I sure dont do it."Some people, when they hear about the holiness of married sex, immediately imagine that such sex has to be deprived of joy, frivolous play, fantasy and attractive positions," he writes.
"[They think] it has to be sad like a traditional church hymn.
"Every act - a type of caress, a sexual position - with the goal of arousal is permitted and pleases God. During sexual intercourse, married couples can show their love in every way, can offer one another the most sought-after caresses."
I suggest sticking to Karate for dummies.
[quote:j1pmfph8]He was too busy reading a certain book.
Also, I'm curious aboutt his book.
You didn't even read the OP quote and made that assumption. Am I anywhere disagreeing that a sex book by a priest is a little weird? I agree, it's a stupid concept to take sex tips from a priest, but your assumptions are completely pulled out of your ass when the OP quotes him as stating the complete opposite. And you can start throwing around your childish insults all you want, I'm not the one who posts assumptions without even reading the source material and understanding it.Let me guess, man on top, oral sex is a no-no and anal brings you and your wife to the fiery pits of *?
I said what I have to say. That's all from me. There's no possible way he can bullshit himself out of this one. There's no opinion to the matter at all, so anything he has to say any further than what I posted is moot.Math242 said:god damn it, you two better not ruin this thread.
What?!? Really? I'm fine and dandy. I take pleasure in picking apart JCM's nonsensical logic. In the tasering thread Tin and I were having a good laugh over PM's. Honestly, I've only been set off like once or twice by bewildering stupidity, otherwise I'm happy as a clam when I post.LordRavage said:I worry about you Chaz.
I keep picturing a blood vessel in your skull ready to pop everytime you read the forums. :uhhuh:
I'm not debating anything other than what the priest was quoted in saying and what JCM inferred the book was going to be about without actually reading the source material (or reading it and completely doing a fly by in understanding it).zero said:Heh... well, you gotta admit, Catholic church view on sex is something that is very badly misunderstood, even by some Catholics (and yeah, the church is to blame on that). JCM's assumptions are sadly very common, even within Catholics. In fact, I'm somehow surprised Chaz is so enlightened in this obscure matter (I remember something about Chaz being raised as a Catholic, but driven away by some idiotic priest... am I right?).
The whole view of the Church on sex is to create huge solid catholic families. Here's some Catholic church "do and do not" concerning sex:
- Do not have sex before marriage.
- Do not have sex outside your marriage.
- Do not use contraceptives.
- DO have a LOT OF sex with your mate (in fact, it is a severe sin to not have sex while being married).
About anal and oral, they aren't by any means a "sin" inside the catholic church! Just make sure you won't be doing it in prejudice of the traditional way (otherwise, see, no babies...).
Certainly, the contraceptive matter is the most controversial today, it is not clear that the population grow is sustainable in today's world (although the effects of increased lifespan are arguably much worse, and I don't see many people defending the hurling of elders in tar pits). Besides that one, I'd say those aren't really unreasonable... (yes, yes, before anyone ask, I am NOT married, I DO have sex while using contraceptives... shame on me, I guess... )
Sounds like a plan, I'm all for it. Age 37 or a bit higher? :-Pzero said:I don't see many people defending the hurling of elders in tar pits
ahChazwozel said:Let me put this bluntly: I DON'T CARE WHAT THIS PRIEST OR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS TO SAY ABOUT SEX.
A sever sin huh? I guess a lot of married couple are going to hell now (general assumption that married people have fewer sex, at least for some couple )zero said:- DO have a LOT OF sex with your mate (in fact, it is a severe sin to not have sex while being married).
By dogma, the most famous married couple in the Bible did not have children of their own. They got a loaner from God.Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
Yeah the sacrament of marriage is deeply steeped in the whole concept of "go forth and multiply" business. I mean the whole institution is one of only seven sacramental rights of the religion, so it's understandable that lack sex (sex being an important concept of marriage) would be a sin. A priest would phrase it as "denying a gift that God has given you."Chibibar said:A sever sin huh? I guess a lot of married couple are going to * now (general assumption that married people have fewer sex, at least for some couple )zero said:- DO have a LOT OF sex with your mate (in fact, it is a severe sin to not have sex while being married).
Damn Iaculus, now you hit a touchy subject... You are right, many priests refuse to celebrate weddings between infertile people. It seems a little harsh, but if you consider that the catholic wedding is not about celebration of love between two people but as the beginning of a new family, some feel it would be hypocritical to do otherwise...Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
So lets assume that a couple who is not infertile married, but later decide NOT to have kids and have his tube tied (or hers) would that consider be contraceptive? or commit great sin since they can't produce kids.zero said:Damn Iaculus, now you hit a touchy subject... You are right, many priests refuse to celebrate weddings between infertile people. It seems a little harsh, but if you consider that the catholic wedding is not about celebration of love between two people but as the beginning of a new family, some feel it would be hypocritical to do otherwise...Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
I'm not sure, but I don't think a priest and bishop would have particular beef with that kind of marriage. There are other aspects to marriage aside from having children of your own.Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
Chaz, you can't really blame people who get confused about your interest on Church's view on sex (particularly considering the subject of this thread...)Chazwozel said:Yeah the sacrament of marriage is deeply steeped in the whole concept of "go forth and multiply" business. I mean the whole institution is one of only seven sacramental rights of the religion, so it's understandable that lack sex (sex being an important concept of marriage) would be a sin. A priest would phrase it as "denying a gift that God has given you."
zero said:Damn Iaculus, now you hit a touchy subject... You are right, many priests refuse to celebrate weddings between infertile people. It seems a little harsh, but if you consider that the catholic wedding is not about celebration of love between two people but as the beginning of a new family, some feel it would be hypocritical to do otherwise...Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
I swore you said "Apollo Creeds" at first. I laughed until I realized I read it wrong.Chazwozel said:Priest to infertile married couple: "Eh, gimme 15 Hail Mary's and 2 Apostle's Creeds and we'll call it even."
zero said:Chaz, you can't really blame people who get confused about your interest on Church's view on sex (particularly considering the subject of this thread...)Chazwozel said:Yeah the sacrament of marriage is deeply steeped in the whole concept of "go forth and multiply" business. I mean the whole institution is one of only seven sacramental rights of the religion, so it's understandable that lack sex (sex being an important concept of marriage) would be a sin. A priest would phrase it as "denying a gift that God has given you."
Yeah, to marry within the Catholic Church and decide to not have children after is a severe no-no... In fact, even have a few children and have your "tubes tied" could be frowned upon (which isn't admittedly very reasonable considering, as you said, the resources involved in raising a child today...)Chibibar said:So lets assume that a couple who is not infertile married, but later decide NOT to have kids and have his tube tied (or hers) would that consider be contraceptive? or commit great sin since they can't produce kids.zero said:Damn Iaculus, now you hit a touchy subject... You are right, many priests refuse to celebrate weddings between infertile people. It seems a little harsh, but if you consider that the catholic wedding is not about celebration of love between two people but as the beginning of a new family, some feel it would be hypocritical to do otherwise...Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
While it is all fine and dandy of producing a family BUT it is expensive to raise a child (or slew of them), the money required rest upon the couple and their family.
DramaLlamaChaz said:ANGRY LLAMA IS ANGRY!!
ANGRY LLAMA CANNOT UNDERSTAND SIMPLE ENGLISH!!
JCM NERD MUST NOT HAVE SEX GAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!
ANGRY LLAMA WRITE IN BOOOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I must admit loving to bait him into another goodbye thread, posting shitty traced drawings or complaining about nerds.LordRavage said:I worry about you Chaz.
I keep picturing a blood vessel in your skull ready to pop everytime you read the forums. :uhhuh:
Ouch... thats a good question.Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
As I said, that's a very touchy subject. A priest could in thesis refuse to celebrate such wedding, although it may be unlikely (after all, one can always argue that infertility is by no means an absolute, Medical science evolves, and miracles may happen...). But this is all speculation from my part. What I know for sure is that infertility is one of the few solid reasons for nullification of a Catholic marriage.JCM said:Ouch... thats a good question.Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
I teach a group of priests every Monday, this will be an interesting question to put forth to them, but so far what I know is that the church doesnt condemn it or other cases like older infertile people having sex.zero said:As I said, that's a very touchy subject. A priest could in thesis refuse to celebrate such wedding, although it may be unlikely (after all, one can always argue that infertility is by no means an absolute, Medical science evolves, and miracles may happen...). But this is all speculation from my part. What I know for sure is that infertility is one of the few solid reasons for nullification of a Catholic marriage.JCM said:Ouch... thats a good question.Iaculus said:Incidentally, what's the Catholic take on marrying someone you know is infertile? Given that marriage is largely about producing children from that perspective.
Some good links on this would be-Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC):
2362 "The acts in marriage by which the intimate and chaste union of the spouses takes place are noble and honorable; the truly human performance of these acts fosters the self-giving they signify and enriches the spouses in joy and gratitude."144 Sexuality is a source of joy and pleasure:
The Creator himself . . . established that in the [generative] function, spouses should experience pleasure and enjoyment of body and spirit. Therefore, the spouses do nothing evil in seeking this pleasure and enjoyment. They accept what the Creator has intended for them. At the same time, spouses should know how to keep themselves within the limits of just moderation.145
@Li3n said:Well i can't speak for catholics, but as i recall it's the trying that's important... being infertile isn't a choice like using contraceptives.
*bows* Always glad to poke fun at jocks stuck in mid-age crisis.@Li3n said:he never does... good ol trusty jcm... you can always count on him
Found this-Well i can't speak for catholics, but as i recall it's the trying that's important... being infertile isn't a choice like using contraceptives.
Again, reading comprehension fail.JCM said:*bows* Always glad to poke fun at jocks stuck in mid-age crisis.@Li3n said:he never does... good ol trusty jcm... you can always count on him
Well i can't speak for catholics, but as i recall it's the trying that's important... being infertile isn't a choice like using contraceptives.
Actually there was a few studies that came out a couple of years ago that showed that married couples tend to have the most satisfying sex lives. :heythere:Chibibar said:A sever sin huh? I guess a lot of married couple are going to * now (general assumption that married people have fewer sex, at least for some couple )zero said:- DO have a LOT OF sex with your mate (in fact, it is a severe sin to not have sex while being married).
I must agree with this 100%... I wouldnt change sex in a relationship for various sex partners ever... while the hunt is fun, there´s nothing like the closeness and familiarity of someone you love.Espy said:Actually there was a few studies that came out a couple of years ago that showed that married couples tend to have the most satisfying sex lives.
Offtopic insistence fail?Chaz said:btw, I'm 27, although I have been looking into buying a BMW M3...