That's me pretty much, maybe bring it up to 16 years. Spider-man ruined the magazines thanks to that stupid Clone Saga and having to buy $20 worth of comics each month with their pointless shiny covers just to get the whole story. Since then I only bought books as well, either trades or graphic novels. Just bought a shit-ton of Hellboy and BPRD.I haven't bought a comic outside of a "comic-novel" in about 10yrs so this is my attempt to get back into it from "scratch".
I was referring to Rene Montoya in Gotham Central. As in, the general public would rather pick up a Batman Vs. Two Face story in Detective Comics than Gotham Central. I know it is a relatively ancient example, but it is a series already mentioned in the thread.That angsty lesbian detective (Stumptown) is a damn good detective book.
Added at: 21:58
The funny thing is, though, that there are some really good comics that people might have heard of, anyway. For example, both A History of Violence and Road to Perdition originated as graphic novels.
You know that's actually my biggest problem with this "reboot". These books are still riddled with references to past stories, it's just that they are the stories written in the last few years. It feels like they wiped clean any work done by writers not currently working for DC and only kept plot points from the writers of the last couple of years. It's all fine and good to say we are starting over but they really aren't. I think many new readers will be just as confused as if they hadn't re-numbered anything and just continued with the status quo.I actually wish they had done a hard reboot. Just wipe the slate clean.
Honestly though, it doesn't matter. These characters have been around FOREVER, so there isn't much new to do with them considering they do have a status quo they have to keep up. Mainstream comics will always have a circular narrative, with the same stories and ideas going around every few years/decades.
Well, that looks like a pile of shit; especially that last panel about merging the timelines or whatever, which seems to say this #1 isn't about getting new readers but about doing the bullshit again.My other beef is higher editorial decisions getting in the way of a comic. To be honest, DC is already kind of falling into that trap, with a woman appearing mysteriously in the background of nearly every one of their books so far: http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/09...of-the-strange-woman-in-this-weeks-dc-comics/ That worries me because it's all just a set up for the next big event. But if it doesn't interfere with the stories that each creative team is telling, then I'll be okay with it.
Well, if I see the ones I'm interested in show up on the digital, I'll go for it. But I'm not interesting in paying $4.50 to $5.00 for a magazine comic. Not worth it. I got my Hellboy trades for two dollars more than that, new.Can't blame ya there. Although, as far as digital goes, I'm absolutely certain that they're all going to be available. I was looking on Comixology today and all the #1's out so far were listed.
I should toss a goopy baterang at you for not saying Batgirl V3.Secret Six was absolutely the best title that DC is not continuing with the relaunch.
DC reboot, all the way! I'm getting me to the comic store!On a slightly related note: I got a date this weekend with a cute comic geek I met today while picking up my issues.
Same except it was a Justice League instead of Batgirl. I went in to check out Batwing and Green Arrow--nothing left.My LCS is sold out of all new 52 books except for a single issue of Batgirl that was brought back in by the owner.
Huh. This version of GA seems to have a lot less of a social conscience than the old DCU version, but is focused on using his vast resources to basically be a bounty hunter of low level metacriminals (he spends most of this issue going after some metahuman punks who live like minor celebrities).Norris, your Green Arrow review has me interested. I loved Silver Age GA, and the 80s-90s Grell run with Ollie especially.
Go on.Not sure wherelse to update this, so here goes:
So Saturday night's date went pretty damn well. Met up at one of my favorite little dive bars here in town. I was absolutely blown away by how good she "cleaned up". Not that she didn't look cute before in her comic T and jeans but seeing her in strap buckle dress boots, long trench dress and her hair down was a very nice surprise. We were there no more than about an hour or so when she asked me if I wanted to watch a movie. Since there really wasn't anything at the theatre and I had already made a few small moves on her, I told her I wouldn't mind rewatching something at her place.... We got about a quarter through *REC2 (which she hadn't seen yet that I got her to download/watch) before we weren't watching the screen anymore. Woke up on Sunday, went out for breakfast, talked a little more then I headed home.
It was a fun little night, talked a bit about mostly misc nonsense (no real comic/geek talk) but so far it seems like we're going to end up as FwB. I mean I didn't really feel anything for her romantically, but we have alot in common (She plays MtG and I'm an old vet at it. She's an old vet at comics and I'm barely getting back into it) so I can definitely see a fun relationship coming from this. Not to mention she's fantastic under the sheets. The only negative that really hit me through the night was her mentioning her bi-sexuality. I mean, I have nothing against people like that, it's just that most of the time it comes off as half-assed when it comes to same-sex play. More like it's a hobby for them more than a lifestyle, she however, proved that I had nothing to worry about there.
Already in talk (texts) about our next outing. She's definitely someone I could finally attend a "comic/game con" with, so that's another big plus.
Want to... snark... so bad, but don't wanna drag Asking sub-forum into here... damn you...On a side note - I loaned (and will continue to loan) a bunch of my DC comics to the cute girl who may or may not be into me. So yeah.
For GL, you know all you need to know...in terms of plotting. Hal has lost his ring, and his ring has chosen Sinestro as his replacement. If you are curious about the how/why, you can read the books prior to the reboot, but if not, that's the start of the current storyline/conflict.Can someone explain the continuity...? I pick up a few issues of the New 52 (sold out of most) and its like they just threw new fans in the pan of fire on this one. Case in point, Batman #1, you see the Robin's (and Nightwing) ok it at least mentions their name and such but you're just supposed to assume he's had three Robins? Or Green Lantern #1, Hal lost his ring, Sinestro is back etc etc
I get the old storylines, been reading DC for 20+ years now but looking at it from a "new fan" angle, they seem to expect you to know a lot off hand.
There are 4 by my count, but maybe the reboot changed the continuity a little. There's Dick Grayson (now Nightwing), Jason Todd (now Red Hood), Tim Drake (now Red Robin), and finally Damien Wanye(plain old Robin). There's also Stephanie Brown but she seems to have gotten the shaft completely in this reboot as she appears to be absent entirely; no longer Robin, Batgirl or Spoiler.For GL, you know all you need to know...in terms of plotting. Hal has lost his ring, and his ring has chosen Sinestro as his replacement. If you are curious about the how/why, you can read the books prior to the reboot, but if not, that's the start of the current storyline/conflict.
And yes, Batman has had 3 Robins. The current one is his biological son Damian Wayne.
It's a good thing they rebooted the whole universe to make it easier for new and returning readers to understand everything.So now that the first round of 52 is over.... what the fuck is up with continuity?
Is the "new" Justice League/Action comics in the same universe as Green Lantern#1 etc? Are Batman, Detective Comics, Catwoman, Batgirl, Suicide Squad all in the same universe/storyline?
I'm lost as shit.
It's only confusing if you think about it from the frame of mind of a longer term reader who cares about "shared universe" and "continuity". Which most new readers aren't...give them time to appreciate those nuances.It's a good thing they rebooted the whole universe to make it easier for new and returning readers to understand everything.
The cloak was one of the vestments of his office as Sorcerer Supreme. There isn't a Sorcerer Supreme anymore. So no cloak. He's been rocking a trench coat and business suit for two years now, this is kind of step back into super-hero fashion.This is nitpicking, but man, why would they get rid of Dr. Strange's awesome cloak? Now he just looks like some kung-fu guy that fight in tournaments with Iron Fist?
Well that's just creepy.1) Congratulations!
2) As a slightly pudgy, average looking comic book nerd who can't even talk to girls romantically, I hate you with every fiber of my soul. Nothing personal.
Punisher.So I love me some Batman but pretty much dislike everything Robin/Nightwing/Batwing etc related. I like it simple. Batman vs Villains. What trades should I be picking up month to month and what's the difference between: Detective Comics - Dark Knight and Batman?
Is Brother Voodoo not the Sorcerer Supreme anymore?The cloak was one of the vestments of his office as Sorcerer Supreme. There isn't a Sorcerer Supreme anymore. So no cloak. He's been rocking a trench coat and business suit for two years now, this is kind of step back into super-hero fashion.
Spoilers for a year old storyline:Is Brother Voodoo not the Sorcerer Supreme anymore?
Well, each writer is going to have their own take on Batman but if you mean in basic premise, then no. All three are Batman fighting villains solo.So then there's zero difference, just more stories per month?
I'm already following Batgirl, Suicide Squad and JLA so I really didn't want to follow more than one Batman title.
I thought that was what they were trying to do with the All-Stars comics, which were half-fail.I picked up the Flashpoint trade, and haven't even been able to get into it. I found it kind of boring. I'm not a fan of an entire reboot like this. I still don't understand why they didn't do a seperate imprint, like with the marvel ultimate line, but oh well. Comics are really low on my priority list at the moment.
Yeah, the Superman one was COMPLETE garbage. All-Star Batman though, best comic in 20 years.I thought that was what they were trying to do with the All-Stars comics, which were half-fail.
Did Professor X start walking again? I know he does that from time to time.Now it's just, who, Daredevil?
He's dead, I think. He's done that multiple times too.Did Professor X start walking again? I know he does that from time to time.
He's dead again?He's dead, I think. He's done that multiple times too.
Nope. Professor X is currently alive, telepathic, and walking. He's just been pushed somewhat out of focus the last few years in favor Cyclops (who has morphed into a fiercely pragmatic survivalist and de facto leader of all mutantkind...at least until Wolverine and a few X-Men decided to leave the mutant island nation of Utopia and rebuild the school).He's dead again?
He's fucking worse than Magneto.
Yea I dropped Batgirl. I think it's sad that these are the stories they desperately needed Barbara in order to tell. It's about as bad as when Barry came back and did nothing but act like an angry brooding loner who didn't have time for everything.I'm not a fan of non-crippled Babs for 2 reasons.
She was awesome as Oracle.
She was one of the very few disabled characters in comics that was awesome.
Now it's just, who, Daredevil?
No they were indeed half-fail. People like to forget this and just praise ASS, but the All-Star line was supposed to be a complete line, with a different superstar creative team writing each arc. The problem was ASBAR was terrible, and both titles had the absolute worst creative teams for sticking to any kind of schedule. It's hard to promote a line when it takes you 3 years to get out one arc (out of 2 attempted).Yeah, the Superman one was COMPLETE garbage. All-Star Batman though, best comic in 20 years.
It was so good that it would do it a disservice for Miller and Lee to finish it.
Aww that's okay DC, maybe next year you can reboot the whole line again and get four months at the number one spot.So, I guess the number 1 reboot thing was enough to give DC 3 months as the number 1 comics company. Marvel's back on top again.
I don't know how many people are like me but the whole thing turned me off of DC more than anything.
Static's has a title at LEAST 4 times. His original run, his first DC run, then he was in the Teen Titans for awhile, then he had a second DC run. This makes 4.From iFan "DC will cancel six titles, so we still end up with a straight 52, which has been a hell of a marketing term for them. Readers can say goodbye to the following titles with their eighth issues:
Blackhawks, Hawk & Dove, Men of War, Mister Terrific, O.M.A.C., and Static Shock."
If I'm reading this right DC will only have 52 titles at any one given time? And Static Shock had a title? Wow.
If they weren't we'd be torching DC headquarters right now...All the Green Lantern titles sadly are the same way (previous continuities) so it's been frustrating too.
It would be a particularly stupid move seeing as the Green Lantern runs starting with the Light War have been the best that DC has produced in decades.If they weren't we'd be torching DC headquarters right now...
You're not biased or anything there, are you, Mr. Hal Jordan Impersonator?It would be a particularly stupid move seeing as the Green Lantern runs starting with the Light War have been the best that DC has produced in decades.
As much as I hated them bringing back all the silver age incarnations just because, the Green Lantern titles have been consistently good.
Let's just put it this way. I've never bought any comic book swag sort of stuff before. I got those rings pretty much solely on the fact that those stories were some of the best comics I've ever read.You're not biased or anything there, are you, Mr. Hal Jordan Impersonator?
*Yes, I know that's actually Krona
Actually i'm pretty sure that if the criminals he was using as meat shields started killing aryans Hitler would be pretty pissed too...Remember when Sinestro was a horrible villain who controlled his planet like Hitler controlled Berlin (not a Godwin, this was an actual allusion)? Neither does Geoff Johns.
They also had someone that goes by Rob drawing it... i think someone at DC thinks the same about Hawk and Dove...Wait, wait, wait, wait.
Hawk and Dove was cancelled?
Actually, that's been the focal point of Sinestro in a Green Lantern uniform returning to his home planet and being confronted with just that...so I'd say he remembers fairly well...Remember when Sinestro was a horrible villain who controlled his planet like Hitler controlled Berlin (not a Godwin, this was an actual allusion)? Neither does Geoff Johns.
War of the Green Lanterns was the last big GL event before the new 52 and contains the most important things relevant to the post-flashpoint GL (i.e. Sinestro as a Green Lantern again, Death of Mogo, everything involving the Guardians, etc.).The thing that's most upsetting for me, is that the GL titles are what I look forward to the most and I have NO idea where I should start to get the full back story.
I haven't read ANYTHING GL before 52 (other than wiki entries) and everytime I ask the question, I'm told I need to go back about 10yrs and hundreds of dollars. Something about the prophecy of the multiple light spectrums, then the actual Blackest Night/Brightest Day series which is broken up into so many different books I'd have no idea how to follow it.
Yeah, the 10 year thing is kinda unavoidable, but you can skip the dollars part easy...I haven't read ANYTHING GL before 52 (other than wiki entries) and everytime I ask the question, I'm told I need to go back about 10yrs and hundreds of dollars. Something about the prophecy of the multiple light spectrums, then the actual Blackest Night/Brightest Day series which is broken up into so many different books I'd have no idea how to follow it.
As i recall that's actually kinda late... you need to start a bit earlier, when the first of the other lantern corps shows up... i'm not sure if it's Sinetro War or even earlier then that...I guess I'd mostly like to start at the Blackest Night series with one big collected trade that covers the majority of what I need to know, then Brightest Day, then War then 52.
Well i myself started with Sinestro War back when it came out, so i'm not sure... of course that was way after i learned a lot of backstory stuff from wiki, which helps...See, I have Rebirth and I still felt kind of lost.
I read up on the past (How Kyle, Guy, Stewart became Lanterns and the whole Paralaxx storyline) on wikis but I was wondering if that was really the point I should have started on. After Rebirth can I just get large collected trades on Sinestro Wars? Is that the next step?
Yeah, but it's Liefeld Lobo.So I'm annoyed. I was loving the new 52 Run of Deathstroke but then of course came the announcement of Liefeld coming in on issue #9 so I told my comic book shop to stop my pull at #8.
So what's Deathstroke#9 going to be about?
Deathstroke vs Lobo.
FML
Google image search says it looks like this:Yeah, but it's Liefeld Lobo.
I don't want to even know what that looks like.
Honestly, I don't think his work on the 1988 Hawk & Dove mini or pre-X-Force in general was that bad. As seen here. The problems seem to have started after New Mutants rose up through the sales charts under his pencils and he became a star.I still want to know how that guy ever got a career in comics....
He is a case of right place right time, he hit at a time when new art styles were the popular thing. I really loved his jeans ad where he admitted to having no formal training... and was proud of that.I still want to know how that guy ever got a career in comics...
What are you talking about, if I may?I refuse to buy World's Finest with the shit job they did on Power Girl (and I'm not even talking about the lack of boob window).
Pretty much. They're your standard volumes they sell, putting a few issues together into a trade. Just thought I'd post it up for anyone that was waiting for the volumes to be sold before going in.I'm guessing this is just a collection of the first few issues?
I don't know, I only read the peripheral bat-books (Batwing, Red Hood, Nightwing, Birds of Prey, and Batgirl) and I think they've done an excellent job keeping each story self contained. Each hero/team fights a different Talon, each book gives you the information you need to understand the Court of Owls, and each series features its protagonist triumphing over their Talon. No "Follow Red Hood to Batman: Dark Knight #9!" foolishness in sight.So far have 1-9 of everything I'm interested in. However I'm going be dropping another 4 or so from my pull list. I'm really turned off by this whole "Court of Owls" thing. I hate cross-overs that make you buy from a series you don't read at all, or worse, buy entire side comic sets to get the story. I want to follow my character, I want to buy her series and not have to buy anythingelse to see what happens to her.
Wonder Woman, OMAC, Aquaman, Firestorm, Deathstroke, Batwing, Suicide Squad, generally most of the B-Level titles.For someone getting into the new 52 with these volumes, which ones would you recommend?
If Nick dropped a Superman book, you know it has to be terrible.
L...lll...liiieeessss... ^hic^The Epic Story of One Man, Facing his Troubles as he Realizes he's not actually an Alien, but it's all part of his alcohol-induced hallucinations.
That was my reaction... Um... Jade and Obsidian?What's funny is that Alan Scott had a gay son in prior to the New 52. Oh well, if they even bother, they'll probably just have Thorn rape him or something so they can still have Obsidian. Because who gives a fuck about Jade, amirite?
That depends. It takes about six months (or at least it did in the 90's, it may be less than that now but it's presumably still at least four) to take a comic from start to finish. Northstar has been out and proud for twenty plus years, a major character in X-Books on and off for about a decade. When did Marvel start hinting at his upcoming wedding?So, after much speculation, they've revealed which iconic DC character is gay (in a totally non-exploitational way, comics don't do that kind of thing).
It's the Earth 2 version of the Green Lantern no one gives a shit about, Alan Scott.
I dunno, maybe I'm just being cynical but it really does seem more like a me-too thing with the Marvel Northstar deal going on right now than an actual honest to goodness stab at making a non-stereotypical gay character.
The thing is that it is editorial making a big deal of this. Based on the promo page they released, while it is a "big reveal" in the issue itself, it's not a "big deal" in the long run. The character is gay, out of the closet, and has a boyfriend - it's the reader for whom this is a big change. Like The Flash's connection to the Roman Gods , the deaths of the Trinity, and Kendra Saunders being the first Hawkgirl, this is just another one of the differences on new Earth-2.Why is this even an issue? We already have great gay DC characters, who's sexual orientation isn't really that much of a defining characteristic for them ANYWAY. Why do they feel the need to "reveal" established ones that no one cares about as being gay as well? It's clearly meant to drive sales and the long time fans know this.
None of the Infinity, Inc. generation exist. Jay Garrick just graduated from college for goodness sake, his peers can't have adult children. If anything, the new Alan Scott is gay precisely because of Pre-Flashpoint Obsidian.What's funny is that Alan Scott had a gay son in prior to the New 52. Oh well, if they even bother, they'll probably just have Thorn rape him or something so they can still have Obsidian. Because who gives a fuck about Jade, amirite?
I love the Justice Society, but they could have chosen so many other characters that would make more sense. Alan Scott is actually my favorite character from that era and I feel one of the few who kept relevant in the mainstream universe as well. Obviously, I'm not at issue with more gay characters, but really, why make Alan Scott gay?And please knock it off with the "no cares about the Justice Society" crap. I get that you're saying that the mainstream isn't familiar with them and that Alan Scott isn't who most people think of when people think Green Lantern, however the Justice Society had their own series from August 1999 to October 2011 (with a four month gap between the October 2006 JSA #81 and the February 2007 Justice Society of America #1 to break the stride), not counting the multiple spin-off minis and on-goings. The team has fans, dammit.
If I'm being cynical, I'd say it is to take the place of Obsidian on the list of gay DC characters. If I'm being optimistic, I'd say its because this is a New Earth-2 which is re-imagining all the JSA characters and their origins. The shortest is: I don't know yet. Alan Scott appeared on all of two pages in the first issue.I love the Justice Society, but they could have chosen so many other characters that would make more sense. Alan Scott is actually my favorite character from that era and I feel one of the few who kept relevant in the mainstream universe as well. Obviously, I'm not at issue with more gay characters, but really, why make Alan Scott gay?
There are literally two titles handling alternate universes on any sort of regular basis - Earth-2 (which says in the title that it's a different earth) and World's Finest (which is about two refugees from Earth-2 living in the mainstream DCnU, no more confusing than time travelers or aliens). The only time alternate universes become remotely confusing to new readers is when they become required reading to understand what's going on in the "mainstream" universe, and even then its not that confusing if it's written properly. Comics have had the concept of "multiverses" and "imaginary stories" for something like sixty years. They will NEVER go away. Even when DC said "No More Mulitverse!", it took about ten years for them to decide "But there is Hypertime" and half that for them to say "Elseworlds are OK too".Why... THE FUCK... are they adding in alternate universes? They already admitted that the idea behind those things was just fucking confusing for new readers.
Anyone more familiar with the JSA in the reboot able to give me some idea of the point of it now?
Yeah, Flashpoint was terrible, but there are some really strong titles going on right now. Wonder Woman has been really good, most of the 'dark' titles (JL Dark, Animal Man, Swamp Thing), Aquaman...I've dropped DC entirely over this. I've tried reading Flashpoint, but I just HATED it.
Its not just that Star Fire is slutty its that her original nice personality has pretty much vanished!Starfire has always been slutty, and Barry's mom was killed when Geoff Johns brought him back before the relaunch (difference being the book is good now).
Wally and Donna is funny.
True I meant she's mean now! Unlikable, abhorrent, generally despicable. The old Star Fire had her problems but at least she was likable.You mean her "I'm so bubbly until I decide someone needs to be murdered, don't judge me by your moral standards, that's the Tameranian way!"? Yea. Starfire's a nutter. Always has been.
Batman, GL and Flash basically didn't change from where they where before Flashpoint, they just got some slight retcons...and Barry's mom was killed when Geoff Johns brought him back before the relaunch (difference being the book is good now).
Uh, Aquaman hasn't rocked the beard since about 2001.Does anyone else find beardless Aquaman weird? For the past couple years Aquaman has been a swarthy bearded man and now he's back to Golden Age clean shave? Not a complaint, just weird to me is all.
No your right, I'm thinking of the cartoons. I personally he looks cooler with the beard, but I can deal.Uh, Aquaman hasn't rocked the beard since about 2001.
Uh...hard to say. Beast Boy really hasn't had much to do, so he's coming off as pretty bland thus far in Ravagers.In the comic Animal Man is in " The Ravagers" Beast boy is just red right? They didn't fuck with his personality and character development right? RIGHT?!
DAMMIT! And I knew about "The Red" but I still think its weird that Beast Boy is red because of that. Not because he looks different, but the fact that he is red similar to Animal Man's "The Red" it signifies that Beast Boy is Animal Man's side-kick. Wasn't he a full on super-hero a few years ago by the name of Changeling? It feels kind-of like he's devolved.Uh...hard to say. Beast Boy really hasn't had much to do, so he's coming off as pretty bland thus far in Ravagers.
True, but for me when young DC comic supers gain an adult tital it feels like they've gone through a right of passage. Like they are there own hero now. Just my opinion is all.He became Changeling because he kinda got too old to be calling himself Beast Boy. That's really all it comes down to and it's why most incarnations (Teen Titans, Young Justice, etc) still use Beast Boy.
....How so? In the mythology they're building, The Red is the spiritual connection between all animals (red like blood, I think was the idea) and The Green* is the connection between all plant life (which has been around since late 80's Swamp Thing, I think). Beast Boy (a name that they went back to using circa 2000, incidentally) being red denotes him as Animal Man's sidekick about as much as Poison Ivy being covered in green plant life makes her Swamp Thing's. There's no connection between the two except that their powers flow from the same supernatural source, albeit in very different ways.DAMMIT! And I knew about "The Red" but I still think its weird that Beast Boy is red because of that. Not because he looks different, but the fact that he is red similar to Animal Man's "The Red" it signifies that Beast Boy is Animal Man's side-kick. Wasn't he a full on super-hero a few years ago by the name of Changeling? It feels kind-of like he's devolved.
Phantom Stranger was abyssal, and Team 7 just has me looking forward to having the chance to read a book with Black Canary that isn't complete and utter shit. So far it's up in the air, although better than BoP, which it would have to work hard to be worse.I found Animal Man to be very "meh". Batman by Scott Snyder, on the hand, lives up to the hype. Earth 2 is crazy good, but I've been a giant JSA fan since I was eight so there's likely a bias at play.
Oh, Wave Three started last month. Team 7 #0 and Sword of Sorcery #0 had strong potential, but neither really slapped me in the face and grabbed my attention.
I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. While Birds of Prey hasn't exactly been A-#1, I've been enjoying it. I dig all that undercover covert ops shit and was happy to see Black Canary "return" to it (in the Golden Age, she briefly had the schtick of going undercover and busting up gangs from the inside - its part of why she dresses like she does or so I'm told) so I might be a bit biased. I loved Birds of Prey #0:Phantom Stranger was abyssal, and Team 7 just has me looking forward to having the chance to read a book with Black Canary that isn't complete and utter shit. So far it's up in the air, although better than BoP, which it would have to work hard to be worse.
1) I am looking forward to this book.There's going to be a Superman title worth reading
Seriously, how do you manage to botch your number 1 property?
But I don't think Beast Boy's powers came from the red originally. Bitten by a mutant green monkey and and then healed and then got shape-changing powers and what not. His powers were more mad science than mystical force. I guess tying him to "the Red" makes sense, but I still think its a stretch.....How so? In the mythology they're building, The Red is the spiritual connection between all animals (red like blood, I think was the idea) and The Green* is the connection between all plant life (which has been around since late 80's Swamp Thing, I think). Beast Boy (a name that they went back to using circa 2000, incidentally) being red denotes him as Animal Man's sidekick about as much as Poison Ivy being covered in green plant life makes her Swamp Thing's. There's no connection between the two except that their powers flow from the same supernatural source, albeit in very different ways.
hmm, how to explain this. COMICS CHANGE! Jason Todd doesn't have red hair, and Superman's parents are dead (again).But I don't think Beast Boy's powers came from the red originally. Bitten by a mutant green monkey and and then healed and then got shape-changing powers and what not. His powers were more mad science than mystical force. I guess tying him to "the Red" makes sense, but I still think its a stretch.
His new origin is still mad science (experimented on, metagene activated and connected him to The Red) but it links in to the greater mythology of the DCnU. And since The Red is, as I understand, a brand new concept...yeah, he wasn't tied to The Red previously because it didn't exist previously. Now Beast Boy, Animal Man, and (presumably) Vixen all draw their power from the same source. This gets down to a measure of taste, but I actually rather like that. Instead of three heroes with largely unconnected (although it was later "revealed" that Vixen and Animal Man's powers were tied into the same source) but very similar powers, we now have three heroes who each draw on the same energy field and use it differently.But I don't think Beast Boy's powers came from the red originally. Bitten by a mutant green monkey and and then healed and then got shape-changing powers and what not. His powers were more mad science than mystical force. I guess tying him to "the Red" makes sense, but I still think its a stretch.
He went by Beast Boy from 1965 to 1980 (15 years, though he admittedly saw use sparingly during that period) and from 2000-present. That's 27 years and counting. He went by Changeling from 1980 to 2000, twenty years. Of course, he saw a lot more regular use during his 20 years as Changeling than he did during his first 15 years as Beast Boy.Also, I think that he went by Changeling longer than he did Beast Boy in the original DC universe.
The Great Fables crossover soured me on the series.This is somewhat unrelated, but I didn't feel like making a whole new thread for this:
The Unwritten, one of my favourite comic book series, will soon feature characters from another Vertigo title: Fables. Yeah, a crossover.
This honestly bothers me. The reason I pick up Vertigo titles or self-contained titles is because it's one creative team with (usually) an end in mind. Which is why I dropped Fables long ago. It started turning from this great series into a franchise, with spin-off titles and, ugh, crossovers. I shouldn't have to go from Volume 12 to Volume 13 of Fables and require reading Volume whatever of Spin Off Title #3.
Unwritten's writer, Mike Carey, has stated his has an end goal in mind for the series. And it's really one of the best books out there (like Fables once was). But if it's going to require knowledge of current events in Fables? I'm out. I'm done. I'll sell my copies of Unwritten and say fuck it.
The first arc was pretty so-so (felt kind of rushed) but the Villain's Journey was pretty good...though come to think of it, the ending felt a little rushed on that one too. So mostly so-so, but the Shazam back-up is great (in my opinion).How was the first Justice League comic from the new Reboot? I heard mixed reviews.
Good to know. By the way, is Captain Marvel really just called Shazam now? That I find really really weird.The first arc was pretty so-so (felt kind of rushed) but the Villain's Journey was pretty good...though come to think of it, the ending felt a little rushed on that one too. So mostly so-so, but the Shazam back-up is great (in my opinion).
He's called Shazam now, because he's more explicitly the wizard's replacement as protector of Earth. And because DC will never get the trademark to "Captain Marvel" back from Marvel and they are therefore legally obligated to title/advertise anything the character stars in (comics, tv, movies, video games, anything) "Shazam" anyway. May as well call the character by a name they can advertise.Good to know. By the way, is Captain Marvel really just called Shazam now? That I find really really weird.
Edit: I mean Black Adam uses Shazam. Mary Marvel used Shazam. Are they Shazam now too? Its just weird to me.
....seriously? Captain Marvel has been called Captain Marvel for over 60 years and NOW Marvel is pulling the plug.He's called Shazam now, because he's more explicitly the wizard's replacement as protector of Earth. And because DC will never get the trademark to "Captain Marvel" back from Marvel and they are therefore legally obligated to title/advertise anything the character stars in (comics, tv, movies, video games, anything) "Shazam" anyway. May as well call the character by a name they can advertise.
Marvel has the entirety of the Disney legal team behind them. DC only has the Warner Bros.....seriously? Captain Marvel has been called Captain Marvel for over 60 years and NOW Marvel is pulling the plug.
DAMN STRAIGHT! Its about a kid who can magically turn into an adult super-hero, kids would love that!And DC needs to get off their ass and give Captain Marvel a kid-friendly movie or TV show.
Kids HAVE loved that. Captain Marvel used to sell more issues than Superman. In the Golden Age. Elvis Presley stole his hair and wore it like that for years. By all rights and privileges Captain Marvel should still be as well known as Superman, but Marvel basically put the kibosh on that and prevented DC from properly using the character for decades.DAMN STRAIGHT! Its about a kid who can magically turn into an adult super-hero, kids would love that!
....Elvis ripped off his hair cut? ELVIS?! So thanks to Marvel, a beloved pop-culture icon was dashed for ripping of a name that he had years before them. I. Fucking. Hate. CORPORATIONS!Kids HAVE loved that. Captain Marvel used to sell more issues than Superman. In the Golden Age. Elvis Presley stole his hair and wore it like that for years. By all rights and privileges Captain Marvel should still be as well known as Superman, but Marvel basically put the kibosh on that and prevented DC from properly using the character for decades.
Well it was actually Captain Marvel Jr., but the point still stands.....Elvis ripped off his hair cut? ELVIS?! So thanks to Marvel, a beloved pop-culture icon was dashed for ripping of a name that he had years before them. I. Fucking. Hate. CORPORATIONS!
I don't know, DC kinda fucked things up on their end too, i mean Bats stars in Detective Comics and Supes in Action Comics, why they didn't just make an X Comics for Captain Marvel always puzzled me, would have avoided the I Am Not Shazam thing easily that way.Kids HAVE loved that. Captain Marvel used to sell more issues than Superman. In the Golden Age. Elvis Presley stole his hair and wore it like that for years. By all rights and privileges Captain Marvel should still be as well known as Superman, but Marvel basically put the kibosh on that and prevented DC from properly using the character for decades.
That actually doesn't really matter, what matters is that Marvel keeps using the Cpt. Marvel on a book every time the trademark is getting close to expiring, which is why atm there's no Ms. Marvel running around, but Carol has her own book.Marvel has the entirety of the Disney legal team behind them. DC only has the Warner Bros.
No, that plug was pulled forty-five years ago, when Captain Mar-Vell debuted. There's been at least a one-shot or mini starring one of their Captains Marvel every few years ever since. When DC did revive the original character, it was in a comic entitled "Shazam!". When the character got a TV show in the seventies, it was "Shazam!". DC holds the copyright to their version of the character, they can still call him Captain Marvel, there's nothing new here on Marvel's part. DC is simply tired of having a character whose name they can't use to promote him.....seriously? Captain Marvel has been called Captain Marvel for over 60 years and NOW Marvel is pulling the plug.
Well, they're playing up the "troubled orphan" angle a little more with the reboot, but he's still good hearted and relatively smiley in the actual stories (Billy got the power in Justice League #0, so we've only seen an issue's worth of him as Shazam). At least I think, but my copy is in East Lansing at MSU with my sister right now.And I just looked at what Captain Marvel looks like now...what the fuck? Why does he look like Altair ? Not just the cloak but the stoic face he's giving. I admit to not being that knowledgeable of Captain Marvel but from what I remember he was a nice smiley man. Reboots are fucking weird.
That's a change that should have happened years ago, in my opinion. A Skrull imposter got to use the name before she did.That actually doesn't really matter, what matters is that Marvel keeps using the Cpt. Marvel on a book every time the trademark is getting close to expiring, which is why atm there's no Ms. Marvel running around, but Carol has her own book.
Didn't it already happen once? I always assumed it did at some point (then again Monica and Phylla where created for the name, so i guess maybe not).That's a change that should have happened years ago, in my opinion. A Skrull imposter got to use the name before she did.
Only in "House of M".Didn't it already happen once? I always assumed it did at some point (then again Monica and Phylla where created for the name, so i guess maybe not).
Pfft- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh lord that is the most desperate ploy for money I've heard from a comics company this hour. And whats even funnier is that you know there's gonna be at least a hundred guys who buy every single variant cover. Oh man, its like the 90s are alive and well.There will be fifty-two variant covers for Justice League of America #1. Which is the stupidest gorram thing I've heard in a while. On the other hand, both Katanna and Vibe will be getting solo books. Which is both pretty cool (I personally love to see more obscure characters get a chance at a solo series) and kind of stupid. Katanna might have some heat from her recent stint in Birds of Prey and her upcoming appearances in "Beware The Batman!" (she'll be Batman's sidekick there), but Vibe...he's the "joke" of the Justice League Detroit era. I'm skeptical about his revival at all, much less giving him a solo series.
Uh...why is that something so terrible? This is the "second string" team, after all and Catwoman hasn't been a "villain" for at least twenty years now.Wait, CATWOMAN in the JLA? I'm so glad I don't follow DC anymore.
....where the hell have you been? She's been an anti-hero for like- YEARS!Wait, CATWOMAN in the JLA? I'm so glad I don't follow DC anymore.
A goodly chunk of this Justice League consists of anti-heroes:I know she's an anti-hero. That's exactly why she shouldn't be in the JLA. It would like Marvel putting the Punisher in the Avengers.
Justice League Dark is an awesome series and the sex is well in their past at this point. John kind of accidentally got Zatara killed in the DCnU. That puts a slight damper on any relationship.John Constantine leading a Justice League is the stupidest thing ever and whoever thought it up should be ashamed of themselves. How are he and Zatanna supposed to have magically drugged fueled sex when they have other guys roaming around their place?
I'm thinking your blanket dismissal of 77 distinct ongoings or minis, some of which haven't even come out yet, as "balls" might be coming from a place more of emotion than reason.Yeah, I'm sticking with my original stance. The reboot is balls.
Eeeeeeeeeh, I think I have to disagree there. Crisis had lots of characters from the other universes needlessly killed just to declutter the DC comics continuity. Sure they justified it by saying that all the alternate characters merged into one character, but in the end they were really just the versions of the characters that people liked the best.No, it didn't. Crisis, Zero Hour, etc didn't completely jettison the histories, it just used the events to merge convergent histories together. It was no where near the complete flushing away that occurred with the reboot.
He looks a lazily designed luchadore. And when DC screws up a Green Lantern luchadore , quite possibly one of the coolest sounding things I can think of right now- THEY SCREW UP!Ick, Green Lantern's costume looks like ass.
So its pretty much the exact same thing as one of the big two did a while ago, where you could buy a particular issue of something (I forget what) with the name of your LCS on the front. not really too surprised there. anyone remember that?Well that's disappointingly plain. Fifty two variant covers...really just one cover Photoshopped a lot.
That's Oliver. They've aged him down quite a bit. He's like the age of his pre-reboot son now. Incidentally, February will see him lose his fortune and company. Perhaps a return to the character's strengths is on the way.Wait, is that Green Arrow supposed to be Ollie, or Speedy?
Well....I'm going to read it. Since they're not giving Cyborg an ongoing (for some reason, making him the only one of the new big seven without one), I'll take whatever Detroiter headlining a comic I can get. I just about messed my pants when the new Jay Garrick turned out to be from Lansing (meaning he may even be an MSU grad).• No, that’s not a typo. Vibe stars in his own ongoing monthly title, starting with this debut issue cowritten by GEOFF JOHNS!
• One of the most unlikely members of the Justice League of America ever (okay, THE most unlikely) will soon discover he’s one of the most powerful individuals on Earth. But how did Vibe get his abilities? What is the cost to them? And why does the JLA want him on the team so desperately?
• Plus: We’ve seen the Red Room and the Black Room, but what is...the Circus?
My literal home town, Livonia (a Detroit suburb), was the place the entity of Hope roosted after Blackest Night. The artwork was amusingly divorced for reality (imagine suburban sprawl, just miles of subdivisions with businesses along the major roads...that's us - we're literally in zoning textbooks) but it was a cool shout out nonetheless.Hey, at least you GET heroes from your home town. The only Ohioian in DC comics is Black Alice and she's basically a villain. If I want a native hero team, I have to go to the web comic Spinnerette.
The (technically non-canon) Atlas of the DC Universe from 1990 said that Gotham City is located in New Jersey. So depending on the writer, you have the entire Bat-Family.At least you guys HAVE real super heroes representing your states. When was the last non-comedy New Jersey based super hero? Not that many.
Edit: Feel free to correct me, I would be so okay with being wrong on this.
I'LL TAKE IT! Sure that means we also have the Joker, but WHO CARES! BATMAN!The (technically non-canon) Atlas of the DC Universe from 1990 said that Gotham City is located in New Jersey. So depending on the writer, you have the entire Bat-Family.
Who do we have from the upper peninsula of Michigan? No one, that's who.
Though, we're mistaken for Canadians so often, I'm claiming Alpha Flight and Wolverine.
True, but what's up there that's worth protecting? Michigan Tech and Oswald's Bear Ranch?Who do we have from the upper peninsula of Michigan? No one, that's who.
Though, we're mistaken for Canadians so often, I'm claiming Alpha Flight and Wolverine.
I don't know about the upper peninsula, but Guy Gardner is from Michigan.Who do we have from the upper peninsula of Michigan? No one, that's who.
Though, we're mistaken for Canadians so often, I'm claiming Alpha Flight and Wolverine.
Actually, he's from Baltimore but went to school at the University of Michigan. Cyborg (in the DCnU) is from Detroit, Vibe is from Detroit, Gypsy might be from Michigan (her origin has her be a suburbanite who ran away from home on a one-way to Detroit...she could be a Grand Rapidian, an Ohioan, or from anywhere), and DCnU Jay "The Flash" Garrick is from Lansing. Marvel briefly had Peter David's X-Factor team based out of the D as well, though they were all non-natives.I don't know about the upper peninsula, but Guy Gardner is from Michigan.
YJ has had a nearly unprecedented* level of access to characters - Wonder Woman, Wonder Girl, Captain Marvel, Black Adam, Icon, Rocket, etc. - that had previously been somewhat inaccessible. The blame for Young Justice's delays rest squarely on the shoulders of Cartoon Network.These days, my favourite rendition of the DCU is Young Justice. Apparently, I'm not alone in this feeling.
Which is probably why DC is seemingly trying to do away with the show.
and maybe he be brought back with personality.Don't all DC comic book characters need to die at some point?
Is it really something to quit over when i'm sure that he will be resurrected in the near future.
In Justice League and Justice League Unlimited the Green Lantern is an interesting character with a (rather dull and boring) power ring who happens to be named John Stewart.Justice League and Justice League Unlimited managed it.
I think the issue here isn't the writer coming up with a story that involves the death of a hero but rather that the writer is being told by editorial that they have to kill a hero. One is a creative evolution that may or may not lead to a good story and the other is a directive designed 100% to gain a short term boost in sales.Don't all DC comic book characters need to die at some point?
Is it really something to quit over when i'm sure that he will be resurrected in the near future.
FTFYDon't allDCcomic book characters need to die at some point?
I know this is a really old post, but wasn't Punisher made into some Dark Avenger at some point? Leading an X-Factor style team of Avengers for wetwork ops or something.I know she's an anti-hero. That's exactly why she shouldn't be in the JLA. It would like Marvel putting the Punisher in the Avengers.
Good write-up Nick. I like your thinking.
They are terrible.Also in your article I see you mention the Earth-1 books, are those good? I heard good stuff.
In the second book Superman encourages murder, and Batman Earth One suffers from the movie problem of Batman is against killing, unless someone does it for him.I don't think DC has come out and said for sure that there are only 52 Earths in this new continuity. They tried that with the reboot and it didn't work very well at all. It's better not to think about it too much.
As far as the Earth 1 books, I've only read the first Superman one. And didn't like it very much. The villain was incredibly cliche whose only purpose was to give Superman something to hit at the end. I've heard some good things about the second book, though. And the Batman one is supposed to be good, but I can't look past artist Gary Frank's work. Whenever someone's mouth is open, all of his characters look like they're ancestors of squirrels or something.
I've never read a Lobo comic or have had any exposure to him beyond him being voiced by Brad Garret in Superman and Justice League but yeah, if that's the case, I guess so.Well Lobo's basic idea was a parody of the 90s hyperviolent comics, so if you were to update him to modern comics I really can't think of what other than that image would suit him.
No. DC comics doesn't believe in women.Lobo is supposed to be a bad-ass space biker who rides a hog and gets into bar fights, right? This guy looks like he'd ride the space equivalent of one of those Japanese motocylcles that puts your ass over your head, and use it to get to various... swim... meets. Is this guy suppoed to tap into the Free! fanbase or something?
X
No, but the Animal Man and Swamp Thing books are "interestingly horrifying". They intertwine quite a bit and I love the idea of the balance between the three life forces of the planet, The Red, The Green, and The Rot.Has anyone read those new Dial H for Hero comics? They look interestingly horrifying.
I picked up the first trade while back. Read...most of it. I don't know. It wasn't bad, but it just didn't keep me engaged enough to finish it. The writing is honestly kinda sloppy at points, likely because it's China Mieville's first foray into writing comics. The transition from prose to comic script can't be easy.Has anyone read those new Dial H for Hero comics? They look interestingly horrifying.
Batman Beyond is supposedly back on the table right now and it might be the next Batman solo film. We'll see what happens with it.I'm surprised, but I almost agree with Kurtz on this one:
"I’m on board with Affleck as Batman only IF by Batman you mean Terry McGinnis. Eastwood as Bruce Wayne. Batman Beyond movie is past due."
Affleck is too old to play Terry, but I still like the idea of a Batman Beyond movie.
I don't think any of those events happened in the new continuity, except maybe Green Lantern, since it was the only book to keep going as normal? DC probably has no clue, either, and more than likely doesn't care.Really, I have to give Kudos for the team on Animal Man, they have managed to pretty perfectly merge the Vertigo and Mainstream Animal Man into a cohesive character and didn't chuck any of the continuity, per se (the entire Grant Morrison run is a dream in the new continuity).
Speaking of which, what events actually happened in the new continuity? Crisis on Infinite Earths, Zero Hour, Infinite Crisis, Countdown and Final Crisis. Did those happen or not?
I haven't been reading it, but hear it starts out well enough but becomes less enjoyable as the team membership changes. I think that's what I heard.So, I'm through the Rotworld series on Animal Man and Swamp thing. Has anyone read Justice League Dark? That sounds pretty good in theory.
Damn straight. Having different standards of modesty and physical affection than those on Earth is one thing. It's another thing to completely forget about your friends when one of your defining characteristics was your love and caring.There's a huge difference between a sexually liberated character and one that is portrayed as a cum dumpster.
Depends on how well Red Robin takes as a character. The "sidekick upgrades always stick" rule was broken when they made Oracle into Batgirl again, so it's definitely possible.Meh... You still need that:
- Tim Drake goes back to being Robin.
- They don't introduce a new Robin.
Except they've been doing it for years. Harley Quinn joined canon a long time ago and is a break-out character. Mr. Freeze's back story has been using the DCAU version since it was first introduced because it was simply better than his original one. Renee Montoya started as an inconsequential side character in the DCAU and was (for a time) a big name hero in her own right, both as herself and as The Question.It also doesn't help that they're trying to mix the animated universe mythos with the comic book mythos, which are two very different things.
I actually like Tim Drake in Batman Beyond though. He's in his 50's and has basically done everything he can to pull himself away from a life that almost got him killed (or worse). In doing so, he has found the kind of life that Bruce never could: happily married, doing a job he enjoys. Quite literally, out of everyone in the Bat Family, the only ones with any kind of happiness in their life are Tim and possibly Barbara and that is because they got out of it. It's the positive message that heroes CAN stop if it becomes too much... that they aren't their hero identities.And completely destroying Tim Drake as a character.
N52 Nightwing is surprisingly good. The whole traveling with Haley Circus around the country solving crimes bad tv premise that they were suggesting was the book, was really just an arc. Not so much solving crimes as solving a particular crime. That involved the circus. The books been generally solid, and Kyle Higgins has a good handle on writing Dick.[DOUBLEPOST=1377610685,1377610411][/DOUBLEPOST]I do have to admit that I haven't really read any of the Bat Family books since Battle for the Cowl.
You're getting a bonus like for Jim Aparo.Not sure if you are responding to my last post Bowie, but A Lonely Place of Dying was Tim's origin story back in the early nineties. Totally worth picking up if you are into Tim Drake. Plus Jim Aparo!
I was responding to Covar's post. I read the Batman related books pretty heavily in that era.Not sure if you are responding to my last post Bowie, but A Lonely Place of Dying was Tim's origin story back in the early nineties. Totally worth picking up if you are into Tim Drake. Plus Jim Aparo!
Oh, I only have them as separate trades. You know, the funny thing about Jim Aparo, his art... it's not my favorite style, his men all kind of look the same and everyone looks rigid but... for some reason... I'm just drawn to anything he does. Even when those little details bug me he just... I dunno, he just DOES comic book art. And it's perfect.N52 Nightwing is surprisingly good. The whole traveling with Haley Circus around the country solving crimes bad tv premise that they were suggesting was the book, was really just an arc. Not so much solving crimes as solving a particular crime. That involved the circus. The books been generally solid, and Kyle Higgins has a good handle on writing Dick.[DOUBLEPOST=1377610685,1377610411][/DOUBLEPOST]
You're getting a bonus like for Jim Aparo.
A Lonely Place of Dying tends to get bundled in trades with Death in the Family, and I believe that is the case with the current Death in the Family trade in print.
Ehhhh, she might have started as a publicity stunt (due to how DC's PR department promoted her), but when the character was actually introduced, she was a really great, well-rounded character. You can thank Greg Rucka for that, who has a history of writing really great, fleshed out women characters.Considering Batwoman's just a publicity stunt I'm honestly surprised that they didn't want her to have a wedding.
Wow, then you're really missing out. Her solo book is fantastic. And honestly, she has really, really loose ties with the Bat Family. She's not a part of crossovers and her solo book rarely has any appearances with the rest of the Bat Family.She was nothing but terrible in 52, and I'd actually care to read her book if she was actually a part of the Bat Family.
Harley Quinn, nude and about to commit suicide.PANEL 4
Harley sitting naked in a bathtub with toasters, blow dryers, blenders, appliances all dangling above the bathtub and she has a cord that will release them all. We are watching the moment before the inevitable death. Her expression is one of “oh well, guess that’s it for me” and she has resigned herself to the moment that is going to happen.
Are you sure you don't mean Countdown? Her comic in 52 was one of my favorite parts of 52.She was nothing but terrible in 52, and I'd bother to read her book if she was actually a part of the Bat Family.
I didn't know the Creeper was a villain.Speaking of DC wankery, this month is "Villains Month"with a ton of variant cover comics with 3D motion covers.
It's like the 90s all over again. Why is DC trying to revive the worst age in comic book history?
I think he's a villain in the same way that Deadpool is a hero.I didn't know the Creeper was a villain.
You mean this contest?Holy crap. What the hell DC.
Well good on Palmiotti for owning up to the mistake and apologizing but editorial should've looked it over before this went public. It speaks volumes that no-one there stopped and said , "Uh hey guys... is this panel with her nude and about to commit suicide in a tub really appropriate?"First, Batwoman's amazing creative team is leaving because DC didn't want the main character to get married. Not because it was a same-sex marriage, but because they want all their heroes to be swinging singles.
Now they have even more controversy:
http://multiversitycomics.com/news/artists-respond-dcs-harley-quinn-contest/
Last week, DC offered up a contest to break into comics by drawing a page for the upcoming “Harley Quinn” #0, which would feature multiple artists auditioning to Harley directly to be her new artist. The scene, whose intention was to be a humorous portrayal of events in Harley’s life, featured Harley contemplating suicide by various different fashions for four different panels, including one in which she was naked in the bath — and naturally, some people didn’t find it so funny.
Bad week to be a female character in the DC universe.
Yeah, her and Lex kinda did get the shaft. The only appearance of him was the Golden Age cover with him punched through a brick wall. I wouldn't have minded maybe a reference to him elected President.Lois kinda got the shaft there.
Watching that made me realize that I've read way more Superman than I thought I had.The Superman 75th Anniversary short has been released.
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/10/...story-in-a-2-minute-animated-short-exclusive/
No kidding. I get that DC hates marriage right now, so they didn't include the wedding of Clark Kent and Lois Lane (which was a pretty damn big moment in Superman history), but have they completely forgotten what an amazing character Lois Lane is? She's the one who gave Superman his name, for goodness sake!Lois kinda got the shaft there.
Zack Snyder was involved, can you really be surprised they left out one of the greatest female characters in comics?No kidding. I get that DC hates marriage right now, so they didn't include the wedding of Clark Kent and Lois Lane (which was a pretty damn big moment in Superman history), but have they completely forgotten what an amazing character Lois Lane is? She's the one who gave Superman his name, for goodness sake!
A history of Superman shouldn't give more screen time to the Super Pets than it does to Lois Lane. She is not just a figure in an adoring crowd, she is a central part to the life of Clark Kent and Superman.
I saw it as a showcase of the respective eras rather than the characters, and to that end, I thought it jumped waaaay too quickly from N64 to Doomsday.A history of Superman shouldn't give more screen time to the Super Pets than it does to Lois Lane. She is not just a figure in an adoring crowd, she is a central part to the life of Clark Kent and Superman.
They're literally treating their superheroines as nothing but body parts.Wow. When you thought they couldn't do anything more offensive than "fridging", they come up with "rib-caging".
It's okay... no one really understands the Nu52.... don't feel bad...you are not alone.So, Superman got infected by Doomsday, and is now turning into Doomsday because Doomsday is like an insect, and all we've seen so far is his larval form?
WUT?
In the New 52 continuity, when did Superman face Doomsday? Did he die? I don't understand.
Yeah, but it's only because it reprints one of his stories. Bob Kane effectively blocked Finger from ever getting credit for his part in the creation of Batman (you know...everything about the character except the name).There's an interesting credit on the Special 75th anniversary edition of Detective Comics:
io9 (and others) have reported that this is the first time Bill Finger has received a cover credit for a Batman Story.
Yeah, I think it's a solid design too. The only thing that's odd is that Batgirl looks about 10 years younger than I was expecting.I actually like the redesign.
Only in the drawings they've showed yesterday. She's consistently in her low to mid-20s. On the Batman & Robin age range (from which you can guesstimate anyone in the DC universes age) she's younger than Bruce Wayne, older than Dick Grayson (although they've evened out over the years).For once I am happy that they lowered the sexiness quotient, since she is underage...
She's had a title SINCE the reboot, actually.Oh, I thought since DC was starting over, she would be like 14 again. Like in the DCAU Batman.
I haven't read comics in years. So they just put her back to an older age than she was when she was crippled, then rebooted?She's had a title SINCE the reboot, actually.
She was a cripple right to the end of the previous universe. I think she was de-aged a little bit (like to Nightwing's age) for the reboot. I don't think she was meant to be THIS young, but I'm not sure. I haven't read the book.I haven't read comics in years. So they just put her back to an older age than she was when she was crippled, then rebooted?
Look at the pistol on the left side. It has a blade on the butt of the handle.That illustration @filmfanatic posted above shows a complement of weapons, but with that character design, I keep expecting to see a gunblade.
I saw it, but given its placement I wasn't sure if it was part of a three-piece fishing rod-type arrangement that included the katana as the rod and the gunhook as the fishhook, or if it was just overlap from the items he is already holding.Look at the pistol on the left side. It has a blade on the butt of the handle.
I don't waste my time/energy/emotion on them so no. I'm really more annoyed with people complaining about them constantly. Particularly as they're lining up to buy them. So much good comics out there to enjoy, even from the big 2.Is anyone else getting tired of these big, universe-changing crossover events?
"Hey kids, remember back when people liked our comics more? Well, here's a small teaser of that. But then we're going right back to trying too hard to be like 90's Image Comics."As part of Convergence, DC's big event for next Spring featuring every DC universe colliding with other, all of the regular titles will go on hiatus and DC will publish 40 2-issue mini-series. These series include a number of callbacks to the pre-52 universe including Wally West as Flash, Stephanie Brown as Batgirl, Barbara Gordon as Oracle, Renee Montoya as the Question, and a certain married couple.
(via io9)
Outside of Swamp Thing and Animal Man, I ain't bought shit from DC since Blew fifty dudes.I don't waste my time/energy/emotion on them so no. I'm really more annoyed with people complaining about them constantly. Particularly as they're lining up to buy them. So much good comics out there to enjoy, even from the big 2.
Let me know when they start being like 2000's Image Comics. You know, the stuff I buy the hell out of because it's all pretty much great?"Hey kids, remember back when people liked our comics more? Well, here's a small teaser of that. But then we're going right back to trying too hard to be like 90's Image Comics."
I just don't care anymore. This feels more like a blatant slap in the face for people like me who hate the new DCU. At this point, I'm more a Marvel fan than I am DC.
Well that was a dumb thing to think. Hindsight, eh?DC is relaunching a bunch of titles at #1, resetting everything. Great idea, I think.
Don't ... worry about Superman right now. While it's cool to have the old Superman back and see him interacting with his son, while he and Lois and kid hide out on a farm under the guise of the Smith family, all signs point to a complete return to the old status quo. If they were going to keep a new thing going of Superman deciding farm life was for him with his wife and son, that'd be cool, but they're introducing elements to essentially pave the way to get both parents back to the Daily Planet, with the only difference now being that they have a 10-year-old (who will be in a series with Batman's son and possibly Batcow--now that's a comic I can get behind! )A lot of us got pulled into the excitement at first. Even me, whose first comment in this thread showcases my distaste for The Big Two. I wound up getting caught in the excitement, but it slowly dwindled.
I get the feeling Rebirth won't be much different. I'm curious to see what people's opinions will be on it in a few years and compare it with the New 52 universe. Everyone's still riding pretty high with it at the moment, but like New 52, I get the feeling that goodwill (and sales) will dwindle.
If anything, I think Rebirth has been even messier than the New 52. It's not a complete reboot and yet they still rebooted all the titles, acting like it's a fresh reboot. Yet it carries all the continuity from the last five or so years. People keep telling me to read the current Superman book and I'm just completely disinterested. DC hasn't earned my faith back and I doubt anything will at this point.
Snyder's Batman is the whole New 52 run; he never left the title during that phase. I think they just released volume 9 a week or two ago. It'd be nice if they collected them into fewer but larger volumes since he had a five-year run of the title, though. Same with Animal Man; I'm willing to buy the five Lemire volumes, but it'd be nice if they just put them in one or two omnibus covers.I'll admit SOME gems came out of New 52. Lemire's Animal Man and Snyder's Swamp Thing were two big wins to me. I own the trades for both of their runs. As I stated early in the thread years ago, I dug OMAC and I still have that trade on my shelf. I don't know how it turned out in the long run since I stopped buying it, but I wouldn't mind re-reading Demon Knights. And if DC ever does a new series of trades for Snyder's Batman, collecting them in in some easier to follow volumes (or just ones that would look nicer on the shelf, labeled something like "Scott Snyder's Batman, Volume 1, 2, 3, etc").
That's actually a really good point. Though there is a mini-series about them hiding on Earth post-Convergence, all those stories you listed were never told and probably won't be until someone does a Birthright-style graphic novel of that time period to "redefine" it. Which they should do because otherwise those stories will never be told.I don't know if I ever said it on here, but I think I know what bothers me the most about the classic Superman returning: it feels rushed. What bothers me isn't that he's back, but that DC didn't really earn it in my eyes. They literally skipped years of character development for Lois, Clark, and their son. We didn't see her learning she was pregnant. We didn't see them struggle with the idea of having a child or even if they should (or if she could carry through). We didn't see them visit Kent Farm to excitedly tell Martha (which they can't now because she's dead in this universe). I think the baby was born at the end of Convergence, but then they jumped to the kid being 5 or 6. There are years of storytelling skipped because they decided, "Welp, let's kill off this Supes and bring back the classic. Oh, and then we'll kill of this Lois, too, even though her new Superwoman title was supposed to star her." It all felt so rushed and inorganic. Not to mention that their entire story is muddled with crossovers like Convergence and Flashpoint, events like Rebirth, and other universes. I might have been interested if I could've caught up on the years that happened in between, with the issues of Action Comics that didn't come out because they decided to just return to the original numbering even though we've had 50-some issues focusing on the other guy.
Yeah, and for being a poor enough seller that DC wouldn't commit to just five more issues, NYT bestseller. I bought it and read it the release week. It's one of those books that should be brought up years from now. The guy who wrote it is on Batman now, so at least he can tell his stories without worrying DC is going to cancel the book this time.Oh, and as for Omega Men, I plan on reading that in its entirety at some point. I'll have to check if the whole thing is collected yet.
EDIT: Oh hey, look at that. Welp, that's wish listed.
Heh. It's like when Neil Gaiman got his copy of the first Absolute Sandman. He could stop a burglar with it. When the police ask what happened, he'd say, "I killed him with dreams." He said all that in a tweet or blog once.Snyder's Batman is the whole New 52 run; he never left the title during that phase. I think they just released volume 9 a week or two ago. It'd be nice if they collected them into fewer but larger volumes since he had a five-year run of the title, though. Same with Animal Man; I'm willing to buy the five Lemire volumes, but it'd be nice if they just put them in one or two omnibus covers.
Though not too big. I just got the 52 omnibus this past week, about 1200 pages in one hardcover. This is the best home defense I've ever had .
I hadn't actually started it yet, but I flipped to the ends of a couple issues (these are nice thick pages; Marvel should take notes) and there is sketches, concept art, a little word blurb here and there. I don't know if it's the same commentary as the books you have, but there are some small extras.Heh. It's like when Neil Gaiman got his copy of the first Absolute Sandman. He could stop a burglar with it. When the police ask what happened, he'd say, "I killed him with dreams." He said all that in a tweet or blog once.
But yeah, that's basically what I mean. I'd like his run in fewer, but larger volumes like Gail Simone's Secret Six or how DC is now finally re-collecting Greg Rucka's run on Wonder Woman. Given the popularity of Snyder's run, I'm sure it'll get re-collected some time in the future. I'm in no rush. I agree on Lemire's Animal Man. I actually only have the first three volumes (up to the Rotworld crossover with Swamp Thing), but borrowed out the last two at the library. I'd love to see a full, two-volume collection. They did one complete collection for Snyder's Swamp Thing, actually, though to be fair, his run stopped at the end of Rotworld.
Does that 52 omnibus include commentary in between each issue? I have the 4 softcover volumes that came out years ago which includes that. It has commentary from Rucka, Johns, Morrison, Waid, AND Giffen. Some really great insights. I thought about getting the newer 2-volume editions, but flipping through them, I saw the commentary wasn't included, which I thought was a huge loss.
Just read a review on Amazon for the omnibus and nope, it doesn't include the commentary. They were in between each issue and were 1-2 pages long each time. Damn shame. Still a great comic and I imagine the omnibus is gorgeous, but to not include the commentary is crazy. It was really insightful looks into the behind-the-scenes stuff. Like how a sudden, throwaway comment from Morrison during a meeting decided on the series' big villain.I hadn't actually started it yet, but I flipped to the ends of a couple issues (these are nice thick pages; Marvel should take notes) and there is sketches, concept art, a little word blurb here and there. I don't know if it's the same commentary as the books you have, but there are some small extras.
Nope, nothing like that. Lots of sketches/concept art and blurbs, but no big commentary aside from at the very beginning that summarizes Infinite Crisis. For the most part, it's just the story.Just read a review on Amazon for the omnibus and nope, it doesn't include the commentary. They were in between each issue and were 1-2 pages long each time. Damn shame. Still a great comic and I imagine the omnibus is gorgeous, but to not include the commentary is crazy. It was really insightful looks into the behind-the-scenes stuff. Like how a sudden, throwaway comment from Morrison during a meeting decided on the series' big villain.