Funny Pictures Thread. It begins again

GasBandit

GasBandit

Staff member
I was a die hard firefox guy, until they started screwing with it, making it suck and making it look more like chrome. After a while, I was like, well, if I'm going to have to have this be this way anyway, I might as well get the real thing instead of diet chrome.
 
PatrThom

PatrThom

GasBandit said:
I was a die hard firefox guy, until they started screwing with it, making it suck and making it look more like chrome. After a while, I was like, well, if I'm going to have to have this be this way anyway, I might as well get the real thing instead of diet chrome.
Click to expand...
Same thing happened to Opera a year ago. Everyone is moving to Chromium/Webkit behind the scenes, just because there's so much mobile web traffic from the built-in browser (mobile Safari in iOS and Chrome on Android) as well as apps using their own embedded browser (e.g., Facebook, Twitter) that everyone is scrambling to make their website mobile-friendly so they don't lose their precious traffic, and if they're going to build for Safari/Chrome anyway, they're going to do it for their main site, too. Firefox is the only major browser still bucking the trend (although there are some people trying to keep the "old" Opera alive).

--Patrick
 
fade

fade

Staff member
I haven't had any problem with Chrome that I know of. I know it uses a lot of RAM, but that usage has never affected me in any noticeable way. It has a low screen footprint, and it syncs beautifully cross-platform. And it doesn't look like ass, which matters for something you spend a lot of time in. The only nicer browser aesthetically is Safari, and its cross-platform implementation sucks.
 
fade

fade

Staff member
Why should we assume that wheat donuts are "normal" and need no qualifier? Stop pushing your donutriarchy in my face, and check your privilege.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top