When the majority of people see that your opinion is wrong, sometimes, though not always, means your opinion might be wrong.Ugh, that thread made me lose a lot of respect for this forum. Seriously, if you guys think Charlie looks like the dick in that thread you really have been drinking too much of the kool-aid.
Sometimes its mob mentality. Sometimes its being on the right side of the situation. Whichever you want to call it is fine. It's all a matter of perspective, but when one party specfically asks you to stop because it's emotionally painful during an emotionally weak time, the morally right thing to do is apologize and stop. Not continue to make it worse. If you can't see that as wrong, well then I think which side of the coin you're on.That sounds like a good a justification for mob mentality, which is all I saw there. But v0v, you have your choral approval, and apparently that's what some of you need.
You can think what you want, but I talk with Nick and know him. I also know what he's going through because I've seen my wife go through it, and the effect that people who acted the way Charlie did can have when a depressed person can grab onto one fragile and fleeting bit of positivity. They make easy targets and that's what Charlie was doing.If I thought that what you guys did was about standing up for TNG then maybe I would buy that. But that wasn't about doing something nice for Nick. That was about jumping at an oppurtunity to shit on Charlie.
Oh, wait. I did see that, I just didn't see the farewell thread.Aw, I missed the drama.
We give Charlie a lot of shit, mostly because he gives us a lot of shit. But I have to agree with Necronic on this one. I think the general response was disproportionate to the stimulus, as though it was supplemented by leftover hostility from other threads.if you guys think Charlie looks like the dick in that thread you really have been drinking too much of the kool-aid.
Of that, I have no doubt. But I don't see why each thread should be treated as wholly separate from the others. Charlie is an ass oftentimes, and that history/reputation leads to people having a low threshold for his bullshit. That is entirely a mess of his own making. I'm not going to shed a tear if the guy who is usually annoying, rude, and condescending decided to leave when people didn't respond nicely to him.PatrThom said:I think the general response was disproportionate to the stimulus, as though it was supplemented by leftover hostility from other threads.
--Patrick
Or black. Because racism.
Agreed. I guess I expected people would've bled off their frustration elsewhere rather than saving it up and then exploding all at once. Pressures are getting high what with holidays and recent events, so I suppose that explains a lot.I don't see why each thread should be treated as wholly separate from the others.
I remember when they did this with the Muppets. Not enough eyerolls in the world.I didn't want to ruin the Lego Movie thread with this, and this was the 2nd best choice.
LEGO MOVIE USED AS CORPORATE SHILL TO PUSH...
…Anti-business agendum? What did I just watch?
--Patrick
I remember when they did this with the Muppets. Not enough eyerolls in the world.
ugh... Fox...
Beyonce is just stupid through and through. All her songs are contradictory and actually push back female empowerment.
Woah, did you not hear her song where she shows that she's a strong, independent, woman who don't need no man?Beyonce is just stupid through and through. All her songs are contradictory and actually push back female empowerment.
Oh god... is that what it feels like to be Charlie... I'm going to go and bleach my brain.
Honestly though, I can't stand her as an entertainer or as a person.
I think a good point was made in an article that said it shouldn't be about not using words (another one will crop up anyway), but about removing the stigma from 'bossy'. Nonetheless, "bossy" children are problematic in their own ways, at home especially; for instance my niece has taken to trying to run all conversations and lecture any other kids. Katie (my sister; her mom) does tell her not to be "bossy" but I've usually gone with "so-and-so already has a parent."I'm Canadian so the 'ban bossy' thing isn't up here, but isn't it just an alliterative title (albit poorly choosen perhaps) for a program that aims at having adults not bully little girls who stand up for themselves? Like how young girls are signifigantly less likely to take on leadership roles and are consistently silenced, while boys are encourage to stand up and take the lead? So when a girl says 'we're doing x' she's called 'bossy' and basically shut down, whereas when a boy does the same thing it's accepted and priased? I can hunt down sorces if you insist, but really, the whole whining about a movement aimed at stopping people silencing (some say bullying, I'm not convinced, yes I know I used the term ealrier) little girls seems extraordinarily petty. Ther term may be sexless, but the application is far from that.