Those are retractable anti-traffic pylons. They are raised when a street is closed to motor traffic due to pedestrian crowds, to, say, stop vehicles from plowing into said crowds.I don't really get the "Five Pillars of Islam" one. If it's a reference that they look like women in a burka, it's a really weak one. if it's anything else, I'm clueless.
My guess: Those are the barriers that stop people from driving into crowds of pedestrians, a recent strategy by terrorists.I don't really get the "Five Pillars of Islam" one. If it's a reference that they look like women in a burka, it's a really weak one. if it's anything else, I'm clueless.
Those pillars can be lowered into the street and raised to stop vehicles from passingI don't really get the "Five Pillars of Islam" one. If it's a reference that they look like women in a burka, it's a really weak one. if it's anything else, I'm clueless.
Eh, even these do ok.They're not designed to stop anything, really, and a truck will drive straight through them. The anti-truck pylons look different.
I'm sure you're well aware of the difference between a people car and a truck. Yes, I've seen a regular car balanced on one of these, and I'm very sure it was a total loss. A 40ton truck hardly even slows down with these. Also, the ones shown in the picture aren't the ones shown in that video - they're the bigger, aluminum kind for blocking shopping street and city center traffic during pedestrian hours.Eh, even these do ok.
If they overbooked the flight how is the person who's boarding pass was scanned and made their way to their seat the one who needs to leave? It's assigned seating.As I said, the initial situation is from a practice that while legal, is abhorrent, but when you're bumped, how is it OK to not get off the plane, and to flail and fight those who are trying to remove you?
I said above quite clearly that I find the practice abhorrent, and thus am not defending the legality of it (I in fact am in favor of making it illegal for all venues, be they seats in transportation, events, or hotel rooms, rental cars, etc), but I'm asking: What was the airline supposed to do once they decide a person gets bumped, and they refuse to move? They called security (which seems correct) and then they had a problem with the guy.Legal does not mean smart. Yeah, it's legal of them to bump him off the plane, but sometimes the legal thing is not the smart or right thing to do.
The "friendly" skies have been going downhill for quite some time now, what with the TSA, dwindling personal space, etc. United was just the first to publicly cross some sort of line.We started this conversation in the Random Crap Thread yesterday, but the whole fucking situation is a clusterfuck and I hopeUnitedAirlines in general lose a ton of business.
You get my props for word of the day with "debacle." I don't think any word I've seen so far describes it as well. It even edges out "clusterfuck" IMO.Like that other guy said, they should have just kept going up on the vouchers. Two or even three thousand dollars in travel vouchers would have been better than this massive PR debacle.