K
Kitty Sinatra
Dude. Did you just suggest drowning illegal immigrants? Not cool, man.
Not cool.
Not cool.
Fish don't drown silly.Gruebeard said:Dude. Did you just suggest drowning illegal immigrants? Not cool, man.
Not cool.
You bet it's not. "Such stories are common" my French-speaking ass.Frankie said:Well, not that our system is perfect, but this guy is over-exaggerating by a huge degree. I've had two surgeries done on me in my lifetime, one to repair a knee injury (which I received playing high school football) and one to remove bone splinters out of my foot. Both times I had virtually zero wait between being told I'd need surgery and getting surgery. It is not as bad as they make out to be.GasBandit said:What a Canadian doctor has to say about the Canadian healthcare system.
Are you....are you REALLY suggesting to listen to OLIVER NORTH on potential abuse of power? Really? Please tell me you are joking. In case anyone doesn't know, Oliver North was a key player in the Iran-Contra scandal, where (in direct violation of Congress and the law) he and others sold arms to Iran and then turned around and gave that money to the Contras, a rather despicable group. He was eventually convicted of 16 felony counts, although he did not serve any jail time because he recieved immunity in exchange for testifying in front of Congress. This guy is who you're going to hang your hat on? Seriously?GasBandit said:Dragged this one up specially for Dieb - Oliver North says he's been waterboarded, and has waterboarded others, and he does not consider it torture.
Oh ho ho, calling this a "fraud" when you hate it so much when people say Bush lied? Well, the phrase in question is certainly spin. There is no way to measure jobs saved. But this doesn't mean that it's a "fraud" - there are many economic models one can use to estimate jobs saved. He's not just pulling numbers out of thin air. I'm not saying I love the fact that Obama's using spin, but he IS a politician.Obama has a line he's using to great effectiveness. "Saved or created." The phrase refers to jobs. It's a fraud.
The agents went into the immigrants' homes without warrents, probable cause, or their consent. Ummm, yea, their constitutional rights have been violated. My god, do you not believe in the fourth amendment any more? Also, what the fuck does this have to do with ID cards? This case would be thrown out regardless of the ID cards.In New Haven, CT government officials thought it would be a good idea to issue ID cards to everyone, including illegal immigrants. Two days after the law goes into place, federal agents conduct a raid and catch four illegal immigrants. Now the court says that the constitutional rights of these illegal immigrants have been violated.
What a badly written article. You have to read to the end that an SUV is only more green than a commuter train IF the SUV is completly full (with an SUV, that means seven people) and the train is only a quarter full. Raise your hand if you're car pooling to work with six other people.Getting rid of your SUV because it is the "green" thing to do? Not so fast ....
Sure, PayGo is something of a gimmick. Congress can just vote to override it when it wants to. But there is a cost to such a vote - it makes it harder for the government it add to the deficit. PayGo was in effect from 1990-2002. That time period was also the best in deficit reduction since at least the 1960s. Now, obviously, PayGo is not completely, or even mostly, responsible for this. But it helped.Yesterday Obama urged congress to reinstitute PayGo. It sounds good, but unfortunately PayGo is just a meaningless gimmick.
That Oliver North changes nothing about the debate on it, really. I just included it to raise your blood pressure.Dieb said:Are you....are you REALLY suggesting to listen to OLIVER NORTH on potential abuse of power? Really? Please tell me you are joking. In case anyone doesn't know, Oliver North was a key player in the Iran-Contra scandal, where (in direct violation of Congress and the law) he and others sold arms to Iran and then turned around and gave that money to the Contras, a rather despicable group. He was eventually convicted of 16 felony counts, although he did not serve any jail time because he recieved immunity in exchange for testifying in front of Congress. This guy is who you're going to hang your hat on? Seriously?GasBandit said:Dragged this one up specially for Dieb - Oliver North says he's been waterboarded, and has waterboarded others, and he does not consider it torture.
Oh ho ho, calling this a "fraud" when you hate it so much when people say Bush lied? Well, the phrase in question is certainly spin. There is no way to measure jobs saved. But this doesn't mean that it's a "fraud" - there are many economic models one can use to estimate jobs saved. He's not just pulling numbers out of thin air. I'm not saying I love the fact that Obama's using spin, but he IS a politician.[/quote:3vw5r59d]I'm not exactly chanting "Obama lied, my mortgage died, no blood for windfarms" here. I'm just calling an untruth an untruth.[quote:3vw5r59d]Obama has a line he's using to great effectiveness. "Saved or created." The phrase refers to jobs. It's a fraud.
The agents went into the immigrants' homes without warrents, probable cause, or their consent. Ummm, yea, their constitutional rights have been violated. My god, do you not believe in the fourth amendment any more? Also, what the fuck does this have to do with ID cards? This case would be thrown out regardless of the ID cards.[/quote:3vw5r59d][quote:3vw5r59d]In New Haven, CT government officials thought it would be a good idea to issue ID cards to everyone, including illegal immigrants. Two days after the law goes into place, federal agents conduct a raid and catch four illegal immigrants. Now the court says that the constitutional rights of these illegal immigrants have been violated.
I'd say if their government-issued ID data shows them to be illegally in the country, that constitutes probable cause, wouldn't you?The Oxford Companion to American Law said:Probable cause is defined as "information sufficient to warrant a prudent person's belief that the wanted individual had committed a crime or that evidence of a crime or contraband would be found in a search".
Ha, well, don't worry about me, my blood pressure is the extremely low end of healty, actually. But it IS in the healthy range; no need to try to raise it, although I appreaciate the gestureGasBandit said:That Oliver North changes nothing about the debate on it, really. I just included it to raise your blood pressure.
Saying something is an untruth is a lot different than calling it a fraud. And I don't even think this rises to the level of untruth.I'm not exactly chanting "Obama lied, my mortgage died, no blood for windfarms" here. I'm just calling an untruth an untruth.
Once again, the judge disagrees with you. Probably because "the agents went into both homes looking for specific illegal immigrants on a "target list," who weren't found, court documents say". The agents were there for other people, didn't find them, so just arrested whomever they found there. The had no probable cause to believe that these people were illegal immigrants before they barged into their houses. It looks like a obvious violation of the fourth amendment and, hey, someone impartial who knows far more about the facts of the case and the law at hand than you or I agrees.I'd say if their government-issued ID data shows them to be illegally in the country, that constitutes probable cause, wouldn't you?The Oxford Companion to American Law said:Probable cause is defined as "information sufficient to warrant a prudent person's belief that the wanted individual had committed a crime or that evidence of a crime or contraband would be found in a search".
GasBandit said:The agents went into the immigrants' homes without warrents, probable cause, or their consent. Ummm, yea, their constitutional rights have been violated. My god, do you not believe in the fourth amendment any more? Also, what the fuck does this have to do with ID cards? This case would be thrown out regardless of the ID cards.[quote:219g0qmo]In New Haven, CT government officials thought it would be a good idea to issue ID cards to everyone, including illegal immigrants. Two days after the law goes into place, federal agents conduct a raid and catch four illegal immigrants. Now the court says that the constitutional rights of these illegal immigrants have been violated.
I'd say if their government-issued ID data shows them to be illegally in the country, that constitutes probable cause, wouldn't you?[/quote:219g0qmo]The Oxford Companion to American Law said:Probable cause is defined as "information sufficient to warrant a prudent person's belief that the wanted individual had committed a crime or that evidence of a crime or contraband would be found in a search".
How would that even work if they're natural born citizens?AshburnerX said:I'm even for revoking the US citizenship of anyone who knowingly helps them get in...
Other countries exile people all the time. It's not exactly hard... you just send them to a country that will take them or dump them on a boat in international waters, and revoke their citizenship. They come back, you do it again or you execute them.Frankie said:How would that even work if they're natural born citizens?AshburnerX said:I'm even for revoking the US citizenship of anyone who knowingly helps them get in...
It may in fact be that, which is probably why these people get to keep in business.A Troll said:I don't have the exact decision here with me, but I'm fairly certain that the courts decided that forced deportation of a natural born citizen is cruel and unusual.
While my surgery wasn't entirely necessary as yours was, I've had a few operations done on my right ear to re-build it's appearance and improve my hearing. I met the doctor, then in less than two weeks I was already on the operating table. After a requisite period to recover - about 2-3 months - I was already scheduling another operation.Frankie said:Well, not that our system is perfect, but this guy is over-exaggerating by a huge degree. I've had two surgeries done on me in my lifetime, one to repair a knee injury (which I received playing high school football) and one to remove bone splinters out of my foot. Both times I had virtually zero wait between being told I'd need surgery and getting surgery. It is not as bad as they make out to be.GasBandit said:What a Canadian doctor has to say about the Canadian healthcare system.
No system in existence couldn't be made better, obviously.BlackCrossCrusader said:I'm quite content with our healthcare system, though I won't deny it could use some more improvements.
You'll be waiting a long time. Shego keeps getting stopped at the border.Lamont said:But I'm still waiting to see the people dying in the streets here.
Holy crap. I'm reminded once again just how Two-Party system the US is. Even at the state level, across all the states, it's the same 2 parties controlling y'all? Really? Please tell me that NY's GOP only shares its name with Bush's GOP, not funding, organization and all the other shit that makes up a political party.Futureking said:The New York Senate has been taken over by the GOP. Through party hopping, no less.
No, the Republicans and Democrats are both national organizations that share the same leadership, funding, and what have you at all levels.Gruebeard said:Holy crap. I'm reminded once again just how Two-Party system the US is. Even at the state level, across all the states, it's the same 2 parties controlling y'all? Really? Please tell me that NY's GOP only shares its name with Bush's GOP, not funding, organization and all the other shit that makes up a political party.Futureking said:The New York Senate has been taken over by the GOP. Through party hopping, no less.
Wow. That was a terrible, terrible blog post. Simply awful.GasBandit said:Study: Politicians share traits with serial killers.
heh, the tags in the title were a nice touch.MindDetective said:Wow. That was a terrible, terrible blog post. Simply awful.GasBandit said:Study: Politicians share traits with serial killers.
His plan did not get booed. He mentioned his opposition to putting limits on malpractice damages after the conference, and THAT got him booed.GasBandit said:Obama pitched his healthcare reform to the American Medical Association yesterday. He got booed.
Hmmm. On the surface this is a good article, but while the guy has a lot to say bad about the Democratic plans he also makes some base assumptions about the benevolence of the insurance companies. He calls for a dissolution of Medicare & Medicaid and then says that this slack will be taken up by individual patients. the problem with this is that the gap between one ending and the other becoming affordable will ensure that millions of people will be at risk. This plan would RUIN more people than it would save.GasBandit said:How to fix health care, save 5 trillion dollars, and yet retain personal liberty.
I said nothing that was not true.A Troll said:His plan did not get booed. He mentioned his opposition to putting limits on malpractice damages after the conference, and THAT got him booed.GasBandit said:Obama pitched his healthcare reform to the American Medical Association yesterday. He got booed.
Do you ever get tired of trying to distort the truth in your posts?
Intentionally misleading though? Yes.GasBandit said:I said nothing that was not true.A Troll said:His plan did not get booed. He mentioned his opposition to putting limits on malpractice damages after the conference, and THAT got him booed.GasBandit said:Obama pitched his healthcare reform to the American Medical Association yesterday. He got booed.
Do you ever get tired of trying to distort the truth in your posts?
Bad comparison? You betcha.Krisken said:Intentionally misleading though? Yes.GasBandit said:I said nothing that was not true.A Troll said:His plan did not get booed. He mentioned his opposition to putting limits on malpractice damages after the conference, and THAT got him booed.GasBandit said:Obama pitched his healthcare reform to the American Medical Association yesterday. He got booed.
Do you ever get tired of trying to distort the truth in your posts?
He gave the speech in his underwear. True? Yes. Intentionally misleading? Damn straight.
Not a bad comparison at all. He's proving why your post was as misleading as a normal Fox News headline. (Or MSNBC headline slanted the other direction.) You never bothered to state that it was the only thing they booed and that the rest of the time he got standing ovations.GasBandit said:Bad comparison? You betcha.Krisken said:Intentionally misleading though? Yes.GasBandit said:I said nothing that was not true.A Troll said:His plan did not get booed. He mentioned his opposition to putting limits on malpractice damages after the conference, and THAT got him booed.
Do you ever get tired of trying to distort the truth in your posts?
He gave the speech in his underwear. True? Yes. Intentionally misleading? Damn straight.
Well, when I am NOT, people don't respondEdrondol said:On purpose because you are evil and just trying to stir up shit.
Stupid stupid writing:GasBandit said:According to Rasmussen, 80% of Americans want the Obama administration to sell its stake in GM and Chrysler ASAP.
It's trying to say that Republican tend to opposes this more, but if we do the math (100%-Democrats in favor) we get 55% opposed, which is 9% higher than the Republicans. This isn't likely true because there were probably a significant number of "undecideds" but there's no way to know this from the idiot's writing. Compare the same fucking values! Ugh.On the issue of giving the stock directly to the American people, however, there is a partisan gap. Nearly half of Democrats(45%) and unaffiliated voters (48%) favor such a move, but the plurality of Republicans (46%) is opposed.
There was a plan?!?Gruebeard said:Anyway, yeah. Most Americans should be in favor of dumping the stocks ASAP. That's the plan, anyway. When that time comes is really far more important, though. Like with Iraq, they can't pull out too quickly without ruining the plan.
Of course there was, don't you remember? It was the wholesale exchange of blood for oil on a 1:1 ratio.AshburnerX said:There was a plan?!?Gruebeard said:Anyway, yeah. Most Americans should be in favor of dumping the stocks ASAP. That's the plan, anyway. When that time comes is really far more important, though. Like with Iraq, they can't pull out too quickly without ruining the plan.