You know, I was wondering how you could go from governor to speaker of the house. I guess I combined all of Wisconsin's shitty, nationally-relevant politicians into one.
You know, I was wondering how you could go from governor to speaker of the house. I guess I combined all of Wisconsin's shitty, nationally-relevant politicians into one.
Actually, the speaker doesn't have to be a sitting representative. Anyone can be speaker of the house, if they get the votes.You know, I was wondering how you could go from governor to speaker of the house. I guess I combined all of Wisconsin's shitty, nationally-relevant politicians into one.
True, but it has never happened yet.Actually, the speaker doesn't have to be a sitting representative. Anyone can be speaker of the house, if they get the votes.
For two projects (I read the article, it's two, not just 1 development), what's the overhead on getting the machines in there to harvest, and paying the wages for... how many weeks there for how many people? If it took 4 weeks for, half a dozen people with modern logging machinery? Something tells me that "profit" number there is eaten up by wages and fuel for the machines, but I could be way off.Current retail price for a "green" cord of wood in Boston, MA: $275
Number of cords of wood harvested, according to that article: 788
Total wholesale value of wood harvested, in Bostonian dollars and assuming 100% retail markup: ~$108,000
Total cost paid: $15,000
Total profit being generated and paid to ???: ~$93,000
Answers are in order.
--Patrick
Ah, then yeah, sure.The problem isn't the selling of the wood, it's the clearing of the wood from a state park - owned and operated by the state of Wisconsin.
I fully agree that it needs to be CLOSELY examined, but I've also seen such mundane things as "let's hire a logging company to clear the stuff from near the highways, and the payment is that they get to keep the timber." That's happened in Canada in many National and Provincial parks. It's normal, and works for everybody, because it's cleared X distance from the road for safety. The TransCanada Highway in Banff National Park is a good example of this, as is in Tera Nova park in Newfoundland (no I'm not kidding on that name, think about it, and groan at the pun).The problem isn't the selling of the wood, it's the clearing of the wood from a state park - owned and operated by the state of Wisconsin.
And I give you: Politics in the Animal Kingdom
Fair enough, but it would also have support of any representatives from an area where there is a measurable amount of independent and/or 3rd party support that they think they can grab on the 2nd-choice part of a ballot, thus making it good for them.Any kind of instant-runoff voting would be an improvement, be it ranked or STV. Unfortunately, it would undermine the power of the two big parties, so I don't expect the bill to get anywhere.
Unfortunately, how things work in Washington is party leadership can either reward you with committee appointments if you toe the line, or organize to make you (the congressman/senator) isolated and irrelevant if you don't. So even the most grassroots of candidates gets to the Capitol, they get eaten up by the machine and have to play ball - or get blackballed. There's even a designated party position explicitly named "party whip" whose main responsibility it is to go around to the troublesome independently-minded party members and wrestle them into voting the way party leadership wants - or else.Fair enough, but it would also have support of any representatives from an area where there is a measurable amount of independent and/or 3rd party support that they think they can grab on the 2nd-choice part of a ballot, thus making it good for them.
Enough? Probably not, but it's a thing.
"Party Whip" is a thing just about everywhere. They have varying amounts of power.Unfortunately, how things work in Washington is party leadership can either reward you with committee appointments if you toe the line, or organize to make you (the congressman/senator) isolated and irrelevant if you don't. So even the most grassroots of candidates gets to the Capitol, they get eaten up by the machine and have to play ball - or get blackballed. There's even a designated party position explicitly named "party whip" whose main responsibility it is to go around to the troublesome independently-minded party members and wrestle them into voting the way party leadership wants - or else.
Now we just need a "Party Nae Nae"
There are alternative methods now.
Minus points for the drone surviving. [emoji3]There are alternative methods now.
--Patrick
It's hard to trace its origin if you destroy it.Minus points for the drone surviving.
It'll just be another arms race. The drones already have magnetometers, accelerometers, and gyroscopes, so they can do pretty good dead reckoning. If communications is cut, today's drones shut down and drop to the ground as shown in the video, but tomorrow's drones will return to a designated area instead, even without GPS or communications.There are alternative methods now.
--Patrick
That person needs to be punched in the dick.Common Core strikes again?
"No, 5 times 3 is not 5 plus 5 plus 5, it is 3 plus 3 plus 3 plus 3 plus 3, so you get it wrong."
You can hire Volus mercenaries for that.That person needs to be punched in the dick.
Boy, 3 x 50 is going to be a real bitch.Actually, I think I understand what they are trying to do there... while 5x5x5 is technically correct, it's not simplest form. You always use the lowest possible factors and build to higher ones when using factorization, so they want to encourage this sort of thought process NOW with repeated addition so that high school algebra and geometry will be easier when you need to start using factorization to break down large numbers via multiplying smaller numbers together to find LCD for fractions. It's just one of those things that only make sense when you look at later processes you have to do in school.
Boy, 3 x 50 is going to be a real bitch.
Which is why Common Core looks so inconsistent at the lower levels: they know kids will use the faster method if they understand it for small numbers (which is fine), but it's equally important they understand that 3 X 50 is also 2 x 3 x 5 x 5 and how to apply that to when they start doing LCD of fractions later. It actually makes sense in that regard: everything Common Core does is about getting kids to pass their college entry exams, so it's designed to share processes and build on them. But because it does this, the lowest level stuff looks absolutely insane to people like us who were just forced to memorize multiplication tables like cave men. I wasn't even taught how to factor until I started taking college classes! It would have made middle and high school math so much easier.Boy, 3 x 50 is going to be a real bitch.
You americans are just screwed up. I remember fractions and factorization from grade 3.Which is why Common Core looks so inconsistent at the lower levels: they know kids will use the faster method if they understand it for small numbers (which is fine), but it's equally important they understand that 3 X 50 is also 2 x 3 x 5 x 5 and how to apply that to when they start doing LCD of fractions later. It actually makes sense in that regard: everything Common Core does is about getting kids to pass their college entry exams, so it's designed to share processes and build on them. But because it does this, the lowest level stuff looks absolutely insane to people like us who were just forced to memorize multiplication tables like cave men. I wasn't even taught how to factor until I started taking college classes! It would have made middle and high school math so much easier.