To make money forSo, the push to fully reopen schools is a blatant attempt to end the public school system in America, right? There's not some other reason to push this hard for such a bad idea, is there?
I honestly believe it's really a misguided attempt to show everybody, "See? Normal! Everything is back to normal now, and the seriousness of the epidemic was overblown just like we told you it was."There's not some other reason to push this hard for such a bad idea, is there?
DING DING DING DING DING DING DING!!!So, the push to fully reopen schools is a blatant attempt to end the public school system in America, right? There's not some other reason to push this hard for such a bad idea, is there?
That's so shitty. A third of my current dev team are parents to young children (newborns to teenagers and everything in-between), and you best believe that their children are part of our routines. They work harder because it's OK that they have to drive the 7 year old to the dentist and then drop them off at dance practice. My team lead, who is several times more productive than me, regularly gets interrupted mid-sentence by one of his daughters begging for a tablet, or minecraft time. We crack jokes and carry on, not demand ~childcare arrangements~.I've already seen a couple of companies requiring "proof of child care" to parents that want to work from home. As in, ether that someone else is there taking care of them, that they are attending school, or that they are otherwise out of the house such as in a daycare. Because they want a total monopoly on your time and attention. I mean... it's bad enough that companies are essentially leasing your home's workspace for free, but now they seem to feel they get to dictate your living situation as well. It's pretty fucked up.
Well, it's nice to know that if they don't like an existing law, they have a mechanism for changing said law, and they apparently know how to exercise that right. I just wish they were not using this as an opportunity to be aggressively regressive.Russia just passed a constitutional amendment denying legal status to same-sex marriages.
Often it is said of foreign entities, such as China, that "don't blame Chinese people for the actions of the Chinese government..." but in this case, this is clearly an instance where the Russian people actively support homophobic policy, and have updated the constitution to reflect their beliefs.Well, it's nice to know that if they don't like an existing law, they have a mechanism for changing said law, and they apparently know how to exercise that right. I just wish they were not using this as an opportunity to be aggressively regressive.
--Patrick
Heh, over here not enough people showed up for the referendum to count when it came to reword the stuff about marriage in the constitution so it's no longer the rather gender neutral "between spouses".Russia just passed a constitutional amendment denying legal status to same-sex marriages.
Russian constitution change ends hopes for same-sex marriage
ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (AP) — At the Lagutenko wedding in 2017, the couple exchanged vows, rings and kisses in front of friends and relatives, then took a traditional drive in a limousine, stopping at landmarks for photos.apnews.com
The Alabama Democrats have something to say about that...If 10 years ago you would've told me that Tommy Tuberville was gonna be a senator I would've said "Tommy Tuberville? The football coach? He's a senator? Who's the president, Donald Trump?"