I'm pretty sure it's still mavembuary the 56th of 2020.Is it just me or has 2021 just flown by?
Anakin and Padme meme:
Many of the fears expressed when the US announced the withdrawal earlier this year do seem to have come to pass, with the Taliban winning at this point. And major powers with world-spanning interests should be careful about making drastic policy changes, since the furtherance of those interests is often impacted by co-operation from local and regional powers, who need to see the US as a dependable ally.Top notch job done there, and leaving at this point in time was a wonderful choice - as in, it makes anyone wonder why the F anyone could think it was the right one. Anything that had been built up is gone, any good will has evaporated because allies were deserted in hostile territory, and 20 years was not long enough now and won't be long enough next time. Congratulations on replacing Vietnam as your country's biggest fuckup. You should never have gone there, and if you did, you should not have left.
Many of the fears expressed when the US announced the withdrawal earlier this year do seem to have come to pass, with the Taliban winning at this point. And major powers with world-spanning interests should be careful about making drastic policy changes, since the furtherance of those interests is often impacted by co-operation from local and regional powers, who need to see the US as a dependable ally.
Still, this has been a very long operation. The US went to Afghanistan in 2001. A decade later, Osama bin Laden was killed in 2011, and Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan was pretty much finished. Yet the US has stayed there for another decade, as it was feared that the Afghan security forces might not be able to keep order in the country on their own (Afghanistan president Hamid Karzai said in 2011 that it would take 10 billion USD per year for 10 years), and preliminary peace talks with the Taliban were also began in 2011. Now, the operation has lasted 20 years, at a cost of around 1 trillion USD. If we haven't reached an acceptable end state by this point (whatever that end state might be), what could we realistically still gain, and how long would it still take?
Strategy is the art of balancing ends and means, and the great questions of the coming decades are unlikely to be decided on the plains and mountains of Afghanistan. With limited interests in Afghanistan, the costs of remaining, and the uncertainty of the benefits that could be gained by remaining, at what point does it become reasonable to call it quits and let the chips fall where they may?
You should never have gone there, and if you did, you should not have left.
Assuming I understood your position correctly (and please feel free to correct me if I didn't), I agree. The challenges were known from the beginning, as was known by all that the allies won't be in Afghanistan forever, 20 years and one trillion dollars weren't enough to find a solution that would work, limited interests to stay in the country at least post-2011, uncertainty over what staying would serve to accomplish any more beyond maintaining a messy stalemate as long as you're still there, and the costs of maintaining a presence (in both blood and treasure).There is a reason that Afghanistan is known as the place where Empires die. To put it bluntly... this has happened any and every time anyone from outside the region has gotten involved, the locals knew this and were mostly playing along until business as usual inevitably returned. I mean... how do you defeat a foe that only needs to bury it's weapons for a generation and wait for you to leave? Short of just wiping every living soul in the region off the map, I mean. What is the actual net global security gain if we do?
And we knew that going in because that's what has been going on in the American South since the end of Reconstruction.
15 years ago, I was reading an article about the US Army Corp of Engineers working with local Afghans to keep a power station running. The local engineers (who would be left to keep the place running) kept using jerry rigged solutions to fix problems whenever they came up, to the annoyance of the US engineers. Worse, the new parts that were being sent to the station to fix these problems would keep disappearing right after delivery. Eventually command got sick of the situation and demanded answers, so one of the US engineers sat down with the local engineers and asked them what the deal was. Their response was simply: they buried everything in the desert so the Taliban wouldn't steal it when they came through, so they would have the parts when they absolutely needed to use one instead of their jerry rigs. They knew from Day One that the US would leave eventually and that this was their only solution to ensure they would have power 30-40 years down the line and to give them plausible deniability when the Taliban came back into town ("The Americans took the parts when they left!") because they'd just steal it all and sell it on the black market.Assuming I understood your position correctly (and please feel free to correct me if I didn't), I agree. The challenges were known from the beginning, as was known by all that the allies won't be in Afghanistan forever, 20 years and one trillion dollars weren't enough to find a solution that would work, limited interests to stay in the country at least post-2011, uncertainty over what staying would serve to accomplish any more beyond maintaining a messy stalemate as long as you're still there, and the costs of maintaining a presence (in both blood and treasure).
I think it was high time to go home. The aftermath won't be pretty which is unfortunate, but there just isn't enough reason to stay anymore.
Damn. Wouldn't that have been something?And, whoops, there goes Kabul!
Ah well, the regime you guys tried to prop up lasted, what, a week? Shame they couldn't wait for a bit and make it fall on 9/11/21 to be nice and symbolic.
Yup. The...15.000? I think? US-trained commandos put up some fight and a few thousand of them died. The rest of that "300.000 man strong army" mostly just folded right up. They may have had an air force, but not a single plane ever took off. They had tanks but didn't use them. In some cases it was personal cowardice, but mostly it was just acceptance of the facts in front of them...Plus a whole lot of them actually agreeing with the Taliban, of course. Just like the army in most Western countries skews strongly to the right, politically, so it does in the East. But their "right" is of course Islamic extremism rather than Christian/nationalistic extremism. A total lack of leadership and command, no confidence, lack of knowledge and experience in handling the fancy equipment they had, being aware that your biggest ally just dropped you like a stone and can't be expected or trusted to have your back...Who exactly thought these guys would be up to facing the Taliban? You didn't need much of a psychologist degree to see this was doomed. The whole country needed to be transformed, over a period of generations. That didn't happen, so half the population got stuck in their backwards "just waiting for those others to leave" mentality. You know, like happened after the Civil War in the USA :-PPeople keep asking me how the Taliban is taking over so quickly considering how much gear and training we gave the Afghan army, and I have to remind them that it's because nearly no one is actually resisting them. Other then small pockets, most of the local governments and military have been handing over their weapons and surrendering because they feel the conquest is inevitable without the US there to intervene, and so they are trying to get on the Taliban's good side so they are hopefully shown mercy. As much as Biden deserves a lot of blame on this, I don't think anyone really saw nearly the entire Afghan government and military basically give up city by city before a bullet could even be fired.
He wanted us to keep pumping trillions into Afghanistan for generations? Fuck that nonsense.
Many military people have an “If we failed, it must be because we didn’t Military hard enough” mindset, which is an attitude I find uncomfortably stratocratic.He wanted us to keep pumping trillions into Afghanistan for generations? Fuck that nonsense.
Western Germany had a legitimate government, Western Germany had a working army Afghanistan had neither despite 20 years and trillions spent.The last US soldiers who were in Western Germany to protect against the communist invasion, who'd arrived in 1944, didn't leave until 1995 (yes, long after the Wall fell) (and technically, there's still a presence there in the form of the US bases, now as bases in allied territory).
It wouldn't have worked because there was no legitimate government or army. To think that warning the taliban would have helped is ignorant as hell. There was never going to be anything resembling a good outcome in Afghanistan and the only thing stupider than the US leaving was the US staying even one more day.Leaving the Afghan army to greens for themselves was foolish and short sighted and set up to fail. Reduce presence and leave it to the Ana but with some bases and the clear message to the Taliban "if you start trouble we'll be back" might have worked. "go right ahead, we're fucking off, we don't care anymore" was... A bad message.
They do deserve much better. But so did every American that went hungry cause we fucking burned trillions in that fucking money pit and every American that died trying to achieve an impossible objective.America taught Afghanis to fight like Americans, then took away the air support and propped up an impossibly corrupt government, which stole billions.
The whole thing stinks and all you managed was untold deaths and a generation of girls who grew up outside of the oppressive Taliban only to be tossed back to them.
They deserved better than outright abandonment to sex slavery.